Tulsa, OK, Oklahoma
Akashic| Donald Trump ✓Republican | 63.5% | 263,677 |
|---|---|---|
| Kamala HarrisDemocratic | 34.5% | 143,425 |
| Robert F. Kennedy Jr.Independent | 2.0% | 8,409 |
County-level results (7 counties) — table
| County | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|
| Creek County, OK | Republican | R+55.7 |
| Okmulgee County, OK | Republican | R+42.7 |
| Osage County, OK | Republican | R+41.4 |
| Pawnee County, OK | Republican | R+58.9 |
| Rogers County, OK | Republican | R+55.0 |
| Tulsa County, OK | Republican | R+15.2 |
| Wagoner County, OK | Republican | R+49.8 |
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Other | Margin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 34.5%Harris143,425 | 63.5%Trump263,677 | 2.0%Kennedy8,409 | 415,511 | ||
| R | 34.7%Biden145,348 | 62.8%Trump263,120 | 2.4%Jorgensen10,242 | 418,710 | ||
| R | 30.9%Clinton119,639 | 63.5%Trump246,001 | 5.6%Johnson21,685 | 387,325 | ||
| R | 33.9%Obama120,760 | 66.1%Romney235,706 | 0.0% | 356,466 | ||
| R | 35.6%Obama139,785 | 64.4%McCain253,154 | 0.0% | 392,939 | ||
| R | 35.7%Kerry139,223 | 64.3%Bush250,599 | 0.0% | 389,822 | ||
| R | 38.9%Gore127,627 | 59.7%Bush195,747 | 1.4%Buchanan4,538 | 327,912 | ||
| R | 39.2%Clinton121,451 | 50.4%Dole156,012 | 10.3%Perot31,988 | 309,451 | ||
| R | 31.9%Clinton112,854 | 45.9%Bush162,180 | 22.2%Perot78,409 | 353,443 | ||
| R | 38.7%Dukakis113,526 | 60.7%Bush178,139 | 0.6%Paul1,870 | 293,535 | ||
| R | 28.9%Mondale92,663 | 70.6%Reagan226,717 | 0.5%Bergland1,695 | 321,075 | ||
| R | 31.7%Carter87,354 | 63.6%Reagan175,540 | 4.7%Anderson13,034 | 275,928 | ||
| R | 41.8%Carter105,871 | 57.0%Ford144,342 | 1.2%McCarthy3,062 | 253,275 | ||
| R | 21.6%McGovern49,945 | 76.2%Nixon176,214 | 2.2%Schmitz5,075 | 231,234 | ||
| R | 26.2%Humphrey54,098 | 52.6%Nixon108,873 | 21.2%Wallace43,884 | 206,855 | ||
| R | 49.5%Johnson100,705 | 50.5%Goldwater102,844 | 0.0% | 203,549 | ||
| R | 38.8%Kennedy79,506 | 61.2%Nixon125,434 | 0.0% | 204,940 | ||
| R | 38.3%Stevenson72,465 | 61.7%Eisenhower116,927 | 0.0% | 189,392 | ||
| R | 42.6%Stevenson81,445 | 57.4%Eisenhower109,736 | 0.0% | 191,181 | ||
| D | 53.4%Truman75,676 | 46.6%Dewey65,909 | 0.0% | 141,585 | ||
| R | 48.0%Roosevelt66,403 | 51.9%Dewey71,715 | 0.1%Thomas194 | 138,312 | ||
| R | 49.5%Roosevelt74,518 | 50.2%Willkie75,649 | 0.3%Thomas401 | 150,568 | ||
| D | 61.4%Roosevelt87,245 | 38.1%Landon54,107 | 0.5%Lemke675 | 142,027 | ||
| D | 64.1%Roosevelt84,775 | 35.9%Hoover47,528 | 0.0% | 132,303 | ||
| R | 31.9%Smith38,440 | 67.6%Hoover81,419 | 0.5%Thomas554 | 120,413 | ||
| R | 44.8%Davis42,605 | 50.2%Coolidge47,755 | 5.1%La Follette4,842 | 95,202 | ||
| R | 41.1%Cox29,518 | 55.0%Harding39,491 | 3.9%Debs2,828 | 71,837 | ||
| D | 47.8%Wilson16,882 | 38.6%Hughes13,641 | 13.7%Benson4,826 | 35,349 | ||
| D | 45.4%Wilson11,412 | 39.5%Taft9,929 | 15.1%Roosevelt3,807 | 25,148 | ||
| R | 44.5%Bryan10,634 | 48.7%Taft11,636 | 6.9%Debs1,647 | 23,917 | ||
| — | — | — | — | — | ||
| — | — | — | — | — | ||
| — | — | — | — | — | ||
| — | — | — | — | — |
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1908 | −4.2% |
| 1912 | +5.9% |
| 1916 | +9.2% |
| 1920 | −13.9% |
| 1924 | −5.4% |
| 1928 | −35.7% |
| 1932 | +28.2% |
| 1936 | +23.3% |
| 1940 | −0.8% |
| 1944 | −3.8% |
| 1948 | +6.9% |
| 1952 | −14.8% |
| 1956 | −23.5% |
| 1960 | −22.4% |
| 1964 | −1.1% |
| 1968 | −26.5% |
| 1972 | −54.6% |
| 1976 | −15.2% |
| 1980 | −32.0% |
| 1984 | −41.8% |
| 1988 | −22.0% |
| 1992 | −14.0% |
| 1996 | −11.2% |
| 2000 | −20.8% |
| 2004 | −28.6% |
| 2008 | −28.9% |
| 2012 | −32.2% |
| 2016 | −32.6% |
| 2020 | −28.1% |
| 2024 | −28.9% |
Tulsa's metropolitan electorate has trended reliably Republican at the federal level for decades, but its urban core shows measurable Democratic concentration, with Native American voters—among the highest-share of any major metro—adding a distinct demographic layer to countywide margins.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 28.2 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 54.6 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the metro moved 0.8 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 28.9 points.
A population of 1,037,534, a 61% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $69,648 describe the metro. The metro's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Oklahoma City, OK and Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR.
The metros whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Tulsa, OK, Oklahoma. Akashic. https://akashic.app/cbsa/46140/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.