Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the city’s overall result across 2004–2024, on current city boundaries.
President results by year
Vote totals, margins, and source status
HarrisDemocratic19.6%297TrumpRepublican78.2%1,184OtherAll other candidates2.2%33
R+58.6
Lead
887
Total
1,514
vs nation
R+57.1
BidenDemocratic19.4%303TrumpRepublican78.1%1,217OtherAll other candidates2.5%39
R+58.6
Lead
914
Total
1,559
vs nation
R+63.1
ClintonDemocratic17.2%215TrumpRepublican62.6%780OtherAll other candidates20.2%252
R+45.3
Lead
528
Total
1,247
vs nation
R+47.4
ObamaDemocratic15.3%175RomneyRepublican83.1%951OtherAll other candidates1.7%19
R+67.8
Lead
776
Total
1,145
vs nation
R+71.6
ObamaDemocratic26.9%300McCainRepublican67.5%753OtherAll other candidates5.6%62
R+40.6
Lead
453
Total
1,115
vs nation
R+47.9
KerryDemocratic18.8%195BushRepublican75.7%784OtherAll other candidates5.4%56
R+56.9
Lead
589
Total
1,035
vs nation
R+54.5
Key facts
2024 presidential margin
R+58.6MIT Election Lab
Population
3,8052024 5-year
Population density
1,312 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
Land area
2.9 sq miTIGER/Line
Median household income
$68,9202024 5-year
White (non-Hispanic)
88.9%2024 5-year
Black
1.3%2024 5-year
Hispanic / Latino
4.1%2024 5-year
Peak Republican margin
R+67.8 in 2012MIT Election Lab
Participation
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
2024 turnout
58.6%1,538 participants ÷ 2,625 CVAP
2020→2022 drop-off
+20.7 ptsPresidential-dependent
Drop-off vs state
-4.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
Mechanical 2026
37.9%–45.4%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
0%20%40%60%80%
49.9%
50.0%
20042008201220162018202020222024
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
Cycle
Participants
CVAP
Turnout
Series
Quality
1,538
2,625 ± 223
58.6%
Audited
E/A
2022Mid
1,242
2,483 ± 200
50.0%
Audited
E/A
1,631
2,306 ± 190
70.7%
Audited
E/A
2018Mid
1,148
2,302 ± 179
49.9%
Audited
E/A
1,254
2,254 ± 158
55.6%
Audited
E/A
1,145
1,955
58.6%
Derived
—
1,115
1,592
70.0%
Derived
—
1,035
1,229 extrapolated
84.2%
Derived
—
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
2024: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 323/229.
2022: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 322/184.
2020: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 321/4.
2018: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 320/139.
2016: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 319/133.
2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
presidential history
Party record book
Mount Pleasant, UT · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
2004–2024 · 6 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
26.9%
300 votes · R+40.6
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · 19.6%
Republican
Mitt Romney2012
83.1%
951 votes · R+67.8
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 78.2%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Joe Biden2020
303votes
19.4% of the vote · R+58.6
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 300 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2020
1,217votes
78.1% of the vote · R+58.6
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 1,184 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Hillary Clinton2016
−47.4pts D vs U.S.
Place R+45.3 · U.S. D+2.1
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · −47.9 pts
Republican
Mitt Romney2012
+71.6pts R vs U.S.
Place R+67.8 · U.S. D+3.9
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · +63.1 pts
U.S. House elections · 2 House
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Mount Pleasant · which candidate this place backed in each party’s presidential nominating contest, cycle by cycle. A primary is a contest inside one party, so it has no Democratic–Republican margin and is not part of the general-election record above.
Akashic reports votes cast, not delegates awarded. The two can disagree: Clinton led the 2008 national primary popular vote by less than half a point and did not win the nomination.
Primary returns are published at county grain. The figures below are Sanpete County, Utah, the county containing Mount Pleasant — Mount Pleasant’s own primary vote sits inside those totals and is not separately reported.
Presidential nominating contests in Mount Pleasant, by party and cycle.
○no contest record — Akashic holds no result for that party and cycle here. It is not a claim that no contest was held. Telling apart a contest that was cancelled, one that went uncontested, and one simply not yet ingested needs a nominating-contest calendar, which is a separate ingest from results and does not exist yet.
Republican presidential primaries are not yet ingested — the Republican series runs from 1856 and is in scope. The row is kept so its absence is visible: a Democratic-only panel would otherwise read as though no one else held a contest.
Akashic carries 10 states for 2012 and 3 states for 2024. Cycles in which an incumbent president seeks renomination are thin by nature — few states run a contested primary — so a sparse column is politics, not a hole in the record.
County returns carry a leader and a lead over the runner-up, and nothing more. The full candidate field with vote shares is published at state grain — follow a cycle above to the state contest for it.
Mount Pleasant sits in Utah's Sanpete Valley, where a predominantly LDS, agricultural population has historically produced lopsided Republican margins in statewide and federal contests.
Across the recorded series it reached a Republican high of 67.8 points in 2012. The 2024 margin was 58.6 points.
A population of 3,805, a 89% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $68,920 describe the city.
In 2024, Mount Pleasant, Utah voted Republican by 58.6 points (R+58.6), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 1,514 votes cast, 297 went Democratic and 1,184 went Republican.
How many people live in Mount Pleasant, Utah?
Mount Pleasant, Utah has a population of 3,805 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Mount Pleasant, Utah?
Median household income in Mount Pleasant, Utah is $68,920 — below the national median of $80,734. The Utah state median is $95,166.
What is the political history of Mount Pleasant, Utah?
Akashic tracks 6 presidential elections in Mount Pleasant, Utah from 2004 to 2024. Of those, 0 went Democratic and 6 went Republican.
