HarrisDemocratic42.6%47,703TrumpRepublican54.6%61,109KennedyIndependent1.3%1,474
R+12.0- Lead
- 13,406
- Total
- 111,890
- vs nation
- R+10.5
- Turnout
- 76.8%
Akashiccounty
El Dorado County, CA
Office (updates table and map)
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
President results by year
2024 turnout 76.8% of 148,457 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic44.4%51,621TrumpRepublican53.2%61,838JorgensenLibertarian1.6%1,871
R+8.8- Lead
- 10,217
- Total
- 116,159
- vs nation
- R+13.2
- Turnout
- 80.4%
ClintonDemocratic38.3%36,404TrumpRepublican51.8%49,247JohnsonLibertarian5.3%5,027
R+13.5- Lead
- 12,843
- Total
- 95,149
- vs nation
- R+15.6
- Turnout
- 70.9%
ObamaDemocratic39.5%35,166RomneyRepublican57.3%50,973JohnsonLibertarian1.4%1,278
R+17.8- Lead
- 15,807
- Total
- 88,998
- vs nation
- R+21.6
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic43.4%40,529McCainRepublican53.9%50,314OtherAll other candidates2.6%2,466
R+10.5- Lead
- 9,785
- Total
- 93,309
- vs nation
- R+17.8
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic37.3%32,242BushRepublican61.2%52,878OtherAll other candidates1.4%1,244
R+23.9- Lead
- 20,636
- Total
- 86,364
- vs nation
- R+21.4
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic36.3%26,220BushRepublican58.3%42,045NaderGreen4.2%3,013
R+21.9- Lead
- 15,825
- Total
- 72,136
- vs nation
- R+22.5
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic36.3%22,957DoleRepublican51.8%32,759PerotReform8.0%5,077
R+15.5- Lead
- 9,802
- Total
- 63,196
- vs nation
- R+24.0
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+12.0MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 192,6622024 5-year
- Median household income
- $108,8452024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 73.1%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.8%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 14.5%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+59.0 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+35.8 in 1920MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Placer County, CA · twin score 93.1
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 76.8%114,003 participants ÷ 148,457 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +19.4 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -6.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 57.4%–66.7%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 97,024 | 136,940 | 70.9% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 98,891 | 141,081 | 70.1% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 117,102 | 145,562 | 80.4% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 89,823 | 147,069 | 61.1% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 114,003 | 148,457 | 76.8% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
142 precincts · 111,765 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -413-66413-66 | 609 | 1,133 | 39 | 1,781 | 34.2% | 63.6% | R+29.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -113-05113-05 | 800 | 886 | 65 | 1,751 | 45.7% | 50.6% | R+4.9 |
