- Lead
- 899
- Total
- 1,299
- vs nation
- R+67.7
- Turnout
- 77.2%
McPherson County, SD
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 77.2% of 1,726 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 853
- Total
- 1,324
- vs nation
- R+68.9
- Turnout
- 74.2%
- Lead
- 700
- Total
- 1,137
- vs nation
- R+63.7
- Turnout
- 64.6%
- Lead
- 649
- Total
- 1,215
- vs nation
- R+57.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 474
- Total
- 1,375
- vs nation
- R+41.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 816
- Total
- 3,271
- vs nation
- R+22.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 778
- Total
- 1,417
- vs nation
- R+55.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 617
- Total
- 1,735
- vs nation
- R+44.1
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+69.2MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 2,1452024 5-year
- Median household income
- $66,9062024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 96.8%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.0%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 0.1%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+61.9 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+74.0 in 1952MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Hyde County, SD · twin score 84.6
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 77.2%1,332 participants ÷ 1,726 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +10.1 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -2.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 67.0%–67.9%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 1,216 | 1,883 | 64.6% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 1,060 | 1,890 | 56.1% | A/D |
| 2020 · Presidential | 1,338 | 1,803 | 74.2% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 1,142 | 1,782 | 64.1% | C/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 1,332 | 1,726 | 77.2% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
16 precincts · 1,299 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -44 | 67 | 287 | 5 | 359 | 18.7% | 79.9% | R+61.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -11 | 46 | 293 | 5 | 344 | 13.4% | 85.2% | R+71.8 |
| Precinct -33 | 49 | 259 | 7 | 315 | 15.6% | 82.2% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -22 | 26 | 248 | 7 | 281 | 9.3% | 88.3% | R+79.0 |
| VTD-101 precinct46_46089VTD101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-Central precinctCN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-Eureka ward 1E1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-Eureka ward 2E2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-Eureka ward 3E3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-Leola town ward 1 (part of NE Leola precinct)L1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-Leola town ward 2 (part of NE Leola precinct)L2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-Leola town ward 3 (part of SE Leola precinct)L3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-Northeast Leola46_46089VTDNEL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-Northwest precinctNW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-Southeast Leola46_46089VTDSEL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD-Southwest precinctSW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −27.6% |
| 1896 | −17.2% |
| 1900 | −49.6% |
| 1904 | −62.4% |
| 1908 | −65.5% |
| 1912 | +32.9% |
| 1916 | −62.0% |
| 1920 | −67.4% |
| 1924 | −25.6% |
| 1928 | +8.6% |
| 1932 | +61.9% |
| 1936 | −10.4% |
| 1940 | −54.9% |
| 1944 | −69.6% |
| 1948 | −53.3% |
| 1952 | −74.0% |
| 1956 | −0.1% |
| 1960 | −58.5% |
| 1964 | −44.7% |
| 1968 | −65.5% |
| 1972 | −54.1% |
| 1976 | −40.9% |
| 1980 | −73.6% |
| 1984 | −62.4% |
| 1988 | −40.7% |
| 1992 | −26.7% |
| 1996 | −35.6% |
| 2000 | −54.9% |
| 2004 | −24.9% |
| 2008 | −34.5% |
| 2012 | −53.4% |
| 2016 | −61.6% |
| 2020 | −64.4% |
| 2024 | −69.2% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 13.1%196 | 86.9%1,302 | 1,498 |
| 2020 | R | 0.0%0 | 100.0%1,181 | 1,181 |
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration and the presidential vote track closely here — within 0.6 points.
1,675 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+21 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +32 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $51,087 in average income, against $70,764 for residents who stayed — 28% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +5 |
| 2012 | −11 |
| 2013 | +18 |
| 2014 | +4 |
| 2015 | −3 |
| 2016 | +30 |
| 2017 | +7 |
| 2018 | +2 |
| 2019 | −19 |
| 2021 | +30 |
| 2022 | −1 |
| 2023 | −46 |
| 2024 | −5 |
| 2025 | +21 |
McPherson County sits in the sparsely settled north-central plains, where a small, heavily rural electorate has produced some of the widest presidential margins in the state — R+69.2 in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 61.9 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 74.0 points in 1952. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.8 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 69.2 points.
A population of 2,145, a 97% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $66,906 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Hyde County and Smith County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
McPherson County, South Dakota. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/46089/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.