- Lead
- 2,675
- Total
- 4,079
- vs nation
- R+64.1
- Turnout
- 55.2%
Latimer County, OK
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 55.2% of 7,404 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 2,675
- Total
- 4,249
- vs nation
- R+67.4
- Turnout
- 53.6%
- Lead
- 2,303
- Total
- 4,056
- vs nation
- R+58.9
- Turnout
- 49.8%
- Lead
- 1,458
- Total
- 3,798
- vs nation
- R+42.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,547
- Total
- 4,173
- vs nation
- R+44.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 590
- Total
- 4,480
- vs nation
- R+10.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 126
- Total
- 3,669
- vs nation
- D+2.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,033
- Total
- 4,003
- vs nation
- D+17.3
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+65.6MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 9,5182024 5-year
- Median household income
- $41,4052024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 60.8%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.2%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 4.1%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+62.2 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+65.6 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Pittsburg County, OK · twin score 95.3
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 55.2%4,085 participants ÷ 7,404 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +10.5 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -4.3 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 43.7%–44.7%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 4,084 | 8,193 | 49.8% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 3,046 | 8,150 | 37.4% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 4,262 | 7,947 | 53.6% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 3,181 | 7,373 | 43.1% | C/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 4,085 | 7,404 | 55.2% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
25 precincts · 4,079 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -390011390011 | 116 | 495 | 4 | 615 | 18.9% | 80.5% | R+61.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -390010390010 | 79 | 418 | 4 | 501 | 15.8% | 83.4% | R+67.7 |
| Precinct -390002390002 | 114 | 332 | 9 | 455 | 25.1% | 73.0% | R+47.9 |
| Precinct -390008390008 | 48 | 363 | 3 | 414 | 11.6% | 87.7% | R+76.1 |
| Precinct -390001390001 | 71 | 317 | 2 | 390 | 18.2% | 81.3% | R+63.1 |
| Precinct -390003390003 | 41 | 314 | 8 | 363 | 11.3% | 86.5% | R+75.2 |
| Precinct -390009390009 | 61 | 266 | 7 | 334 | 18.3% | 79.6% | R+61.4 |
| Precinct -390005390005 | 33 | 192 | 1 | 226 | 14.6% | 85.0% | R+70.4 |
| Precinct -390012390012 | 26 | 174 | 3 | 203 | 12.8% | 85.7% | R+72.9 |
| Precinct -390007390007 | 25 | 125 | 1 | 151 | 16.6% | 82.8% | R+66.2 |
| Precinct -390004390004 | 23 | 127 | 0 | 150 | 15.3% | 84.7% | R+69.3 |
| Precinct -390006390006 | 18 | 127 | 0 | 145 | 12.4% | 87.6% | R+75.2 |
| Precinct -390013390013 | 26 | 106 | 0 | 132 | 19.7% | 80.3% | R+60.6 |
| Voting District 140_400771 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 1040_4007710 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 1140_4007711 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 1240_4007712 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 240_400772 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 340_400773 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 440_400774 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 540_400775 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 640_400776 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 740_400777 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 840_400778 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 940_400779 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1908–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1908 | +7.1% |
| 1912 | +15.5% |
| 1916 | +14.7% |
| 1920 | −7.1% |
| 1924 | +18.0% |
| 1928 | +7.2% |
| 1932 | +62.2% |
| 1936 | +36.8% |
| 1940 | +32.3% |
| 1944 | +20.0% |
| 1948 | +46.8% |
| 1952 | +15.6% |
| 1956 | +18.0% |
| 1960 | +2.7% |
| 1964 | +46.0% |
| 1968 | +7.8% |
| 1972 | −32.9% |
| 1976 | +33.5% |
| 1980 | +9.3% |
| 1984 | −8.6% |
| 1988 | +12.6% |
| 1992 | +28.5% |
| 1996 | +25.8% |
| 2000 | +3.4% |
| 2004 | −13.2% |
| 2008 | −37.1% |
| 2012 | −38.4% |
| 2016 | −56.8% |
| 2020 | −63.0% |
| 2024 | −65.6% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 41 points more Democratic.
6,125 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+63 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −730 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $43,609 in average income, against $50,471 for residents who stayed — 14% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+64.0 on average — 1.6 points more Democratic-leaning than Latimer County, OK itself (R+65.6).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Le Flore County, OK53R+64.8
- Pittsburg County, OK43R+59.0
- Pushmataha County, OK20R+72.5
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Pittsburg County, OK61
- Le Flore County, OK58
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −7 |
| 2012 | −181 |
| 2013 | −211 |
| 2014 | +5 |
| 2015 | −145 |
| 2016 | −52 |
| 2017 | −189 |
| 2018 | −132 |
| 2019 | −109 |
| 2021 | +25 |
| 2022 | +161 |
| 2023 | +29 |
| 2024 | +13 |
| 2025 | +63 |
Latimer County, a rural Ouachita foothills community of roughly 10,700, delivered a 65-point Republican presidential margin in 2024, reflecting the sharp rightward consolidation that has reshaped small-town southeastern Oklahoma over the past two decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 62.2 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 65.6 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 65.6 points.
A population of 9,518, a 61% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $41,405 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Pittsburg County and Craig County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Latimer County, Oklahoma. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/40077/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.