- Lead
- 63,091
- Total
- 182,411
- vs nation
- D+36.1
- Turnout
- 57.6%
Richland County, SC
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 57.6% of 319,138 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 74,257
- Total
- 193,822
- vs nation
- D+33.9
- Turnout
- 62.0%
- Lead
- 55,531
- Total
- 168,722
- vs nation
- D+30.8
- Turnout
- 56.4%
- Lead
- 50,884
- Total
- 159,154
- vs nation
- D+28.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 47,715
- Total
- 165,037
- vs nation
- D+21.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 20,071
- Total
- 133,801
- vs nation
- D+17.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 13,015
- Total
- 116,481
- vs nation
- D+10.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 13,130
- Total
- 95,230
- vs nation
- D+5.3
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- D+34.6MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 422,1172024 5-year
- Median household income
- $63,7842024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 39.4%2024 5-year
- Black
- 46.9%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 6.4%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+97.8 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+29.5 in 1972MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Shelby County, TN · twin score 98.3
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 57.6%183,839 participants ÷ 319,138 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +21.3 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- -0.3 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 36.3%–42.2%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 170,697 | 302,813 | 56.4% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 144,977 | 309,106 | 46.9% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 194,867 | 314,266 | 62.0% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 128,524 | 315,795 | 40.7% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 183,839 | 319,138 | 57.6% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
149 precincts · 182,411 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -LongcreekLongcreek | 3,020 | 1,739 | 72 | 4,831 | 62.5% | 36.0% | D+26.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Pontiac 2Pontiac 2 | 2,245 | 1,021 | 57 | 3,323 | 67.6% | 30.7% | D+36.8 |
| Precinct -Pontiac 1Pontiac 1 | 1,832 | 925 | 53 | 2,810 | 65.2% | 32.9% | D+32.3 |
| Precinct -Lake CarolinaLake Carolina | 1,765 | 908 | 47 | 2,720 | 64.9% | 33.4% | D+31.5 |
| Precinct -Blythewood 3Blythewood 3 | 1,821 | 821 | 32 | 2,674 | 68.1% | 30.7% | D+37.4 |
| Precinct -Spring HillSpring Hill | 565 | 2,013 | 41 | 2,619 | 21.6% | 76.9% | R+55.3 |
| Precinct -KillianKillian | 1,830 | 496 | 42 | 2,368 | 77.3% | 20.9% | D+56.3 |
| Precinct -Valley State ParkValley State Park | 1,999 | 309 | 37 | 2,345 | 85.2% | 13.2% | D+72.1 |
