- Lead
- 321,252
- Total
- 1,488,494
- vs nation
- R+20.1
- Turnout
- 66.0%
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+21.6MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 3,392,3312024 5-year
- Population density
- 41 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 82,596 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $95,1662024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 74.7%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.1%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 15.9%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+65.4 in 1896MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+52.2 in 1980MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Kansas, KS · twin score 76.9
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 66.0%1,513,398 participants ÷ 2,291,432 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +25.3 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- 0.0 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 40.7%–50.6%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 1,143,732 | 1,903,497 | 60.1% | C/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 1,082,972 | 1,982,911 | 54.6% | B/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 1,542,529 | 2,082,893 | 74.1% | B/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 1,074,344 | 2,204,522 | 48.7% | E/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 1,513,398 | 2,291,432 | 66.0% | C/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 147/110.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 279/137.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 282/1.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-state-v1:lower bound:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 284/182.
- 2024: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 155/227.
presidential history
Party record book
Utah · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1896–2024 · 33 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
William J. Bryan1896
82.7%
64,607 votes · D+65.4
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 69.3%
Republican
Ronald Reagan1984
74.5%
469,105 votes · R+49.8
Runner-up · Ronald Reagan, 1980 · 72.8%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Kamala Harris2024
562,566votes
37.8% of the vote · R+21.6
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · 560,282 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
883,818votes
59.4% of the vote · R+21.6
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 865,140 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
William J. Bryan1896
+71.5pts D vs U.S.
Place D+65.4 · U.S. R+6.1
Runner-up · Woodrow Wilson, 1916 · +17.8 pts
Republican
Mitt Romney2012
+51.7pts R vs U.S.
Place R+47.9 · U.S. D+3.9
Runner-up · George W. Bush, 2004 · +43.1 pts
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
| Year | Seats won | D % | R % | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R 4 | 32.5% | 62.8% | 1,448,677 | |
| R 4 | 32.2% | 63.1% | 1,063,258 | |
| R 4 | 35.3% | 61.0% | 1,432,232 | |
| D 1 · R 3 | 35.5% | 58.7% | 1,052,506 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 16 points more Democratic than the rolls.
1,774,984 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net domestic migration over time
+3,343 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +131,879 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −387 |
| 2012 | −777 |
| 2013 | +5,596 |
| 2014 | −255 |
| 2015 | +7,609 |
| 2016 | +19,852 |
| 2017 | +18,329 |
| 2018 | +16,083 |
| 2019 | +15,588 |
| 2021 | +30,249 |
| 2022 | +13,235 |
| 2023 | +547 |
| 2024 | +2,867 |
| 2025 | +3,343 |
The states whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Utah. Akashic. https://akashic.app/state/UT/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.