| Precinct -506-78506-78 | 616 | 1,063 | 56 | 1,735 | 35.5% | 61.3% | R+25.8 |
| Precinct -117-05117-05 | 829 | 795 | 55 | 1,679 | 49.4% | 47.3% | D+2.0 |
| Precinct -303-43303-43 | 624 | 1,004 | 44 | 1,672 | 37.3% | 60.0% | R+22.7 |
| Precinct -110-02110-02 | 629 | 1,006 | 36 | 1,671 | 37.6% | 60.2% | R+22.6 |
| Precinct -323-53323-53 | 775 | 846 | 44 | 1,665 | 46.5% | 50.8% | R+4.3 |
| Precinct -518-89518-89 | 932 | 647 | 60 | 1,639 | 56.9% | 39.5% | D+17.4 |
| Precinct -521-91521-91 | 1,041 | 534 | 44 | 1,619 | 64.3% | 33.0% | D+31.3 |
| Precinct -330-60330-60 | 528 | 1,015 | 45 | 1,588 | 33.2% | 63.9% | R+30.7 |
| Precinct -203-12203-12 | 674 | 851 | 47 | 1,572 | 42.9% | 54.1% | R+11.3 |
| Precinct -120-05120-05 | 677 | 855 | 39 | 1,571 | 43.1% | 54.4% | R+11.3 |
| Precinct -523-91523-91 | 1,108 | 409 | 47 | 1,564 | 70.8% | 26.2% | D+44.7 |
| Precinct -514-87514-87 | 969 | 493 | 52 | 1,514 | 64.0% | 32.6% | D+31.4 |
| Precinct -425-73425-73 | 463 | 992 | 41 | 1,496 | 30.9% | 66.3% | R+35.4 |
| Precinct -522-91522-91 | 891 | 512 | 54 | 1,457 | 61.2% | 35.1% | D+26.0 |
| Precinct -507-78507-78 | 527 | 876 | 46 | 1,449 | 36.4% | 60.5% | R+24.1 |
| Precinct -215-19215-19 | 821 | 600 | 14 | 1,435 | 57.2% | 41.8% | D+15.4 |
| Precinct -405-16405-16 | 471 | 923 | 41 | 1,435 | 32.8% | 64.3% | R+31.5 |
| Precinct -202-12202-12 | 627 | 772 | 28 | 1,427 | 43.9% | 54.1% | R+10.2 |
| Precinct -321-53321-53 | 734 | 633 | 41 | 1,408 | 52.1% | 45.0% | D+7.2 |
| Precinct -207-15207-15 | 598 | 767 | 37 | 1,402 | 42.7% | 54.7% | R+12.1 |
| Precinct -513-87513-87 | 857 | 484 | 56 | 1,397 | 61.3% | 34.6% | D+26.7 |
| Precinct -114-05114-05 | 640 | 703 | 38 | 1,381 | 46.3% | 50.9% | R+4.6 |
| Precinct -103-02103-02 | 609 | 734 | 36 | 1,379 | 44.2% | 53.2% | R+9.1 |
| Precinct -227-29227-29 | 509 | 822 | 37 | 1,368 | 37.2% | 60.1% | R+22.9 |
| Precinct -426-73426-73 | 556 | 787 | 25 | 1,368 | 40.6% | 57.5% | R+16.9 |
| Precinct -116-05116-05 | 655 | 682 | 25 | 1,362 | 48.1% | 50.1% | R+2.0 |
| Precinct -402-13402-13 | 412 | 912 | 28 | 1,352 | 30.5% | 67.5% | R+37.0 |
| Precinct -204-12204-12 | 553 | 762 | 31 | 1,346 | 41.1% | 56.6% | R+15.5 |
| Precinct -102-02102-02 | 592 | 685 | 55 | 1,332 | 44.4% | 51.4% | R+7.0 |
| Precinct -427-73427-73 | 442 | 865 | 19 | 1,326 | 33.3% | 65.2% | R+31.9 |
| Precinct -210-15210-15 | 566 | 722 | 36 | 1,324 | 42.7% | 54.5% | R+11.8 |
| Precinct -119-05119-05 | 603 | 657 | 49 | 1,309 | 46.1% | 50.2% | R+4.1 |
| Precinct -404-16404-16 | 441 | 830 | 31 | 1,302 | 33.9% | 63.7% | R+29.9 |
| Precinct -511-87511-87 | 805 | 447 | 50 | 1,302 | 61.8% | 34.3% | D+27.5 |
| Precinct -406-16406-16 | 436 | 822 | 28 | 1,286 | 33.9% | 63.9% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -111-03111-03 | 569 | 670 | 42 | 1,281 | 44.4% | 52.3% | R+7.9 |
| Precinct -106-02106-02 | 557 | 670 | 43 | 1,270 | 43.9% | 52.8% | R+8.9 |
| Precinct -208-15208-15 | 482 | 727 | 40 | 1,249 | 38.6% | 58.2% | R+19.6 |
| Precinct -209-15209-15 | 499 | 708 | 27 | 1,234 | 40.4% | 57.4% | R+16.9 |
| Precinct -333-63333-63 | 404 | 793 | 32 | 1,229 | 32.9% | 64.5% | R+31.7 |