| Precinct -BookmanBookman | 1,531 | 734 | 32 | 2,297 | 66.7% | 32.0% | D+34.7 |
| Precinct -Ridge View 2Ridge View 2 | 1,712 | 478 | 39 | 2,229 | 76.8% | 21.4% | D+55.4 |
| Precinct -SandlapperSandlapper | 1,804 | 390 | 29 | 2,223 | 81.2% | 17.5% | D+63.6 |
| Precinct -WildewoodWildewood | 1,183 | 928 | 34 | 2,145 | 55.2% | 43.3% | D+11.9 |
| Precinct -RiverwalkRiverwalk | 1,307 | 772 | 40 | 2,119 | 61.7% | 36.4% | D+25.2 |
| Precinct -North Springs 2North Springs 2 | 1,391 | 659 | 41 | 2,091 | 66.5% | 31.5% | D+35.0 |
| Precinct -Spring ValleySpring Valley | 1,348 | 699 | 33 | 2,080 | 64.8% | 33.6% | D+31.2 |
| Precinct -Rice Creek 2Rice Creek 2 | 1,620 | 403 | 37 | 2,060 | 78.6% | 19.6% | D+59.1 |
| Precinct -Blythewood 2Blythewood 2 | 1,053 | 978 | 22 | 2,053 | 51.3% | 47.6% | D+3.7 |
| Precinct -Dutch Fork 3Dutch Fork 3 | 759 | 1,226 | 39 | 2,024 | 37.5% | 60.6% | R+23.1 |
| Precinct -Ridge View 1Ridge View 1 | 1,544 | 420 | 40 | 2,004 | 77.0% | 21.0% | D+56.1 |
| Precinct -Kelly MillKelly Mill | 1,270 | 699 | 31 | 2,000 | 63.5% | 34.9% | D+28.5 |
| Precinct -FairlawnFairlawn | 1,622 | 329 | 40 | 1,991 | 81.5% | 16.5% | D+64.9 |
| Precinct -Blythewood 1Blythewood 1 | 826 | 1,037 | 31 | 1,894 | 43.6% | 54.8% | R+11.1 |
| Precinct -WoodlandsWoodlands | 925 | 908 | 38 | 1,871 | 49.4% | 48.5% | D+0.9 |
| Precinct -Spring Valley WestSpring Valley West | 1,415 | 376 | 37 | 1,828 | 77.4% | 20.6% | D+56.8 |
| Precinct -Mallet HillMallet Hill | 1,207 | 512 | 32 | 1,751 | 68.9% | 29.2% | D+39.7 |
| Precinct -Springville 1Springville 1 | 487 | 1,222 | 26 | 1,735 | 28.1% | 70.4% | R+42.4 |
| Precinct -KingswoodKingswood | 1,446 | 236 | 41 | 1,723 | 83.9% | 13.7% | D+70.2 |
| Precinct -Ballentine 2Ballentine 2 | 553 | 1,116 | 20 | 1,689 | 32.7% | 66.1% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -Polo RoadPolo Road | 1,250 | 358 | 38 | 1,646 | 75.9% | 21.7% | D+54.2 |
| Precinct -Parkway 2Parkway 2 | 1,263 | 348 | 30 | 1,641 | 77.0% | 21.2% | D+55.8 |
| Precinct -Springville 2Springville 2 | 419 | 1,180 | 17 | 1,616 | 25.9% | 73.0% | R+47.1 |
| Precinct -Bridge CreekBridge Creek | 1,254 | 314 | 40 | 1,608 | 78.0% | 19.5% | D+58.5 |
| Precinct -Horrell HillHorrell Hill | 875 | 712 | 20 | 1,607 | 54.4% | 44.3% | D+10.1 |
| Precinct -BriarwoodBriarwood | 1,204 | 318 | 22 | 1,544 | 78.0% | 20.6% | D+57.4 |
| Precinct -Parkway 1Parkway 1 | 1,242 | 275 | 26 | 1,543 | 80.5% | 17.8% | D+62.7 |
| Precinct -Ward 13Ward 13 | 1,040 | 469 | 28 | 1,537 | 67.7% | 30.5% | D+37.2 |
| Precinct -ValhallaValhalla | 842 | 647 | 31 | 1,520 | 55.4% | 42.6% | D+12.8 |
| Precinct -MidwayMidway | 1,268 | 207 | 41 | 1,516 | 83.6% | 13.7% | D+70.0 |
| Precinct -EstatesEstates | 957 | 519 | 33 | 1,509 | 63.4% | 34.4% | D+29.0 |
| Precinct -PinewoodPinewood | 1,229 | 223 | 26 | 1,478 | 83.2% | 15.1% | D+68.1 |
| Precinct -North Springs 3North Springs 3 | 1,192 | 258 | 26 | 1,476 | 80.8% | 17.5% | D+63.3 |
