- Lead
- 737
- Total
- 1,130
- vs nation
- R+63.7
- Turnout
- 73.0%
Faulk County, SD
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 73.0% of 1,588 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 766
- Total
- 1,182
- vs nation
- R+69.3
- Turnout
- 66.1%
- Lead
- 654
- Total
- 1,118
- vs nation
- R+60.6
- Turnout
- 62.5%
- Lead
- 434
- Total
- 1,127
- vs nation
- R+42.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 313
- Total
- 1,192
- vs nation
- R+33.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 527
- Total
- 1,369
- vs nation
- R+36.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 516
- Total
- 1,329
- vs nation
- R+39.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 233
- Total
- 1,389
- vs nation
- R+25.3
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+65.2MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 2,1262024 5-year
- Median household income
- $57,7502024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 95.1%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.0%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 1.3%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+47.4 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+65.2 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Edmunds County, SD · twin score 89.4
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 73.0%1,160 participants ÷ 1,588 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +3.8 ptsHigh-turnout, durable
- Drop-off versus state
- -8.5 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 69.3%–70.1%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 1,158 | 1,854 | 62.5% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 1,094 | 1,814 | 60.3% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 1,206 | 1,825 | 66.1% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 994 | 1,595 | 62.3% | C/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 1,160 | 1,588 | 73.0% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
16 precincts · 1,130 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -77 | 54 | 210 | 9 | 273 | 19.8% | 76.9% | R+57.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -66 | 38 | 184 | 7 | 229 | 16.6% | 80.3% | R+63.8 |
| Precinct -11 | 37 | 133 | 4 | 174 | 21.3% | 76.4% | R+55.2 |
| Precinct -22 | 7 | 122 | 2 | 131 | 5.3% | 93.1% | R+87.8 |
| Precinct -33 | 14 | 107 | 1 | 122 | 11.5% | 87.7% | R+76.2 |
| Precinct -55 | 15 | 88 | 2 | 105 | 14.3% | 83.8% | R+69.5 |
| Precinct -44 | 18 | 76 | 2 | 96 | 18.8% | 79.2% | R+60.4 |
| VTD-precinct 1 Union-WesleyTwp-ChelseaTown-Devoe-Fairview-Cresbard Town1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-precinct 10 Ward 2 Faulkton City10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-precinct 11 Ward 3 Faulkton City11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-precinct 2 Entprs-Frdom-Emrson-Sartga-Pulsk-MyrnTwp2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-precinct 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-precinct 4 Irving-Orient-ArcadeTwp-OrientTown4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-precinct 5 Centrvil-Pioner-Hildal-ZllTwp-RckhmTown5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-precinct 6 Bryant-Tamworth-LafonTwp6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-precinct 9 Ward 1 Faulkton City9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −49.3% |
| 1896 | −28.8% |
| 1900 | −33.3% |
| 1904 | −58.3% |
| 1908 | −31.0% |
| 1912 | +47.4% |
| 1916 | −9.1% |
| 1920 | −48.6% |
| 1924 | −42.1% |
| 1928 | −25.3% |
| 1932 | +20.5% |
| 1936 | +11.5% |
| 1940 | −8.8% |
| 1944 | −9.8% |
| 1948 | −4.1% |
| 1952 | −37.4% |
| 1956 | −4.3% |
| 1960 | −8.6% |
| 1964 | +11.4% |
| 1968 | −8.8% |
| 1972 | −0.9% |
| 1976 | +10.1% |
| 1980 | −40.1% |
| 1984 | −31.9% |
| 1988 | −8.2% |
| 1992 | −11.9% |
| 1996 | −16.8% |
| 2000 | −38.8% |
| 2004 | −38.5% |
| 2008 | −26.3% |
| 2012 | −38.5% |
| 2016 | −58.5% |
| 2020 | −64.8% |
| 2024 | −65.2% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 15.5%205 | 84.5%1,121 | 1,326 |
| 2020 | R | 0.0%0 | 100.0%1,065 | 1,065 |
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration and the presidential vote track closely here — within 0.7 points.
1,539 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−14 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −51 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $64,829 in average income, against $88,975 for residents who stayed — 27% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −15 |
| 2012 | +4 |
| 2013 | −11 |
| 2014 | −23 |
| 2015 | −8 |
| 2016 | +16 |
| 2017 | −7 |
| 2018 | −16 |
| 2019 | −31 |
| 2021 | −2 |
| 2022 | +6 |
| 2023 | +31 |
| 2024 | +19 |
| 2025 | −14 |
Faulk County's sparse, agricultural population of roughly 2,600 has delivered Republican presidential margins above 60 points in multiple consecutive cycles, making it a reliable benchmark for measuring rural realignment on the northern plains.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 47.4 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 65.2 points in 2024. The 2024 margin was 65.2 points.
A population of 2,126, a 95% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $57,750 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Edmunds County and Kidder County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Faulk County, South Dakota. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/46049/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.