| Precinct -308-47308-47 | 357 | 838 | 32 | 1,227 | 29.1% | 68.3% | R+39.2 |
| Precinct -219-21219-21 | 592 | 581 | 38 | 1,211 | 48.9% | 48.0% | D+0.9 |
| Precinct -419-69419-69 | 422 | 743 | 31 | 1,196 | 35.3% | 62.1% | R+26.8 |
| Precinct -423-73423-73 | 371 | 780 | 37 | 1,188 | 31.2% | 65.7% | R+34.4 |
| Precinct -320-53320-53 | 556 | 598 | 33 | 1,187 | 46.8% | 50.4% | R+3.5 |
| Precinct -508-78508-78 | 389 | 727 | 40 | 1,156 | 33.7% | 62.9% | R+29.2 |
| Precinct -311-48311-48 | 465 | 660 | 25 | 1,150 | 40.4% | 57.4% | R+17.0 |
| Precinct -104-02104-02 | 501 | 591 | 36 | 1,128 | 44.4% | 52.4% | R+8.0 |
| Precinct -417-69417-69 | 441 | 649 | 37 | 1,127 | 39.1% | 57.6% | R+18.5 |
| Precinct -201-12201-12 | 457 | 638 | 30 | 1,125 | 40.6% | 56.7% | R+16.1 |
| Precinct -422-72422-72 | 372 | 731 | 22 | 1,125 | 33.1% | 65.0% | R+31.9 |
| Precinct -109-02109-02 | 445 | 608 | 26 | 1,079 | 41.2% | 56.3% | R+15.1 |
| Precinct -316-50316-50 | 399 | 645 | 28 | 1,072 | 37.2% | 60.2% | R+22.9 |
| Precinct -424-73424-73 | 401 | 633 | 35 | 1,069 | 37.5% | 59.2% | R+21.7 |
| Precinct -118-05118-05 | 519 | 503 | 40 | 1,062 | 48.9% | 47.4% | D+1.5 |
| Precinct -108-02108-02 | 495 | 519 | 33 | 1,047 | 47.3% | 49.6% | R+2.3 |
| Precinct -403-13403-13 | 325 | 667 | 34 | 1,026 | 31.7% | 65.0% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -418-69418-69 | 385 | 606 | 26 | 1,017 | 37.9% | 59.6% | R+21.7 |
| Precinct -212-17212-17 | 274 | 681 | 20 | 975 | 28.1% | 69.8% | R+41.7 |
| Precinct -516-89516-89 | 614 | 318 | 29 | 961 | 63.9% | 33.1% | D+30.8 |
| Precinct -107-02107-02 | 454 | 475 | 17 | 946 | 48.0% | 50.2% | R+2.2 |
| Precinct -223-25223-25 | 281 | 624 | 22 | 927 | 30.3% | 67.3% | R+37.0 |
| Precinct -115-05115-05 | 355 | 541 | 25 | 921 | 38.5% | 58.7% | R+20.2 |
| Precinct -217-21217-21 | 421 | 469 | 16 | 906 | 46.5% | 51.8% | R+5.3 |
| Precinct -317-50317-50 | 296 | 580 | 24 | 900 | 32.9% | 64.4% | R+31.6 |
| Precinct -322-53322-53 | 491 | 381 | 28 | 900 | 54.6% | 42.3% | D+12.2 |
| Precinct -105-02105-02 | 391 | 479 | 22 | 892 | 43.8% | 53.7% | R+9.9 |
| Precinct -315-50315-50 | 275 | 580 | 26 | 881 | 31.2% | 65.8% | R+34.6 |
| Precinct -211-16211-16 | 271 | 575 | 17 | 863 | 31.4% | 66.6% | R+35.2 |
| Precinct -304-44304-44 | 296 | 549 | 17 | 862 | 34.3% | 63.7% | R+29.4 |
| Precinct -314-50314-50 | 311 | 516 | 28 | 855 | 36.4% | 60.4% | R+24.0 |
| Precinct -331-61331-61 | 244 | 552 | 20 | 816 | 29.9% | 67.6% | R+37.7 |
| Precinct -312-48312-48 | 265 | 510 | 12 | 787 | 33.7% | 64.8% | R+31.1 |
| Precinct -429-75429-75 | 281 | 475 | 24 | 780 | 36.0% | 60.9% | R+24.9 |
| Precinct -218-21218-21 | 412 | 357 | 7 | 776 | 53.1% | 46.0% | D+7.1 |
| Precinct -517-89517-89 | 490 | 237 | 19 | 746 | 65.7% | 31.8% | D+33.9 |
| Precinct -510-87510-87 | 443 | 254 | 28 | 725 | 61.1% | 35.0% | D+26.1 |
| Precinct -123-08123-08 | 277 | 422 | 15 | 714 | 38.8% | 59.1% | R+20.3 |
| Precinct -231-33231-33 | 210 | 477 | 20 | 707 | 29.7% | 67.5% | R+37.8 |
| Precinct -512-87512-87 | 426 | 236 | 20 | 682 | 62.5% | 34.6% | D+27.9 |