| Precinct -WoodfieldWoodfield | 1,100 | 342 | 24 | 1,466 | 75.0% | 23.3% | D+51.7 |
| Precinct -Caughman RoadCaughman Road | 1,086 | 321 | 23 | 1,430 | 75.9% | 22.4% | D+53.5 |
| Precinct -LykeslandLykesland | 1,027 | 337 | 20 | 1,384 | 74.2% | 24.3% | D+49.9 |
| Precinct -Harbison 1Harbison 1 | 987 | 366 | 26 | 1,379 | 71.6% | 26.5% | D+45.0 |
| Precinct -Dutch Fork 4Dutch Fork 4 | 612 | 736 | 25 | 1,373 | 44.6% | 53.6% | R+9.0 |
| Precinct -Parkway 3Parkway 3 | 1,214 | 133 | 17 | 1,364 | 89.0% | 9.8% | D+79.3 |
| Precinct -Ward 17Ward 17 | 674 | 631 | 30 | 1,335 | 50.5% | 47.3% | D+3.2 |
| Precinct -Ward 25Ward 25 | 436 | 836 | 28 | 1,300 | 33.5% | 64.3% | R+30.8 |
| Precinct -MeadowfieldMeadowfield | 670 | 602 | 25 | 1,297 | 51.7% | 46.4% | D+5.2 |
| Precinct -Dutch Fork 2Dutch Fork 2 | 629 | 641 | 24 | 1,294 | 48.6% | 49.5% | R+0.9 |
| Precinct -Friarsgate 1Friarsgate 1 | 702 | 554 | 26 | 1,282 | 54.8% | 43.2% | D+11.5 |
| Precinct -Brandon 1Brandon 1 | 933 | 302 | 26 | 1,261 | 74.0% | 23.9% | D+50.0 |
| Precinct -Ballentine 1Ballentine 1 | 486 | 753 | 16 | 1,255 | 38.7% | 60.0% | R+21.3 |
| Precinct -Hopkins 2Hopkins 2 | 1,047 | 187 | 20 | 1,254 | 83.5% | 14.9% | D+68.6 |
| Precinct -Riversprings 3Riversprings 3 | 563 | 672 | 18 | 1,253 | 44.9% | 53.6% | R+8.7 |
| Precinct -MonticelloMonticello | 716 | 511 | 22 | 1,249 | 57.3% | 40.9% | D+16.4 |
| Precinct -Gregg ParkGregg Park | 756 | 473 | 16 | 1,245 | 60.7% | 38.0% | D+22.7 |
| Precinct -Ward 14Ward 14 | 806 | 412 | 27 | 1,245 | 64.7% | 33.1% | D+31.6 |
| Precinct -Rice Creek 1Rice Creek 1 | 1,050 | 173 | 18 | 1,241 | 84.6% | 13.9% | D+70.7 |
| Precinct -South Forest AcresSouth Forest Acres | 563 | 631 | 26 | 1,220 | 46.1% | 51.7% | R+5.6 |
| Precinct -Pine Lakes 2Pine Lakes 2 | 1,046 | 133 | 24 | 1,203 | 86.9% | 11.1% | D+75.9 |
| Precinct -Ward 4Ward 4 | 866 | 306 | 24 | 1,196 | 72.4% | 25.6% | D+46.8 |
| Precinct -KeenanKeenan | 856 | 315 | 23 | 1,194 | 71.7% | 26.4% | D+45.3 |
| Precinct -Dutch Fork 1Dutch Fork 1 | 400 | 777 | 15 | 1,192 | 33.6% | 65.2% | R+31.6 |
| Precinct -LongleafLongleaf | 1,035 | 144 | 9 | 1,188 | 87.1% | 12.1% | D+75.0 |
| Precinct -Pennington 2Pennington 2 | 624 | 529 | 20 | 1,173 | 53.2% | 45.1% | D+8.1 |
| Precinct -BluffBluff | 1,069 | 76 | 27 | 1,172 | 91.2% | 6.5% | D+84.7 |
| Precinct -Keels 1Keels 1 | 1,023 | 131 | 17 | 1,171 | 87.4% | 11.2% | D+76.2 |
| Precinct -DentsvilleDentsville | 1,039 | 115 | 15 | 1,169 | 88.9% | 9.8% | D+79.0 |
| Precinct -MeadowlakeMeadowlake | 1,078 | 66 | 25 | 1,169 | 92.2% | 5.6% | D+86.6 |
| Precinct -East Forest AcresEast Forest Acres | 494 | 632 | 22 | 1,148 | 43.0% | 55.1% | R+12.0 |
| Precinct -TrinityTrinity | 771 | 340 | 15 | 1,126 | 68.5% | 30.2% | D+38.3 |
| Precinct -Ward 16Ward 16 | 486 | 625 | 13 | 1,124 | 43.2% | 55.6% | R+12.4 |
| Precinct -ArcadiaArcadia | 673 | 408 | 31 | 1,112 | 60.5% | 36.7% | D+23.8 |
