- Lead
- 2,266
- Total
- 9,399
- vs nation
- R+22.6
- Turnout
- 46.4%
Hardeman County, TN
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 46.4% of 20,350 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 1,580
- Total
- 10,063
- vs nation
- R+20.2
- Turnout
- 50.0%
- Lead
- 734
- Total
- 9,273
- vs nation
- R+10.0
- Turnout
- 45.5%
- Lead
- 617
- Total
- 10,439
- vs nation
- D+2.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 694
- Total
- 11,237
- vs nation
- R+1.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 981
- Total
- 10,466
- vs nation
- D+11.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,224
- Total
- 8,803
- vs nation
- D+13.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,898
- Total
- 8,231
- vs nation
- D+14.5
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+24.1MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 25,4332024 5-year
- Median household income
- $46,0692024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 53.1%2024 5-year
- Black
- 38.2%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.2%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+84.4 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+36.7 in 1972MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Chesterfield County, SC · twin score 95.3
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 46.4%9,434 participants ÷ 20,350 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +22.2 ptsPersistently low turnout
- Drop-off versus state
- -4.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 24.2%–31.3%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 9,405 | 20,670 | 45.5% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 7,677 | 20,395 | 37.6% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 10,142 | 20,294 | 50.0% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 5,699 | 20,515 | 27.8% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 9,434 | 20,350 | 46.4% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
12 precincts · 9,399 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -West BolivarWest Bolivar | 789 | 850 | 16 | 1,655 | 47.7% | 51.4% | R+3.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -MiddletonMiddleton | 193 | 1,378 | 11 | 1,582 | 12.2% | 87.1% | R+74.9 |
| Precinct -WhitevilleWhiteville | 661 | 387 | 12 | 1,060 | 62.4% | 36.5% | D+25.8 |
| Precinct -BolivarBolivar | 641 | 379 | 9 | 1,029 | 62.3% | 36.8% | D+25.5 |
| Precinct -Hickory ValleyHickory Valley | 155 | 526 | 3 | 684 | 22.7% | 76.9% | R+54.2 |
| Precinct -Grand JunctionGrand Junction | 432 | 184 | 5 | 621 | 69.6% | 29.6% | D+39.9 |
| Precinct -TooneToone | 146 | 442 | 6 | 594 | 24.6% | 74.4% | R+49.8 |
| Precinct -HebronHebron | 179 | 408 | 4 | 591 | 30.3% | 69.0% | R+38.7 |
| Precinct -SilertonSilerton | 48 | 399 | 2 | 449 | 10.7% | 88.9% | R+78.2 |
| Precinct -HornsbyHornsby | 34 | 380 | 5 | 419 | 8.1% | 90.7% | R+82.6 |
| Precinct -SaulsburySaulsbury | 98 | 292 | 2 | 392 | 25.0% | 74.5% | R+49.5 |
| Precinct -Dixie HillsDixie Hills | 151 | 168 | 4 | 323 | 46.7% | 52.0% | R+5.3 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +35.6% |
| 1896 | +21.8% |
| 1900 | +19.2% |
| 1904 | +30.8% |
| 1908 | +46.8% |
| 1912 | +52.4% |
| 1916 | +55.9% |
| 1920 | +42.1% |
| 1924 | +70.2% |
| 1928 | +49.1% |
| 1932 | +78.2% |
| 1936 | +84.4% |
| 1940 | +77.6% |
| 1944 | +62.7% |
| 1948 | +39.2% |
| 1952 | +37.0% |
| 1956 | +27.9% |
| 1960 | +3.1% |
| 1964 | +4.4% |
| 1968 | +9.3% |
| 1972 | −36.7% |
| 1976 | +26.8% |
| 1980 | +17.0% |
| 1984 | +1.1% |
| 1988 | −0.3% |
| 1992 | +19.8% |
| 1996 | +23.1% |
| 2000 | +13.9% |
| 2004 | +9.4% |
| 2008 | +6.2% |
| 2012 | +5.9% |
| 2016 | −7.9% |
| 2020 | −15.7% |
| 2024 | −24.1% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 36.0%3,141 | 64.0%5,584 | 8,725 |
| 2020 | R | 39.0%3,386 | 61.0%5,302 | 8,688 |
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 14,781 |
| 2018 | 14,231 |
| 2020 | 14,909 |
| 2022 | 14,759 |
| 2024 | 15,305 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−171 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −1,501 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $57,354 in average income, against $47,767 for residents who stayed — 20% higher. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+13.9 on average — 10 points more Democratic-leaning than Hardeman County, TN itself (R+24.1).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Shelby County, TN113D+25.4
- Madison County, TN70R+18.2
- Fayette County, TN67R+42.4
- McNairy County, TN22R+68.4
- Chester County, TN20R+64.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Madison County, TN84
- Shelby County, TN65
- Fayette County, TN52
- McNairy County, TN21
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −309 |
| 2012 | −238 |
| 2013 | −255 |
| 2014 | −336 |
| 2015 | −171 |
| 2016 | −202 |
| 2017 | −4 |
| 2018 | −144 |
| 2019 | −155 |
| 2021 | −65 |
| 2022 | +341 |
| 2023 | +155 |
| 2024 | +53 |
| 2025 | −171 |
Hardeman County sits in Tennessee's cotton-belt west, with a population split roughly evenly between Black and white residents — an unusual demographic profile that has historically kept margins tighter here than in neighboring rural counties, though the gap has grown sharply in recent cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 84.4 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 36.7 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 8.4 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 24.1 points.
A population of 25,433, a 53% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $46,069 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Chesterfield County and Richmond County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Hardeman County, Tennessee. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/47069/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.