| Precinct -430-76430-76 | 225 | 429 | 18 | 672 | 33.5% | 63.8% | R+30.4 |
| Precinct -213-17213-17 | 224 | 431 | 8 | 663 | 33.8% | 65.0% | R+31.2 |
| Precinct -214-18214-18 | 348 | 266 | 14 | 628 | 55.4% | 42.4% | D+13.1 |
| Precinct -415-68415-68 | 266 | 257 | 11 | 534 | 49.8% | 48.1% | D+1.7 |
| Precinct -309-48309-48 | 241 | 261 | 12 | 514 | 46.9% | 50.8% | R+3.9 |
| Precinct -310-48310-48 | 215 | 278 | 20 | 513 | 41.9% | 54.2% | R+12.3 |
| Precinct -527-95527-95 | 326 | 145 | 14 | 485 | 67.2% | 29.9% | D+37.3 |
| Precinct -407-17407-17 | 155 | 304 | 9 | 468 | 33.1% | 65.0% | R+31.8 |
| Precinct -520-91520-91 | 289 | 140 | 9 | 438 | 66.0% | 32.0% | D+34.0 |
| Precinct -327-57327-57 | 146 | 259 | 13 | 418 | 34.9% | 62.0% | R+27.0 |
| Precinct -436-82436-82 | 138 | 263 | 16 | 417 | 33.1% | 63.1% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -401-12401-12 | 153 | 246 | 10 | 409 | 37.4% | 60.1% | R+22.7 |
| Precinct -220-22220-22 | 155 | 228 | 18 | 401 | 38.7% | 56.9% | R+18.2 |
| Precinct -433-79433-79 | 135 | 247 | 12 | 394 | 34.3% | 62.7% | R+28.4 |
| Precinct -229-31229-31 | 115 | 243 | 6 | 364 | 31.6% | 66.8% | R+35.2 |
| Precinct -124-09124-09 | 141 | 183 | 13 | 337 | 41.8% | 54.3% | R+12.5 |
| Precinct -504-34504-34 | 121 | 168 | 10 | 299 | 40.5% | 56.2% | R+15.7 |
| Precinct -233-35233-35 | 108 | 179 | 8 | 295 | 36.6% | 60.7% | R+24.1 |
| Precinct -505-35505-35 | 90 | 160 | 2 | 252 | 35.7% | 63.5% | R+27.8 |
| Precinct -205-13205-13 | 80 | 162 | 7 | 249 | 32.1% | 65.1% | R+32.9 |
| Precinct -437-83437-83 | 86 | 133 | 11 | 230 | 37.4% | 57.8% | R+20.4 |
| Precinct -112-04112-04 | 60 | 132 | 6 | 198 | 30.3% | 66.7% | R+36.4 |
| Precinct -206-14206-14 | 55 | 135 | 5 | 195 | 28.2% | 69.2% | R+41.0 |
| Precinct -421-71421-71 | 76 | 115 | 4 | 195 | 39.0% | 59.0% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct -230-32230-32 | 82 | 103 | 6 | 191 | 42.9% | 53.9% | R+11.0 |
| Precinct -305-45305-45 | 61 | 81 | 3 | 145 | 42.1% | 55.9% | R+13.8 |
| Precinct -301-42301-42 | 51 | 89 | 4 | 144 | 35.4% | 61.8% | R+26.4 |
| Precinct -307-47307-47 | 49 | 91 | 1 | 141 | 34.8% | 64.5% | R+29.8 |
| Precinct -439-85439-85 | 48 | 81 | 7 | 136 | 35.3% | 59.6% | R+24.3 |
| Precinct -416-68416-68 | 37 | 93 | 1 | 131 | 28.2% | 71.0% | R+42.7 |
| Precinct -329-59329-59 | 39 | 80 | 5 | 124 | 31.5% | 64.5% | R+33.1 |
| Precinct -228-30228-30 | 48 | 71 | 2 | 121 | 39.7% | 58.7% | R+19.0 |
| Precinct -334-64334-64 | 41 | 76 | 2 | 119 | 34.5% | 63.9% | R+29.4 |
| Precinct -222-24222-24 | 41 | 71 | 6 | 118 | 34.7% | 60.2% | R+25.4 |
| Precinct -216-20216-20 | 28 | 88 | 1 | 117 | 23.9% | 75.2% | R+51.3 |
| Precinct -236-38236-38 | 41 | 71 | 5 | 117 | 35.0% | 60.7% | R+25.6 |
| Precinct -414-67414-67 | 61 | 52 | 2 | 115 | 53.0% | 45.2% | D+7.8 |
| Precinct -431-77431-77 | 23 | 68 | 6 | 97 | 23.7% | 70.1% | R+46.4 |
| Precinct -503-28503-28 | 25 | 50 | 1 | 76 | 32.9% | 65.8% | R+32.9 |
| Precinct -434-80434-80 | 18 | 47 | 2 | 67 | 26.9% | 70.1% | R+43.3 |
| Precinct -408-17408-17 | 14 | 41 | 4 | 59 | 23.7% | 69.5% | R+45.8 |
| Precinct -502-27502-27 | 35 | 18 | 3 | 56 | 62.5% | 32.1% | D+30.4 |