| Precinct -Ward 20Ward 20 | 871 | 201 | 36 | 1,108 | 78.6% | 18.1% | D+60.5 |
| Precinct -Riversprings 2Riversprings 2 | 602 | 477 | 19 | 1,098 | 54.8% | 43.4% | D+11.4 |
| Precinct -SatchelfordSatchelford | 492 | 582 | 16 | 1,090 | 45.1% | 53.4% | R+8.3 |
| Precinct -Friarsgate 2Friarsgate 2 | 579 | 490 | 17 | 1,086 | 53.3% | 45.1% | D+8.2 |
| Precinct -Brandon 2Brandon 2 | 882 | 180 | 23 | 1,085 | 81.3% | 16.6% | D+64.7 |
| Precinct -Ward 12Ward 12 | 711 | 341 | 26 | 1,078 | 66.0% | 31.6% | D+34.3 |
| Precinct -LincolnshireLincolnshire | 1,003 | 49 | 19 | 1,071 | 93.7% | 4.6% | D+89.1 |
| Precinct -HamptonHampton | 719 | 314 | 36 | 1,069 | 67.3% | 29.4% | D+37.9 |
| Precinct -North Springs 1North Springs 1 | 700 | 351 | 18 | 1,069 | 65.5% | 32.8% | D+32.6 |
| Precinct -Oak Pointe 1Oak Pointe 1 | 559 | 482 | 16 | 1,057 | 52.9% | 45.6% | D+7.3 |
| Precinct -Ward 10Ward 10 | 675 | 337 | 26 | 1,038 | 65.0% | 32.5% | D+32.6 |
| Precinct -GreenviewGreenview | 941 | 41 | 9 | 991 | 95.0% | 4.1% | D+90.8 |
| Precinct -Harbison 2Harbison 2 | 687 | 284 | 11 | 982 | 70.0% | 28.9% | D+41.0 |
| Precinct -Old FriarsgateOld Friarsgate | 574 | 387 | 12 | 973 | 59.0% | 39.8% | D+19.2 |
| Precinct -Ward 6Ward 6 | 629 | 321 | 22 | 972 | 64.7% | 33.0% | D+31.7 |
| Precinct -Mill CreekMill Creek | 740 | 203 | 11 | 954 | 77.6% | 21.3% | D+56.3 |
| Precinct -North Forest AcresNorth Forest Acres | 555 | 372 | 19 | 946 | 58.7% | 39.3% | D+19.3 |
| Precinct -Ward 3Ward 3 | 687 | 231 | 26 | 944 | 72.8% | 24.5% | D+48.3 |
| Precinct -CooperCooper | 435 | 477 | 13 | 925 | 47.0% | 51.6% | R+4.5 |
| Precinct -GadsdenGadsden | 828 | 78 | 15 | 921 | 89.9% | 8.5% | D+81.4 |
| Precinct -Hopkins 1Hopkins 1 | 771 | 131 | 18 | 920 | 83.8% | 14.2% | D+69.6 |
| Precinct -Riversprings 1Riversprings 1 | 338 | 570 | 11 | 919 | 36.8% | 62.0% | R+25.2 |
| Precinct -Pine Lakes 1Pine Lakes 1 | 812 | 84 | 12 | 908 | 89.4% | 9.3% | D+80.2 |
| Precinct -OlympiaOlympia | 616 | 275 | 16 | 907 | 67.9% | 30.3% | D+37.6 |
| Precinct -Pine GrovePine Grove | 748 | 118 | 13 | 879 | 85.1% | 13.4% | D+71.7 |
| Precinct -Keels 2Keels 2 | 759 | 82 | 14 | 855 | 88.8% | 9.6% | D+79.2 |
| Precinct -Ward 24Ward 24 | 383 | 457 | 12 | 852 | 45.0% | 53.6% | R+8.7 |
| Precinct -Pennington 1Pennington 1 | 287 | 547 | 16 | 850 | 33.8% | 64.4% | R+30.6 |
| Precinct -South BeltlineSouth Beltline | 578 | 250 | 16 | 844 | 68.5% | 29.6% | D+38.9 |
| Precinct -Ward 21Ward 21 | 762 | 58 | 15 | 835 | 91.3% | 6.9% | D+84.3 |
| Precinct -Ward 26Ward 26 | 521 | 293 | 18 | 832 | 62.6% | 35.2% | D+27.4 |
| Precinct -Ward 15Ward 15 | 464 | 342 | 24 | 830 | 55.9% | 41.2% | D+14.7 |
| Precinct -Ward 34Ward 34 | 489 | 316 | 9 | 814 | 60.1% | 38.8% | D+21.3 |
| Precinct -Oak Pointe 3Oak Pointe 3 | 458 | 343 | 12 | 813 | 56.3% | 42.2% | D+14.1 |
| Precinct -Ward 22Ward 22 | 724 | 53 | 22 | 799 | 90.6% | 6.6% | D+84.0 |
