- Lead
- 2,163
- Total
- 3,736
- vs nation
- R+56.4
- Turnout
- 70.9%
Hutchinson County, SD
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 70.9% of 5,378 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 2,182
- Total
- 3,767
- vs nation
- R+62.4
- Turnout
- 70.0%
- Lead
- 1,825
- Total
- 3,365
- vs nation
- R+56.3
- Turnout
- 62.1%
- Lead
- 1,528
- Total
- 3,425
- vs nation
- R+48.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,043
- Total
- 3,608
- vs nation
- R+36.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,722
- Total
- 4,147
- vs nation
- R+39.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,445
- Total
- 3,625
- vs nation
- R+40.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 892
- Total
- 3,911
- vs nation
- R+31.3
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+57.9MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 7,4042024 5-year
- Median household income
- $73,9772024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 90.8%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.1%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.7%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+40.9 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+68.9 in 1944MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Thayer County, NE · twin score 88.4
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 70.9%3,811 participants ÷ 5,378 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +10.3 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -2.0 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 60.6%–65.0%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 3,421 | 5,506 | 62.1% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 3,320 | 5,475 | 60.6% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 3,799 | 5,431 | 70.0% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 3,248 | 5,442 | 59.7% | C/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 3,811 | 5,378 | 70.9% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
13 precincts · 3,736 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -22 | 226 | 696 | 21 | 943 | 24.0% | 73.8% | R+49.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -44 | 205 | 539 | 13 | 757 | 27.1% | 71.2% | R+44.1 |
| Precinct -11 | 113 | 593 | 7 | 713 | 15.8% | 83.2% | R+67.3 |
| Precinct -33 | 105 | 423 | 12 | 540 | 19.4% | 78.3% | R+58.9 |
| Precinct -55 | 68 | 379 | 7 | 454 | 15.0% | 83.5% | R+68.5 |
| Precinct -66 | 38 | 288 | 3 | 329 | 11.6% | 87.5% | R+76.0 |
| VTD precinct 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD precinct 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD precinct 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD precinct 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD precinct 5 City of Parkston5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD precinct 66 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VTD precinct 77 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −48.6% |
| 1896 | −50.7% |
| 1900 | −47.8% |
| 1904 | −63.6% |
| 1908 | −40.7% |
| 1912 | +30.2% |
| 1916 | −50.0% |
| 1920 | −44.5% |
| 1924 | −19.7% |
| 1928 | −6.1% |
| 1932 | +40.9% |
| 1936 | −5.2% |
| 1940 | −64.2% |
| 1944 | −68.9% |
| 1948 | −40.9% |
| 1952 | −66.3% |
| 1956 | −46.3% |
| 1960 | −43.4% |
| 1964 | −13.7% |
| 1968 | −41.6% |
| 1972 | −15.8% |
| 1976 | −15.5% |
| 1980 | −51.0% |
| 1984 | −46.2% |
| 1988 | −25.6% |
| 1992 | −19.0% |
| 1996 | −22.8% |
| 2000 | −39.9% |
| 2004 | −41.5% |
| 2008 | −28.9% |
| 2012 | −44.6% |
| 2016 | −54.2% |
| 2020 | −57.9% |
| 2024 | −57.9% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 14.6%655 | 85.4%3,826 | 4,481 |
| 2020 | R | 0.0%0 | 100.0%3,301 | 3,301 |
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration and the presidential vote track closely here — within 1.0 points.
4,983 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+9 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +4 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $46,459 in average income, against $86,116 for residents who stayed — 46% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+25.0 on average — 33 points more Democratic-leaning than Hutchinson County, SD itself (R+57.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Minnehaha County, SD26R+12.7
- Davison County, SD25R+37.8
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Davison County, SD26
- Minnehaha County, SD22
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −47 |
| 2012 | +9 |
| 2013 | −34 |
| 2014 | +35 |
| 2015 | +42 |
| 2016 | +55 |
| 2017 | −5 |
| 2018 | −57 |
| 2019 | −30 |
| 2021 | +1 |
| 2022 | −9 |
| 2023 | +39 |
| 2024 | −4 |
| 2025 | +9 |
Hutchinson County's German-Russian settler heritage anchors a deeply rural agricultural community where Republican presidential margins have exceeded 50 points in multiple consecutive cycles, making it among the state's most predictable precincts.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 40.9 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 68.9 points in 1944. The 2024 margin was 57.9 points.
A population of 7,404, a 91% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $73,977 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Thayer County and Walworth County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Hutchinson County, South Dakota. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/46067/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.