| Precinct -313-49313-49 | 10 | 41 | 3 | 54 | 18.5% | 75.9% | R+57.4 |
| Precinct -225-27225-27 | 20 | 22 | 1 | 43 | 46.5% | 51.2% | R+4.7 |
| Precinct -226-28226-28 | 10 | 31 | 2 | 43 | 23.3% | 72.1% | R+48.8 |
| Precinct -306-46306-46 | 12 | 24 | 0 | 36 | 33.3% | 66.7% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -302-42302-42 | 13 | 21 | 0 | 34 | 38.2% | 61.8% | R+23.5 |
| Precinct -409-28409-28 | 16 | 15 | 2 | 33 | 48.5% | 45.5% | D+3.0 |
| Precinct -234-36234-36 | 3 | 24 | 1 | 28 | 10.7% | 85.7% | R+75.0 |
| Precinct -328-58328-58 | 10 | 18 | 0 | 28 | 35.7% | 64.3% | R+28.6 |
| Precinct -524-92524-92 | 11 | 11 | 2 | 24 | 45.8% | 45.8% | Exact tie |
| Precinct -412-66412-66 | 9 | 13 | 0 | 22 | 40.9% | 59.1% | R+18.2 |
| Precinct -435-81435-81 | 7 | 14 | 0 | 21 | 33.3% | 66.7% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -515-88515-88 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 20 | 65.0% | 30.0% | D+35.0 |
| Precinct -318-51318-51 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 19 | 47.4% | 52.6% | R+5.3 |
| Precinct -420-70420-70 | 4 | 11 | 2 | 17 | 23.5% | 64.7% | R+41.2 |
| Precinct -438-84438-84 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 17 | 70.6% | 23.5% | D+47.1 |
| Precinct -509-86509-86 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 17 | 70.6% | 29.4% | D+41.2 |
| Precinct -126-11126-11 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 16 | 31.3% | 68.8% | R+37.5 |
| Precinct -238-40238-40 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 40.0% | 60.0% | R+20.0 |
presidential history
Presidential margin, 1876–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1876 | +4.0% |
| 1880 | +3.4% |
| 1884 | +6.3% |
| 1888 | +3.7% |
| 1892 | +4.2% |
| 1896 | +19.0% |
| 1900 | +8.1% |
| 1904 | −16.6% |
| 1908 | +1.5% |
| 1912 | +59.0% |
| 1916 | +22.6% |
| 1920 | −35.8% |
| 1924 | −16.4% |
| 1928 | +10.4% |
| 1932 | +50.3% |
| 1936 | +52.5% |
| 1940 | +34.1% |
| 1944 | +20.4% |
| 1948 | +8.9% |
| 1952 | −20.8% |
| 1956 | −7.6% |
| 1960 | +0.9% |
| 1964 | +20.8% |
| 1968 | −9.3% |
| 1972 | −12.8% |
| 1976 | +1.1% |
| 1980 | −28.7% |
| 1984 | −31.2% |
| 1988 | −20.2% |
| 1992 | −7.5% |
| 1996 | −15.5% |
| 2000 | −21.9% |
| 2004 | −23.9% |
| 2008 | −10.5% |
| 2012 | −17.8% |
| 2016 | −13.5% |
| 2020 | −8.8% |
| 2024 | −12.0% |
DemocraticRepublican
Federal and statewide elections · 2 House · 35 Senate · 3 Senate special · 12 governor
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
voter registration
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Party registration · 2024R+11.5
Presidential vote · 2024R+12.0
Registration and the presidential vote track closely here — within 0.5 points.
133,171 registered voters · 2024 · down from 138,015 in 2022
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+140 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net +11,568 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $117,155 in average income, against $127,396 for residents who stayed — 8% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+17.5 on average — 29 points more Democratic-leaning than El Dorado County, CA itself (R+12.0).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Sacramento County, CA1,465D+19.7