| Precinct -Ward 11Ward 11 | 575 | 205 | 18 | 798 | 72.1% | 25.7% | D+46.4 |
| Precinct -Trenholm RoadTrenholm Road | 382 | 394 | 15 | 791 | 48.3% | 49.8% | R+1.5 |
| Precinct -College PlaceCollege Place | 708 | 44 | 20 | 772 | 91.7% | 5.7% | D+86.0 |
| Precinct -WebberWebber | 511 | 244 | 10 | 765 | 66.8% | 31.9% | D+34.9 |
| Precinct -EdgewoodEdgewood | 701 | 47 | 7 | 755 | 92.8% | 6.2% | D+86.6 |
| Precinct -EastoverEastover | 645 | 94 | 14 | 753 | 85.7% | 12.5% | D+73.2 |
| Precinct -OakwoodOakwood | 403 | 330 | 19 | 752 | 53.6% | 43.9% | D+9.7 |
| Precinct -WestminsterWestminster | 610 | 128 | 10 | 748 | 81.6% | 17.1% | D+64.4 |
| Precinct -St. AndrewsSt. Andrews | 543 | 184 | 12 | 739 | 73.5% | 24.9% | D+48.6 |
| Precinct -Ward 23Ward 23 | 468 | 247 | 18 | 733 | 63.8% | 33.7% | D+30.2 |
| Precinct -Ward 1Ward 1 | 496 | 207 | 27 | 730 | 67.9% | 28.4% | D+39.6 |
| Precinct -Ward 29Ward 29 | 644 | 66 | 12 | 722 | 89.2% | 9.1% | D+80.1 |
| Precinct -Ward 30Ward 30 | 473 | 223 | 13 | 709 | 66.7% | 31.5% | D+35.3 |
| Precinct -WhitewellWhitewell | 584 | 96 | 24 | 704 | 83.0% | 13.6% | D+69.3 |
| Precinct -Parkridge 1Parkridge 1 | 392 | 295 | 8 | 695 | 56.4% | 42.4% | D+14.0 |
| Precinct -Ward 18Ward 18 | 524 | 120 | 24 | 668 | 78.4% | 18.0% | D+60.5 |
| Precinct -DennysideDennyside | 374 | 256 | 21 | 651 | 57.5% | 39.3% | D+18.1 |
| Precinct -GarnersGarners | 362 | 245 | 12 | 619 | 58.5% | 39.6% | D+18.9 |
| Precinct -McEntireMcEntire | 376 | 220 | 6 | 602 | 62.5% | 36.5% | D+25.9 |
| Precinct -Oak Pointe 2Oak Pointe 2 | 286 | 292 | 11 | 589 | 48.6% | 49.6% | R+1.0 |
| Precinct -RiversideRiverside | 439 | 132 | 18 | 589 | 74.5% | 22.4% | D+52.1 |
| Precinct -WaldenWalden | 460 | 103 | 9 | 572 | 80.4% | 18.0% | D+62.4 |
| Precinct -SkylandSkyland | 413 | 123 | 16 | 552 | 74.8% | 22.3% | D+52.5 |
| Precinct -Ward 5Ward 5 | 308 | 230 | 13 | 551 | 55.9% | 41.7% | D+14.2 |
| Precinct -Ward 19Ward 19 | 505 | 33 | 10 | 548 | 92.2% | 6.0% | D+86.1 |
| Precinct -Round TopRound Top | 335 | 186 | 10 | 531 | 63.1% | 35.0% | D+28.1 |
| Precinct -Ward 33Ward 33 | 389 | 113 | 13 | 515 | 75.5% | 21.9% | D+53.6 |
| Precinct -Parkridge 2Parkridge 2 | 313 | 187 | 8 | 508 | 61.6% | 36.8% | D+24.8 |
| Precinct -FairwoldFairwold | 468 | 23 | 4 | 495 | 94.5% | 4.6% | D+89.9 |
| Precinct -Ward 7Ward 7 | 458 | 20 | 14 | 492 | 93.1% | 4.1% | D+89.0 |
| Precinct -Ward 32Ward 32 | 445 | 24 | 9 | 478 | 93.1% | 5.0% | D+88.1 |
| Precinct -Ward 31Ward 31 | 439 | 30 | 8 | 477 | 92.0% | 6.3% | D+85.7 |
| Precinct -Hunting CreekHunting Creek | 260 | 171 | 7 | 438 | 59.4% | 39.0% | D+20.3 |
| Precinct -Ward 9Ward 9 | 359 | 20 | 13 | 392 | 91.6% | 5.1% | D+86.5 |
| Precinct -RidgewoodRidgewood | 348 | 17 | 15 | 380 | 91.6% | 4.5% | D+87.1 |
| Precinct -Beatty RoadBeatty Road | 299 | 66 | 5 | 370 | 80.8% | 17.8% | D+63.0 |
| Precinct -Ward 2Ward 2 | 251 | 71 | 8 | 330 | 76.1% | 21.5% | D+54.5 |
