Heber, UT, Utah
Akashic| Donald Trump ✓Republican | 50.4% | 22,278 |
|---|---|---|
| Kamala HarrisDemocratic | 47.6% | 21,071 |
| Chase OliverLibertarian | 2.0% | 881 |
County-level results (2 counties) — table
| County | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|
| Summit County, UT | Democratic | D+14.8 |
| Wasatch County, UT | Republican | R+27.4 |
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Other | Margin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 47.6%Harris21,071 | 50.4%Trump22,278 | 2.0%Oliver881 | 44,230 | ||
| D | 48.6%Biden21,431 | 47.7%Trump21,047 | 3.6%Jorgensen1,601 | 44,079 | ||
| D | 40.9%Clinton13,566 | 40.6%Trump13,448 | 18.5%McMullin6,137 | 33,151 | ||
| R | 37.7%Obama10,263 | 59.1%Romney16,104 | 3.2%Johnson870 | 27,237 | ||
| D | 49.0%Obama12,424 | 48.9%McCain12,386 | 2.1%Baldwin530 | 25,340 | ||
| R | 38.7%Kerry8,831 | 58.9%Bush13,439 | 2.4%Nader554 | 22,824 | ||
| R | 34.1%Gore6,077 | 56.1%Bush9,987 | 9.7%Nader1,732 | 17,796 | ||
| R | 40.9%Clinton5,551 | 44.9%Dole6,089 | 14.2%Perot1,921 | 13,561 | ||
| R | 29.5%Clinton4,055 | 36.1%Bush4,955 | 34.4%Perot4,725 | 13,735 | ||
| R | 38.0%Dukakis3,987 | 60.6%Bush6,368 | 1.4%Paul145 | 10,500 | ||
| R | 26.8%Mondale2,554 | 72.3%Reagan6,882 | 0.9%Bergland89 | 9,525 | ||
| R | 24.1%Carter2,178 | 67.8%Reagan6,129 | 8.1%Anderson732 | 9,039 | ||
| R | 34.3%Carter2,374 | 61.6%Ford4,256 | 4.1%Anderson283 | 6,913 | ||
| R | 25.2%McGovern1,529 | 70.1%Nixon4,255 | 4.7%Schmitz288 | 6,072 | ||
| R | 34.6%Humphrey1,902 | 61.7%Nixon3,393 | 3.7%Wallace205 | 5,500 | ||
| D | 53.9%Johnson2,917 | 46.1%Goldwater2,493 | 0.0% | 5,410 | ||
| R | 42.5%Kennedy2,283 | 57.5%Nixon3,087 | 0.0%Byrd1 | 5,371 | ||
| R | 31.6%Stevenson1,744 | 68.4%Eisenhower3,769 | 0.0% | 5,513 | ||
| R | 38.1%Stevenson2,231 | 61.9%Eisenhower3,632 | 0.0% | 5,863 | ||
| R | 49.6%Truman2,775 | 49.7%Dewey2,782 | 0.7%Thurmond38 | 5,595 | ||
| D | 54.2%Roosevelt3,010 | 45.7%Dewey2,537 | 0.1%Thomas4 | 5,551 | ||
| D | 55.9%Roosevelt3,717 | 44.0%Willkie2,929 | 0.1%Thomas4 | 6,650 | ||
| D | 59.5%Roosevelt3,643 | 40.1%Landon2,451 | 0.4%Lemke24 | 6,118 | ||
| D | 54.9%Roosevelt3,131 | 43.4%Hoover2,476 | 1.6%Thomas92 | 5,699 | ||
| R | 41.7%Smith2,233 | 57.7%Hoover3,088 | 0.5%Thomas28 | 5,349 | ||
| R | 31.7%Davis1,552 | 55.1%Coolidge2,702 | 13.2%La Follette649 | 4,903 | ||
| R | 36.2%Cox1,539 | 60.3%Harding2,564 | 3.5%Debs149 | 4,252 | ||
| D | 51.1%Wilson2,380 | 43.2%Hughes2,012 | 5.6%Benson261 | 4,653 | ||
| R | 33.3%Wilson1,940 | 42.9%Taft2,500 | 23.8%Roosevelt1,389 | 5,829 | ||
| R | 43.2%Bryan2,387 | 52.1%Taft2,879 | 4.7%Debs257 | 5,523 | ||
| R | 36.2%Parker2,014 | 58.8%Roosevelt3,274 | 5.1%Debs283 | 5,571 | ||
| D | 52.5%Bryan2,544 | 47.0%McKinley2,278 | 0.4%Woolley21 | 4,843 | ||
| D | 94.1%Bryan4,735 | 5.9%McKinley296 | 0.0% | 5,031 | ||
| — | — | — | — | — |
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1896 | +88.2% |
| 1900 | +5.5% |
| 1904 | −22.6% |
| 1908 | −8.9% |
| 1912 | −9.6% |
| 1916 | +7.9% |
| 1920 | −24.1% |
| 1924 | −23.5% |
| 1928 | −16.0% |
| 1932 | +11.5% |
| 1936 | +19.5% |
| 1940 | +11.8% |
| 1944 | +8.5% |
| 1948 | −0.1% |
| 1952 | −23.9% |
| 1956 | −36.7% |
| 1960 | −15.0% |
| 1964 | +7.8% |
| 1968 | −27.1% |
| 1972 | −44.9% |
| 1976 | −27.2% |
| 1980 | −43.7% |
| 1984 | −45.4% |
| 1988 | −22.7% |
| 1992 | −6.6% |
| 1996 | −4.0% |
| 2000 | −22.0% |
| 2004 | −20.2% |
| 2008 | +0.1% |
| 2012 | −21.4% |
| 2016 | +0.4% |
| 2020 | +0.9% |
| 2024 | −2.7% |
Heber City anchors a high-elevation valley where rapid in-migration from the Wasatch Front has layered newer suburban voters onto a historically heavily Republican agricultural base, tightening some local margins over the past decade.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 88.2 points in 1896 and a Republican high of 45.4 points in 1984. Between 2020 and 2024 the metro moved 3.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 2.7 points.
A population of 79,612, a 82% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $128,676 describe the metro. The metro's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Jackson, WY-ID and Los Alamos, NM.
The metros whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Heber, UT, Utah. Akashic. https://akashic.app/cbsa/25720/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.