- Placer County, CA392R+8.5
- Santa Clara County, CA249D+40.0
- Contra Costa County, CA209D+37.9
- Alameda County, CA183D+53.6
- Douglas County, NV137R+32.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Sacramento County, CA1,314
- Placer County, CA374
- Douglas County, NV201
- Washoe County, NV187
- San Diego County, CA137
- Los Angeles County, CA119
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −606 |
| 2012 | −641 |
| 2013 | +650 |
| 2014 | +1,318 |
| 2015 | +1,228 |
| 2016 | +1,206 |
| 2017 | +2,547 |
| 2018 | +1,964 |
| 2019 | +2,110 |
| 2021 | +2,739 |
| 2022 | −599 |
| 2023 | −752 |
| 2024 | +264 |
| 2025 | +140 |
Stretching from Sacramento's eastern suburbs into the High Sierra, El Dorado County blends exurban growth with rural ranching communities, producing a consistent Republican lean in federal races that has widened as the county's population shifted away from urban centers.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 59.0 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 35.8 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.2 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 12.0 points.
A population of 192,662, a 73% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $108,845 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Placer County and Douglas County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Placer County
California
93.1twin score
12-yr trendmedian incomecollege share≠ % Asian
Douglas County
Colorado
88.9twin score
12-yr trend2020–2024 trajectory% Asian≠ college share
Frederick County
Maryland
88.8twin score
12-yr trendmedian incomecollege share≠ median age
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
El Dorado County, California. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/06017/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
California at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did El Dorado County, California vote in 2024?
In 2024, El Dorado County, California voted Republican by 12.0 points (R+12.0), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 111,890 votes cast, 47,703 went Democratic and 61,109 went Republican.
When did El Dorado County, California last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which El Dorado County, California voted Democratic was 1976.
How many people live in El Dorado County, California?
El Dorado County, California has a population of 192,662 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in El Dorado County, California?
Median household income in El Dorado County, California is $108,845 — above the national median of $80,734. The California state median is $99,122.
What is the political history of El Dorado County, California?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in El Dorado County, California from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 19 went Democratic and 18 went Republican.