Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the city’s overall result across 2004–2024, on current city boundaries.
President results by year
Vote totals, margins, and source status
HarrisDemocratic40.6%516TrumpRepublican58.5%743OtherAll other candidates0.9%12
R+17.9
Lead
227
Total
1,271
vs nation
R+16.4
BidenDemocratic41.0%505TrumpRepublican57.7%712OtherAll other candidates1.3%16
R+16.8
Lead
207
Total
1,233
vs nation
R+21.2
ClintonDemocratic42.3%493TrumpRepublican55.1%642OtherAll other candidates2.7%31
R+12.8
Lead
149
Total
1,166
vs nation
R+14.9
ObamaDemocratic44.1%513RomneyRepublican54.9%639OtherAll other candidates0.9%11
R+10.8
Lead
126
Total
1,163
vs nation
R+14.7
ObamaDemocratic44.7%518McCainRepublican54.3%629OtherAll other candidates1.0%12
R+9.6
Lead
111
Total
1,159
vs nation
R+16.8
KerryDemocratic37.7%323BushRepublican62.2%533OtherAll other candidates0.1%1
R+24.5
Lead
210
Total
857
vs nation
R+22.0
Key facts
2024 presidential margin
R+17.9MIT Election Lab
Population
2,5152024 5-year
Population density
931 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
Land area
2.7 sq miTIGER/Line
Median household income
$36,7942024 5-year
White (non-Hispanic)
36.4%2024 5-year
Black
42.1%2024 5-year
Hispanic / Latino
18.4%2024 5-year
Peak Republican margin
R+24.5 in 2004MIT Election Lab
Participation
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
2024 turnout
69.7%1,282 participants ÷ 1,840 CVAP
2020→2022 drop-off
+18.5 ptsVolatile
Drop-off vs state
-5.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
Mechanical 2026
51.2%–52.4%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
0%20%40%60%80%100%
47.0%
37.8%
20042008201220162018202020222024
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
Cycle
Participants
CVAP
Turnout
Series
Quality
1,282
1,840 ± 358
69.7%
Audited
E/D
2022Mid
790
2,092 ± 375
37.8%
Audited
E/D
1,235
2,195 ± 270
56.3%
Audited
E/D
2018Mid
852
1,811 ± 218
47.0%
Audited
E/D
1,166
1,846 ± 194
63.2%
Audited
E/D
1,163
1,838
63.3%
Derived
—
1,159
1,606
72.2%
Derived
—
857
1,374 extrapolated
62.4%
Derived
—
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
2024: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 323/229.
2022: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 322/184.
2020: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 321/4.
2018: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 320/139.
2016: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 319/133.
2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
presidential history
Party record book
Grifton, NC · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
2004–2024 · 6 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
44.7%
518 votes · R+9.6
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2012 · 44.1%
Republican
George W. Bush2004
62.2%
533 votes · R+24.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 58.5%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
518votes
44.7% of the vote · R+9.6
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · 516 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
743votes
58.5% of the vote · R+17.9
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 712 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Barack Obama2012
−14.7pts D vs U.S.
Place R+10.8 · U.S. D+3.9
Runner-up · Hillary Clinton, 2016 · −14.9 pts
Republican
George W. Bush2004
+22.0pts R vs U.S.
Place R+24.5 · U.S. R+2.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · +21.2 pts
U.S. House elections · 1 House
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Grifton · how this place’s counties split between candidates in each party’s presidential nominating contest, cycle by cycle. A primary is a contest inside one party, so it has no Democratic–Republican margin and is not part of the general-election record above.
Akashic reports votes cast, not delegates awarded. The two can disagree: Clinton led the 2008 national primary popular vote by less than half a point and did not win the nomination.
Primary returns are published at county grain and there is no roll-up above it. Each cell counts how many of this place’s counties a candidate led — a count of records, not a vote total. Who led the place as a whole is not knowable from these returns, because county rows carry a leader and a lead but no per-candidate votes.
Presidential nominating contests in Grifton, by party and cycle.
○no contest record — Akashic holds no result for that party and cycle here. It is not a claim that no contest was held. Telling apart a contest that was cancelled, one that went uncontested, and one simply not yet ingested needs a nominating-contest calendar, which is a separate ingest from results and does not exist yet.
Republican presidential primaries are not yet ingested — the Republican series runs from 1856 and is in scope. The row is kept so its absence is visible: a Democratic-only panel would otherwise read as though no one else held a contest.
Akashic carries 10 states for 2012 and 3 states for 2024. Cycles in which an incumbent president seeks renomination are thin by nature — few states run a contested primary — so a sparse column is politics, not a hole in the record.
County returns carry a leader and a lead over the runner-up, and nothing more. The full candidate field with vote shares is published at state grain — follow a cycle above to the state contest for it.
Grifton sits at the Lenoir-Pitt county line, drawing its roughly 2,500 residents from an agricultural economy that shapes voter priorities around rural infrastructure and economic development more than statewide partisan trends.
Across the recorded series it reached a Republican high of 24.5 points in 2004. Between 2020 and 2024 the city moved 1.1 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 17.9 points.
A population of 2,515, a 36% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $36,794 describe the city.
In 2024, Grifton, North Carolina voted Republican by 17.9 points (R+17.9), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 1,271 votes cast, 516 went Democratic and 743 went Republican.
How many people live in Grifton, North Carolina?
Grifton, North Carolina has a population of 2,515 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Grifton, North Carolina?
Median household income in Grifton, North Carolina is $36,794 — below the national median of $80,734. The North Carolina state median is $72,388.
What is the political history of Grifton, North Carolina?
Akashic tracks 6 presidential elections in Grifton, North Carolina from 2004 to 2024. Of those, 0 went Democratic and 6 went Republican.
