- Lead
- 7,629
- Total
- 13,324
- vs nation
- R+55.8
- Turnout
- 66.4%
Iroquois County, IL
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 66.4% of 20,234 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 7,969
- Total
- 14,043
- vs nation
- R+61.2
- Turnout
- 66.9%
- Lead
- 7,246
- Total
- 13,102
- vs nation
- R+57.4
- Turnout
- 59.9%
- Lead
- 5,707
- Total
- 12,811
- vs nation
- R+48.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,052
- Total
- 13,596
- vs nation
- R+37.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 6,082
- Total
- 13,835
- vs nation
- R+41.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,288
- Total
- 13,424
- vs nation
- R+32.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,005
- Total
- 12,737
- vs nation
- R+24.3
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+57.3MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 26,4492024 5-year
- Median household income
- $66,2552024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 87.2%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.8%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 8.3%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+19.7 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+57.3 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Ford County, IL · twin score 84.6
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 66.4%13,428 participants ÷ 20,234 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +15.4 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -6.7 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 50.9%–52.9%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 13,102 | 21,868 | 59.9% | C/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 10,434 | 21,511 | 48.5% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 14,051 | 20,990 | 66.9% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 10,658 | 20,686 | 51.5% | C/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 13,428 | 20,234 | 66.4% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 148/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
74 precincts · 5,610 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -LodaLoda | 203 | 582 | 19 | 804 | 25.2% | 72.4% | R+47.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Pigeon GrovePigeon Grove | 83 | 534 | 15 | 632 | 13.1% | 84.5% | R+71.4 |
| Precinct -MartintonMartinton | 96 | 372 | 4 | 472 | 20.3% | 78.8% | R+58.5 |
| Precinct -DanforthDanforth | 67 | 386 | 15 | 468 | 14.3% | 82.5% | R+68.2 |
| Precinct -ArtesiaArtesia | 84 | 371 | 12 | 467 | 18.0% | 79.4% | R+61.5 |
| Precinct -Ash GroveAsh Grove | 68 | 315 | 10 | 393 | 17.3% | 80.2% | R+62.8 |
| Precinct -IroquoisIroquois | 74 | 242 | 3 | 319 | 23.2% | 75.9% | R+52.7 |
| Precinct -CrescentCrescent | 62 | 249 | 6 | 317 | 19.6% | 78.5% | R+59.0 |
| Precinct -BeaverBeaver | 67 | 187 | 5 | 259 | 25.9% | 72.2% | R+46.3 |
| Precinct -ConcordConcord | 39 | 178 | 8 | 225 | 17.3% | 79.1% | R+61.8 |
| Precinct -PapineauPapineau | 37 | 183 | 5 | 225 | 16.4% | 81.3% | R+64.9 |
| Precinct -BeavervilleBeaverville | 51 | 151 | 1 | 203 | 25.1% | 74.4% | R+49.3 |
| Precinct -LovejoyLovejoy | 38 | 160 | 0 | 198 | 19.2% | 80.8% | R+61.6 |
| Precinct -RidgelandRidgeland | 38 | 113 | 0 | 151 | 25.2% | 74.8% | R+49.7 |
| Precinct -Fountain CreekFountain Creek | 15 | 130 | 3 | 148 | 10.1% | 87.8% | R+77.7 |
| Precinct -StocklandStockland | 15 | 101 | 7 | 123 | 12.2% | 82.1% | R+69.9 |
| Precinct -Milks GroveMilks Grove | 22 | 92 | 0 | 114 | 19.3% | 80.7% | R+61.4 |
| Precinct -Prairie GreenPrairie Green | 23 | 62 | 7 | 92 | 25.0% | 67.4% | R+42.4 |
| ARTESIA Voting District17_17075AR01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ASH GROVE Voting District17_17075AS01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ASHKUM 1 Voting District17_17075AU01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ASHKUM 2 Voting District17_17075AU02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BEAVER Voting District17_17075BO01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BEAVERVILLE Voting District17_17075BE01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BELMONT 1 Voting District17_17075BL01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BELMONT 2 Voting District17_17075BL02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BELMONT 3 Voting District17_17075BL03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHEBANSE 1 Voting District17_17075CH01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHEBANSE 2 Voting District17_17075CH02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CONCORD Voting District17_17075CO01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CRESCENT Voting District17_17075CR01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DANFORTH Voting District17_17075DA01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DOUGLAS 1 Voting District17_17075DO01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DOUGLAS 2 Voting District17_17075DO02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FOUNTAIN CREEK Voting District17_17075FC01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| IROQUOIS Voting District17_17075IR01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LODA Voting District17_17075LO01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LOVEJOY Voting District17_17075LV01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MARTINTON Voting