| Precinct -ArdincapleArdincaple | 237 | 20 | 2 | 259 | 91.5% | 7.7% | D+83.8 |
| Precinct -Ward 8Ward 8 | 116 | 4 | 3 | 123 | 94.3% | 3.3% | D+91.1 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +68.7% |
| 1896 | +32.1% |
| 1900 | +75.5% |
| 1904 | +81.8% |
| 1908 | +75.4% |
| 1912 | +88.2% |
| 1916 | +76.4% |
| 1920 | +78.4% |
| 1924 | +90.1% |
| 1928 | +75.3% |
| 1932 | +97.1% |
| 1936 | +97.8% |
| 1940 | +93.2% |
| 1944 | +91.1% |
| 1948 | +19.0% |
| 1952 | −28.3% |
| 1956 | −2.5% |
| 1960 | −27.9% |
| 1964 | −20.7% |
| 1968 | −15.6% |
| 1972 | −29.5% |
| 1976 | +5.9% |
| 1980 | −4.4% |
| 1984 | −17.9% |
| 1988 | −8.9% |
| 1992 | +9.3% |
| 1996 | +13.8% |
| 2000 | +11.2% |
| 2004 | +15.0% |
| 2008 | +28.9% |
| 2012 | +32.0% |
| 2016 | +32.9% |
| 2020 | +38.3% |
| 2024 | +34.6% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 255,661 |
| 2018 | 288,826 |
| 2020 | 305,202 |
| 2022 | 293,743 |
| 2024 | 293,507 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+1,666 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +12,331 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $57,511 in average income, against $78,185 for residents who stayed — 26% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+8.7 on average — 43 points more Republican-leaning than Richland County, SC itself (D+34.6).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Lexington County, SC2,753R+33.5
- Kershaw County, SC440R+28.2
- Mecklenburg County, NC402D+32.7
- Sumter County, SC315D+4.9
- Charleston County, SC287D+5.7
- York County, SC261R+19.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Lexington County, SC3,183
- Kershaw County, SC715
- Mecklenburg County, NC486
- Greenville County, SC328
- Charleston County, SC312
- Sumter County, SC236
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +664 |
| 2012 | +360 |
| 2013 | +1,017 |
| 2014 | +856 |
| 2015 | +2,569 |
| 2016 | +251 |
| 2017 | +161 |
| 2018 | +19 |
| 2019 | −833 |
| 2021 | +286 |
| 2022 | +2,492 |
| 2023 | +581 |
| 2024 | +2,242 |
| 2025 | +1,666 |
Richland County, seat of the state capital and the University of South Carolina, delivered one of the state's widest presidential margins in 2024, reflecting a heavily urban and college-educated electorate concentrated in Columbia.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 97.8 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 29.5 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.7 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 34.6 points.
A population of 422,117, a 39% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $63,784 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Shelby County and Muscogee County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Richland County, South Carolina. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/45079/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.