Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the city’s overall result across 2004–2024, on current city boundaries.
President results by year
Vote totals, margins, and source status
HarrisDemocratic41.9%791TrumpRepublican57.0%1,078OtherAll other candidates1.1%21
R+15.2
Lead
287
Total
1,890
vs nation
R+13.7
BidenDemocratic42.0%794TrumpRepublican56.6%1,071OtherAll other candidates1.4%26
R+14.6
Lead
277
Total
1,891
vs nation
R+19.1
ClintonDemocratic37.5%548TrumpRepublican57.3%836OtherAll other candidates5.2%76
R+19.7
Lead
288
Total
1,460
vs nation
R+21.8
ObamaDemocratic34.2%454RomneyRepublican62.8%834OtherAll other candidates3.1%41
R+28.6
Lead
380
Total
1,329
vs nation
R+32.4
ObamaDemocratic41.3%523McCainRepublican58.5%740OtherAll other candidates0.2%3
R+17.1
Lead
217
Total
1,266
vs nation
R+24.4
KerryDemocratic35.8%485BushRepublican62.8%852OtherAll other candidates1.4%19
R+27.1
Lead
367
Total
1,356
vs nation
R+24.6
Key facts
2024 presidential margin
R+15.2MIT Election Lab
Population
2,8912024 5-year
Population density
321 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
Land area
9 sq miTIGER/Line
Median household income
$80,3622024 5-year
White (non-Hispanic)
87.6%2024 5-year
Black
0.3%2024 5-year
Hispanic / Latino
10.4%2024 5-year
Peak Republican margin
R+28.6 in 2012MIT Election Lab
Participation
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
2024 turnout
73.3%1,890 participants ÷ 2,577 CVAP
2020→2022 drop-off
+6.6 ptsHigh-turnout, durable
Drop-off vs state
-12.5 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
Mechanical 2026
66.7%–70.3%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
0%20%40%60%80%
66.9%
60.6%
20042008201220162018202020222024
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
Cycle
Participants
CVAP
Turnout
Series
Quality
1,890
2,577 ± 283
73.3%
Audited
E/D
2022Mid
1,561
2,577 ± 314
60.6%
Audited
E/D
1,899
2,826 ± 305
67.2%
Audited
E/D
2018Mid
1,634
2,441 ± 215
66.9%
Audited
E/A
1,496
2,256 ± 177
66.3%
Audited
E/A
1,329
2,019
65.8%
Derived
—
1,266
2,255
56.1%
Derived
—
1,356
2,491 extrapolated
54.4%
Derived
—
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
2024: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 323/229.
2022: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 322/184.
2020: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 321/4.
2018: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 320/139.
2016: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 319/133.
2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
presidential history
Party record book
Wimberley, TX · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
2004–2024 · 6 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Joe Biden2020
42.0%
794 votes · R+14.6
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · 41.9%
Republican
George W. Bush2004
62.8%
852 votes · R+27.1
Runner-up · Mitt Romney, 2012 · 62.8%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Joe Biden2020
794votes
42.0% of the vote · R+14.6
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · 791 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
1,078votes
57.0% of the vote · R+15.2
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 1,071 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Kamala Harris2024
−13.7pts D vs U.S.
Place R+15.2 · U.S. R+1.5
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · −19.1 pts
Republican
Mitt Romney2012
+32.4pts R vs U.S.
Place R+28.6 · U.S. D+3.9
Runner-up · George W. Bush, 2004 · +24.6 pts
U.S. House elections · 1 House
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Wimberley · which candidate this place backed in each party’s presidential nominating contest, cycle by cycle. A primary is a contest inside one party, so it has no Democratic–Republican margin and is not part of the general-election record above.
Akashic reports votes cast, not delegates awarded. The two can disagree: Clinton led the 2008 national primary popular vote by less than half a point and did not win the nomination.
Primary returns are published at county grain. The figures below are Hays County, Texas, the county containing Wimberley — Wimberley’s own primary vote sits inside those totals and is not separately reported.
Presidential nominating contests in Wimberley, by party and cycle.
○no contest record — Akashic holds no result for that party and cycle here. It is not a claim that no contest was held. Telling apart a contest that was cancelled, one that went uncontested, and one simply not yet ingested needs a nominating-contest calendar, which is a separate ingest from results and does not exist yet.
Republican presidential primaries are not yet ingested — the Republican series runs from 1856 and is in scope. The row is kept so its absence is visible: a Democratic-only panel would otherwise read as though no one else held a contest.
Akashic carries 10 states for 2012 and 3 states for 2024. Cycles in which an incumbent president seeks renomination are thin by nature — few states run a contested primary — so a sparse column is politics, not a hole in the record.
County returns carry a leader and a lead over the runner-up, and nothing more. The full candidate field with vote shares is published at state grain — follow a cycle above to the state contest for it.
Wimberley sits in Hays County, one of Texas's fastest-growing corridors, drawing transplants from Austin while its registered voters have historically leaned toward competitive margins unusual for a rural Hill Country setting.
Across the recorded series it reached a Republican high of 28.6 points in 2012. Between 2020 and 2024 the city moved 0.5 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 15.2 points.
A population of 2,891, a 88% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $80,362 describe the city.
In 2024, Wimberley, Texas voted Republican by 15.2 points (R+15.2), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 1,890 votes cast, 791 went Democratic and 1,078 went Republican.
How many people live in Wimberley, Texas?
Wimberley, Texas has a population of 2,891 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Wimberley, Texas?
Median household income in Wimberley, Texas is $80,362 — below the national median of $80,734. The Texas state median is $78,476.
What is the political history of Wimberley, Texas?
Akashic tracks 6 presidential elections in Wimberley, Texas from 2004 to 2024. Of those, 0 went Democratic and 6 went Republican.
