- Lead
- 3,829
- Total
- 25,876
- vs nation
- D+16.3
- Turnout
- 85.4%
Summit County, UT
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 85.4% of 31,004 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 4,992
- Total
- 26,289
- vs nation
- D+14.5
- Turnout
- 91.5%
- Lead
- 3,170
- Total
- 20,885
- vs nation
- D+13.1
- Turnout
- 78.8%
- Lead
- 812
- Total
- 17,597
- vs nation
- R+8.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,576
- Total
- 16,809
- vs nation
- D+8.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 959
- Total
- 15,312
- vs nation
- R+3.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,567
- Total
- 12,121
- vs nation
- R+13.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 310
- Total
- 9,319
- vs nation
- R+5.2
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- D+14.8MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 42,9702024 5-year
- Population density
- 23 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 1,871 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $138,1142024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 82.9%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.3%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 11.4%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+86.6 in 1896MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+44.8 in 1984MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Teton County, WY · twin score 93.4
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 85.4%26,482 participants ÷ 31,004 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +23.8 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- -1.5 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 61.6%–70.7%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 20,885 | 26,513 | 78.8% | C/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 20,471 | 27,943 | 73.3% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 26,851 | 29,352 | 91.5% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 20,547 | 30,381 | 67.6% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 26,482 | 31,004 | 85.4% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 148/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
59 precincts · 25,861 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -PARW7:3232 | 576 | 265 | 10 | 851 | 67.7% | 31.1% | D+36.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -DVN1:11 | 528 | 263 | 13 | 804 | 65.7% | 32.7% | D+33.0 |
| Precinct -PRM48:1010 | 432 | 342 | 9 | 783 | 55.2% | 43.7% | D+11.5 |
| Precinct -PKMN35:11 | 469 | 245 | 19 | 733 | 64.0% | 33.4% | D+30.6 |
| Precinct -HEE38:3232 | 514 | 171 | 13 | 698 | 73.6% | 24.5% | D+49.1 |
| Precinct -JERE37:3232 | 472 | 205 | 14 | 691 | 68.3% | 29.7% | D+38.6 |
| Precinct -RPL26:3232 | 484 | 185 | 18 | 687 | 70.5% | 26.9% | D+43.5 |
| Precinct -SUME30:3232 | 547 | 126 | 13 | 686 | 79.7% | 18.4% | D+61.4 |
| Precinct -JERW27:3232 | 397 | 253 | 14 | 664 | 59.8% | 38.1% | D+21.7 |
| Precinct -SLVR16:3232 | 474 | 171 | 7 | 652 | 72.7% | 26.2% | D+46.5 |
| Precinct -MHW40:3232 | 417 | 216 | 13 | 646 | 64.6% | 33.4% | D+31.1 |
| Precinct -FRAW28:1010 | 226 | 398 | 18 | 642 | 35.2% | 62.0% | R+26.8 |
| Precinct -HEW23:3232 | 415 | 194 | 12 | 621 | 66.8% | 31.2% | D+35.6 |
| Precinct -PINN39:3232 | 434 | 173 | 9 | 616 | 70.5% | 28.1% | D+42.4 |
| Precinct -QUAR6:11 | 428 | 180 | 8 | 616 | 69.5% | 29.2% | D+40.3 |
| Precinct -SML42:3232 | 411 | 179 | 7 | 597 | 68.8% | 30.0% | D+38.9 |
| Precinct -DVS31:11 | 395 | 183 | 3 | 581 | 68.0% | 31.5% | D+36.5 |
| Precinct -KAMN12:1010 | 230 | 331 | 15 | 576 | 39.9% | 57.5% | R+17.5 |
| Precinct -HOYT18:1010 | 120 | 416 | 16 | 552 | 21.7% | 75.4% | R+53.6 |
| Precinct -PKMS5:11 | 381 | 122 | 7 | 510 | 74.7% | 23.9% | D+50.8 |
| Precinct -LPNE9:1515 | 353 | 141 | 6 | 500 | 70.6% | 28.2% | D+42.4 |
| Precinct -SCRL44:3131 | 287 | 193 | 8 | 488 | 58.8% | 39.5% | D+19.3 |
| Precinct -SUMW10:3232 | 382 | 92 | 12 | 486 | 78.6% | 18.9% | D+59.7 |
| Precinct -OAKS14:2525 | 167 | 309 | 9 | 485 | 34.4% | 63.7% | R+29.3 |
| Precinct -WANE17:1010 | 174 | 299 | 10 | 483 | 36.0% | 61.9% | R+25.9 |
| Precinct -HEN25:11 | 69 | 398 | 7 | 474 | 14.6% | 84.0% | R+69.4 |
| Precinct -SSE13:2020 | 186 | 278 | 10 | 474 | 39.2% | 58.6% | R+19.4 |
| Precinct -KAMS12:2525 | 161 | 297 | 13 | 471 | 34.2% | 63.1% | R+28.9 |
| Precinct -LPNW9:33 | 326 | 135 | 9 | 470 | 69.4% | 28.7% | D+40.6 |
| Precinct -BTNN34:2525 | 252 | 183 | 8 | 443 | 56.9% | 41.3% | D+15.6 |
| Precinct -THAY4:11 | 294 | 123 | 13 | 430 | 68.4% | 28.6% | D+39.8 |
| Precinct -CLN19:1010 | 114 | 296 | 10 | 420 | 27.1% | 70.5% | R+43.3 |
| Precinct -OAKN14:1010 | 126 | 256 | 4 | 386 | 32.6% | 66.3% | R+33.7 |
| Precinct -SIDE33:11 | 288 | 79 | 5 | 372 | 77.4% | 21.2% | D+56.2 |
| Precinct -FRAE28:2525 | 85 | 277 | 6 | 368 | 23.1% | 75.3% | R+52.2 |
| Precinct -BTNS34:1010 | 253 | 100 | 3 | 356 | 71.1% | 28.1% | D+43.0 |
| Precinct -SSS11:2020 | 106 | 241 | 7 | 354 | 29.9% | 68.1% | R+38.1 |
