Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the city’s overall result across 2004–2024, on current city boundaries.
President results by year
Vote totals, margins, and source status
HarrisDemocratic31.0%402TrumpRepublican64.7%840OtherAll other candidates4.3%56
R+33.7
Lead
438
Total
1,298
vs nation
R+32.3
BidenDemocratic31.2%437TrumpRepublican65.9%922OtherAll other candidates2.9%40
R+34.7
Lead
485
Total
1,399
vs nation
R+39.1
ClintonDemocratic27.6%362TrumpRepublican63.1%827OtherAll other candidates9.2%121
R+35.5
Lead
465
Total
1,310
vs nation
R+37.6
ObamaDemocratic34.6%398RomneyRepublican64.2%739OtherAll other candidates1.2%14
R+29.6
Lead
341
Total
1,151
vs nation
R+33.5
ObamaDemocratic40.6%558McCainRepublican55.6%765OtherAll other candidates3.8%52
R+15.1
Lead
207
Total
1,375
vs nation
R+22.3
KerryDemocratic29.2%408BushRepublican70.8%987OtherAll other candidates0.0%0
R+41.5
Lead
579
Total
1,395
vs nation
R+39.0
Key facts
2024 presidential margin
R+33.7MIT Election Lab
Population
3,0282024 5-year
Population density
2,523 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
Land area
1.2 sq miTIGER/Line
Median household income
$49,4322024 5-year
White (non-Hispanic)
69.9%2024 5-year
Black
0.0%2024 5-year
Hispanic / Latino
1.8%2024 5-year
Peak Republican margin
R+41.5 in 2004MIT Election Lab
Participation
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
2024 turnout
64.7%1,331 participants ÷ 2,056 CVAP
2020→2022 drop-off
+28.9 ptsPresidential-dependent
Drop-off vs state
+9.7 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
Mechanical 2026
35.8%–47.8%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
0%20%40%60%80%
68.6%
37.7%
20042008201220162018202020222024
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
Cycle
Participants
CVAP
Turnout
Series
Quality
1,331
2,056 ± 196
64.7%
Audited
E/A
2022Mid
766
2,031 ± 195
37.7%
Audited
E/A
1,445
2,169 ± 182
66.6%
Audited
E/A
2018Mid
1,310
1,911 ± 183
68.6%
Audited
E/A
1,387
1,885 ± 192
73.6%
Audited
E/D
1,151
1,969
58.5%
Derived
—
1,375
2,305
59.7%
Derived
—
1,395
2,641 extrapolated
52.8%
Derived
—
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
2024: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 323/229.
2022: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 322/184.
2020: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 321/4.
2018: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 320/139.
2016: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 319/133.
2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
presidential history
Party record book
Cut Bank, MT · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
2004–2024 · 6 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
40.6%
558 votes · R+15.1
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2012 · 34.6%
Republican
George W. Bush2004
70.8%
987 votes · R+41.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 65.9%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
558votes
40.6% of the vote · R+15.1
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · 437 votes
Republican
George W. Bush2004
987votes
70.8% of the vote · R+41.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 922 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
−22.3pts D vs U.S.
Place R+15.1 · U.S. D+7.3
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · −32.3 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+39.1pts R vs U.S.
Place R+34.7 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · George W. Bush, 2004 · +39.0 pts
U.S. House elections · 2 House
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Cut Bank · which candidate this place backed in each party’s presidential nominating contest, cycle by cycle. A primary is a contest inside one party, so it has no Democratic–Republican margin and is not part of the general-election record above.
Akashic reports votes cast, not delegates awarded. The two can disagree: Clinton led the 2008 national primary popular vote by less than half a point and did not win the nomination.
Primary returns are published at county grain. The figures below are Glacier County, Montana, the county containing Cut Bank — Cut Bank’s own primary vote sits inside those totals and is not separately reported.
Presidential nominating contests in Cut Bank, by party and cycle.
○no contest record — Akashic holds no result for that party and cycle here. It is not a claim that no contest was held. Telling apart a contest that was cancelled, one that went uncontested, and one simply not yet ingested needs a nominating-contest calendar, which is a separate ingest from results and does not exist yet.
Republican presidential primaries are not yet ingested — the Republican series runs from 1856 and is in scope. The row is kept so its absence is visible: a Democratic-only panel would otherwise read as though no one else held a contest.
Akashic carries 10 states for 2012 and 3 states for 2024. Cycles in which an incumbent president seeks renomination are thin by nature — few states run a contested primary — so a sparse column is politics, not a hole in the record.
County returns carry a leader and a lead over the runner-up, and nothing more. The full candidate field with vote shares is published at state grain — follow a cycle above to the state contest for it.
Cut Bank sits at the edge of the Blackfeet Reservation and has long relied on petroleum extraction and agriculture, a economic mix that pushes local voting patterns toward resource-industry priorities even as tribal neighbors add a distinct demographic counterweight.
Across the recorded series it reached a Republican high of 41.5 points in 2004. Between 2020 and 2024 the city moved 0.9 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 33.7 points.
A population of 3,028, a 70% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $49,432 describe the city.
In 2024, Cut Bank, Montana voted Republican by 33.7 points (R+33.7), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 1,298 votes cast, 402 went Democratic and 840 went Republican.
How many people live in Cut Bank, Montana?
Cut Bank, Montana has a population of 3,028 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Cut Bank, Montana?
Median household income in Cut Bank, Montana is $49,432 — below the national median of $80,734. The Montana state median is $72,509.
What is the political history of Cut Bank, Montana?
Akashic tracks 6 presidential elections in Cut Bank, Montana from 2004 to 2024. Of those, 0 went Democratic and 6 went Republican.
