- Lead
- 7,766
- Total
- 30,070
- vs nation
- R+24.4
- Turnout
- 52.9%
Yuba County, CA
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 52.9% of 57,585 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 6,446
- Total
- 29,796
- vs nation
- R+26.1
- Turnout
- 57.7%
- Lead
- 5,260
- Total
- 22,998
- vs nation
- R+25.0
- Turnout
- 48.3%
- Lead
- 3,564
- Total
- 19,761
- vs nation
- R+21.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,141
- Total
- 21,401
- vs nation
- R+21.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 6,389
- Total
- 18,024
- vs nation
- R+33.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,292
- Total
- 16,127
- vs nation
- R+27.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,182
- Total
- 15,470
- vs nation
- R+22.6
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+25.8MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 84,5072024 5-year
- Median household income
- $76,3732024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 49.0%2024 5-year
- Black
- 3.8%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 30.8%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+50.2 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+46.2 in 1920MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Sutter County, CA · twin score 90.8
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 52.9%30,443 participants ÷ 57,585 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +21.8 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- -4.2 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 31.0%–37.4%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 23,558 | 48,746 | 48.3% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 19,643 | 50,178 | 39.1% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 30,201 | 52,381 | 57.7% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 19,886 | 55,537 | 35.8% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 30,443 | 57,585 | 52.9% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
33 precincts · 30,070 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -84018401 | 845 | 1,048 | 68 | 1,961 | 43.1% | 53.4% | R+10.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -95129512 | 454 | 1,343 | 38 | 1,835 | 24.7% | 73.2% | R+48.4 |
| Precinct -84028402 | 820 | 930 | 63 | 1,813 | 45.2% | 51.3% | R+6.1 |
| Precinct -84058405 | 499 | 1,135 | 52 | 1,686 | 29.6% | 67.3% | R+37.7 |
| Precinct -81038103 | 675 | 918 | 44 | 1,637 | 41.2% | 56.1% | R+14.8 |
| Precinct -84038403 | 625 | 941 | 50 | 1,616 | 38.7% | 58.2% | R+19.6 |
| Precinct -83038303 | 540 | 909 | 37 | 1,486 | 36.3% | 61.2% | R+24.8 |
| Precinct -82028202 | 515 | 916 | 47 | 1,478 | 34.8% | 62.0% | R+27.1 |
| Precinct -85028502 | 310 | 1,086 | 27 | 1,423 | 21.8% | 76.3% | R+54.5 |
| Precinct -82038203 | 430 | 827 | 46 | 1,303 | 33.0% | 63.5% | R+30.5 |
| Precinct -85048504 | 237 | 1,029 | 23 | 1,289 | 18.4% | 79.8% | R+61.4 |
| Precinct -84048404 | 436 | 788 | 28 | 1,252 | 34.8% | 62.9% | R+28.1 |
| Precinct -82048204 | 513 | 691 | 44 | 1,248 | 41.1% | 55.4% | R+14.3 |
| Precinct -83028302 | 476 | 674 | 27 | 1,177 | 40.4% | 57.3% | R+16.8 |
| Precinct -85018501 | 575 | 551 | 40 | 1,166 | 49.3% | 47.3% | D+2.1 |
| Precinct -81028102 | 402 | 525 | 34 | 961 | 41.8% | 54.6% | R+12.8 |
| Precinct -81018101 | 353 | 459 | 21 | 833 | 42.4% | 55.1% | R+12.7 |
| Precinct -83018301 | 289 | 457 | 21 | 767 | 37.7% | 59.6% | R+21.9 |
| Precinct -81048104 | 247 | 405 | 25 | 677 | 36.5% | 59.8% | R+23.3 |
| Precinct -81058105 | 282 | 358 | 17 | 657 | 42.9% | 54.5% | R+11.6 |
| Precinct -83048304 | 218 | 410 | 15 | 643 | 33.9% | 63.8% | R+29.9 |