| Precinct -CLS19:2525 | 58 | 281 | 10 | 349 | 16.6% | 80.5% | R+63.9 |
| Precinct -OLDN32:11 | 250 | 93 | 5 | 348 | 71.8% | 26.7% | D+45.1 |
| Precinct -SSW22:2020 | 91 | 248 | 9 | 348 | 26.1% | 71.3% | R+45.1 |
| Precinct -WNW17:22 | 223 | 111 | 13 | 347 | 64.3% | 32.0% | D+32.3 |
| Precinct -WAGN29:3232 | 245 | 89 | 5 | 339 | 72.3% | 26.3% | D+46.0 |
| Precinct -UPIN41:3232 | 206 | 126 | 5 | 337 | 61.1% | 37.4% | D+23.7 |
| Precinct -PROS3:11 | 225 | 104 | 7 | 336 | 67.0% | 31.0% | D+36.0 |
| Precinct -SCRU8:3131 | 190 | 139 | 5 | 334 | 56.9% | 41.6% | D+15.3 |
| Precinct -PARS7:2525 | 170 | 107 | 8 | 285 | 59.6% | 37.5% | D+22.1 |
| Precinct -CCRK20:1010 | 53 | 227 | 4 | 284 | 18.7% | 79.9% | R+61.3 |
| Precinct -WEBC21:2020 | 113 | 149 | 6 | 268 | 42.2% | 55.6% | R+13.4 |
| Precinct -RANS36:3232 | 163 | 81 | 3 | 247 | 66.0% | 32.8% | D+33.2 |
| Precinct -PRG45:3232 | 102 | 130 | 1 | 233 | 43.8% | 55.8% | R+12.0 |
| Precinct -KCYN43:3232 | 127 | 76 | 5 | 208 | 61.1% | 36.5% | D+24.5 |
| Precinct -PEOA15:2020 | 60 | 141 | 3 | 204 | 29.4% | 69.1% | R+39.7 |
| Precinct -NSN24:1010 | 24 | 171 | 3 | 198 | 12.1% | 86.4% | R+74.2 |
| Precinct -OLDS2:11 | 146 | 35 | 5 | 186 | 78.5% | 18.8% | D+59.7 |
| Precinct -MTRS55:2525 | 111 | 72 | 2 | 185 | 60.0% | 38.9% | D+21.1 |
| Precinct -ROCP54:1010 | 42 | 46 | 0 | 88 | 47.7% | 52.3% | R+4.5 |
| Precinct -PEW51:1010 | 13 | 17 | 1 | 31 | 41.9% | 54.8% | R+12.9 |
| Precinct -SCRU8:NS5NS5 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 25 | 60.0% | 40.0% | D+20.0 |
| Precinct -PRM48:N5AN5A | 4 | 11 | 0 | 15 | 26.7% | 73.3% | R+46.7 |
presidential history
Party record book
Summit County, UT · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1896–2024 · 33 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
William J. Bryan1896
93.3%
3,402 votes · D+86.6
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 61.9%
Republican
Ronald Reagan1984
71.8%
4,093 votes · R+44.8
Runner-up · Richard Nixon, 1972 · 69.9%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Joe Biden2020
15,244votes
58.0% of the vote · D+19.0
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · 14,612 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
10,783votes
41.7% of the vote · D+14.8
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 10,252 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
William J. Bryan1896
+92.6pts D vs U.S.
Place D+86.6 · U.S. R+6.1
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · +16.3 pts
Republican
Ronald Reagan1980
+32.4pts R vs U.S.
Place R+42.1 · U.S. R+9.7
Runner-up · William H. Taft, 1912 · +30.0 pts
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | D | 52.8%12,952 | 47.2%11,586 | 24,538 |
| 2020 | D | 55.4%13,546 | 44.6%10,893 | 24,439 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Summit County, UT registers Republican but votes Democratic — a 28-point gap between how voters register and how they vote, the signature of ancestral registration that trails realignment.
29,368 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−445 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +725 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $272,166 in average income, against $325,105 for residents who stayed — 16% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+5.4 on average — 9.4 points more Republican-leaning than Summit County, UT itself (D+14.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Salt Lake County, UT375D+10.2
- Wasatch County, UT174R+27.4
- Los Angeles County, CA66D+32.9
- Utah County, UT57R+39.8
- Orange County, CA39D+2.7
- Davis County, UT35R+24.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Salt Lake County, UT514
- Wasatch County, UT258
- Utah County, UT74
- Washington County, UT48
- Davis County, UT32
- Los Angeles County, CA31
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +540 |
| 2012 | +106 |
| 2013 | +240 |
| 2014 | +312 |
| 2015 | +127 |
| 2016 | +441 |
| 2017 | +360 |
| 2018 | +119 |
| 2019 | −133 |
| 2021 | +448 |
| 2022 | −432 |
| 2023 | −629 |
| 2024 | −329 |
| 2025 | −445 |
Summit County, anchored by Park City's resort economy and a high share of college-educated transplants, has posted double-digit Democratic margins in recent presidential cycles — a consistent outlier in one of the country's most reliably Republican states.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 86.6 points in 1896 and a Republican high of 44.8 points in 1984. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.2 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 14.8 points.
A population of 42,970, a 83% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $138,114 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Teton County and Los Alamos County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Summit County, Utah. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/49043/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.