District17_17075MA01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MIDDLEPORT 1 Voting District17_17075MD01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MIDDLEPORT 2 Voting District17_17075MD02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MIDDLEPORT 3 Voting District17_17075MD03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MIDDLEPORT 4 Voting District17_17075MD04 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MILFORD 1 Voting District17_17075MI01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MILFORD 2 Voting District17_17075MI02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MILKS GROVE Voting District17_17075ML01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ONARGA 1 Voting District17_17075ON01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ONARGA 2 Voting District17_17075ON02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PAPINEAU Voting District17_17075PA01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PIGEON GROVE Voting District17_17075PI01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRAIRIE GREEN Voting District17_17075PR01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Ashkum IAshkum I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Ashkum IIAshkum II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Belmont IBelmont I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Belmont IIBelmont II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Belmont IIIBelmont III | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Chebanse IChebanse I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Chebanse IIChebanse II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Douglas IDouglas I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Douglas IIDouglas II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Middleport IMiddleport I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Middleport IIMiddleport II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Middleport IIIMiddleport III | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Middleport IVMiddleport IV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Milford IMilford I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Milford IIMilford II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Onarga IOnarga I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Onarga IIOnarga II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Sheldon ISheldon I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Sheldon IISheldon II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RIDGELAND Voting District17_17075RI01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHELDON 1 Voting District17_17075SH01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHELDON 2 Voting District17_17075SH02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| STOCKLAND Voting District17_17075ST01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −1.1% |
| 1896 | −18.2% |
| 1900 | −16.2% |
| 1904 | −33.2% |
| 1908 | −22.9% |
| 1912 | +8.1% |
| 1916 | −25.4% |
| 1920 | −57.2% |
| 1924 | −44.4% |
| 1928 | −21.8% |
| 1932 | +19.7% |
| 1936 | +4.3% |
| 1940 | −22.0% |
| 1944 | −33.4% |
| 1948 | −30.2% |
| 1952 | −45.7% |
| 1956 | −45.9% |
| 1960 | −32.3% |
| 1964 | −14.6% |
| 1968 | −43.6% |
| 1972 | −52.4% |
| 1976 | −32.1% |
| 1980 | −51.4% |
| 1984 | −54.7% |
| 1988 | −38.7% |
| 1992 | −17.3% |
| 1996 | −15.7% |
| 2000 | −31.9% |
| 2004 | −44.0% |
| 2008 | −29.8% |
| 2012 | −44.5% |
| 2016 | −55.3% |
| 2020 | −56.7% |
| 2024 | −57.3% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 19,596 |
| 2018 | 18,585 |
| 2020 | 18,403 |
| 2022 | 18,837 |
| 2024 | 19,017 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+45 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −2,117 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $45,994 in average income, against $74,821 for residents who stayed — 39% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+12.2 on average — 45 points more Democratic-leaning than Iroquois County, IL itself (R+57.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Kankakee County, IL141R+20.8
- Ford County, IL41R+47.8
- Cook County, IL39D+41.6
- Champaign County, IL37D+23.8
- Vermilion County, IL33R+35.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Kankakee County, IL149
- Champaign County, IL71
- Vermilion County, IL50
- Ford County, IL45
- Cook County, IL27
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −137 |
| 2012 | −175 |
| 2013 | −244 |
| 2014 | −195 |
| 2015 | −99 |
| 2016 | −275 |
| 2017 | −310 |
| 2018 | −212 |
| 2019 | −302 |
| 2021 | −46 |
| 2022 | −114 |
| 2023 | −215 |
| 2024 | +162 |
| 2025 | +45 |
Iroquois County, a flat agricultural expanse in east-central Illinois, delivered a 57-point Republican presidential margin in 2024 — among the widest gaps in a state whose statewide results lean heavily the other direction.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 19.7 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 57.3 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 0.5 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 57.3 points.
A population of 26,449, a 87% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $66,255 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Ford County and Van Wert County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Iroquois County, Illinois. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/17075/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.