| Precinct -85038503 | 126 | 440 | 9 | 575 | 21.9% | 76.5% | R+54.6 |
| Precinct -82018201 | 231 | 305 | 17 | 553 | 41.8% | 55.2% | R+13.4 |
| Precinct -82058205 | 128 | 286 | 16 | 430 | 29.8% | 66.5% | R+36.7 |
| Precinct -85078507 | 157 | 163 | 15 | 335 | 46.9% | 48.7% | R+1.8 |
| Precinct -84068406 | 44 | 172 | 7 | 223 | 19.7% | 77.1% | R+57.4 |
| Precinct -95139513 | 35 | 143 | 4 | 182 | 19.2% | 78.6% | R+59.3 |
| Precinct -95109510 | 61 | 107 | 6 | 174 | 35.1% | 61.5% | R+26.4 |
| Precinct -85088508 | 39 | 121 | 3 | 163 | 23.9% | 74.2% | R+50.3 |
| Precinct -95119511 | 34 | 115 | 6 | 155 | 21.9% | 74.2% | R+52.3 |
| Precinct -92069206 | 26 | 102 | 0 | 128 | 20.3% | 79.7% | R+59.4 |
| Precinct -95149514 | 62 | 59 | 3 | 124 | 50.0% | 47.6% | D+2.4 |
| Precinct -95099509 | 41 | 78 | 1 | 120 | 34.2% | 65.0% | R+30.8 |
Presidential margin, 1876–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1876 | −7.5% |
| 1880 | +0.8% |
| 1884 | −7.2% |
| 1888 | +1.6% |
| 1892 | +5.0% |
| 1896 | −9.5% |
| 1900 | −9.5% |
| 1904 | −30.9% |
| 1908 | −16.0% |
| 1912 | +47.6% |
| 1916 | +12.4% |
| 1920 | −46.2% |
| 1924 | −34.6% |
| 1928 | −0.8% |
| 1932 | +43.7% |
| 1936 | +50.2% |
| 1940 | +30.3% |
| 1944 | +15.5% |
| 1948 | +2.8% |
| 1952 | −21.6% |
| 1956 | −11.8% |
| 1960 | −4.0% |
| 1964 | +15.4% |
| 1968 | −8.2% |
| 1972 | −18.8% |
| 1976 | +7.8% |
| 1980 | −21.6% |
| 1984 | −28.8% |
| 1988 | −24.0% |
| 1992 | −9.2% |
| 1996 | −14.1% |
| 2000 | −26.6% |
| 2004 | −35.4% |
| 2008 | −14.7% |
| 2012 | −18.0% |
| 2016 | −22.9% |
| 2020 | −21.6% |
| 2024 | −25.8% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 14 points more Democratic.
43,136 registered voters · 2024 · up from 40,818 in 2022
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+856 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +4,351 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $57,869 in average income, against $63,952 for residents who stayed — 10% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+2.9 on average — 29 points more Democratic-leaning than Yuba County, CA itself (R+25.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Sacramento County, CA802D+19.7
- Sutter County, CA611R+31.4
- Placer County, CA258R+8.5
- Butte County, CA135R+3.1
- Yolo County, CA73D+36.2
- Nevada County, CA72D+12.2
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Sutter County, CA559
- Sacramento County, CA362
- Placer County, CA255
- Butte County, CA150
- Nevada County, CA73
- Yolo County, CA44
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −604 |
| 2012 | −546 |
| 2013 | −440 |
| 2014 | −260 |
| 2015 | −217 |
| 2016 | +247 |
| 2017 | +1,084 |
| 2018 | +523 |
| 2019 | +542 |
| 2021 | +699 |
| 2022 | +625 |
| 2023 | +724 |
| 2024 | +1,118 |
| 2025 | +856 |
Yuba County, anchored by Marysville along the Feather River, has shifted steadily rightward over the past decade, delivering double-digit Republican presidential margins even as California's overall tilt deepens in the opposite direction.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 50.2 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 46.2 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.2 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 25.8 points.
A population of 84,507, a 49% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $76,373 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Sutter County and Kern County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Yuba County, California. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/06115/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.