Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the city’s overall result across 2004–2024, on current city boundaries.
President results by year
Vote totals, margins, and source status
HarrisDemocratic34.6%567TrumpRepublican60.9%997OtherAll other candidates4.5%74
R+26.3
Lead
430
Total
1,638
vs nation
R+24.8
BidenDemocratic34.4%563TrumpRepublican62.1%1,017OtherAll other candidates3.5%57
R+27.7
Lead
454
Total
1,637
vs nation
R+32.2
ClintonDemocratic29.6%364TrumpRepublican61.4%754OtherAll other candidates9.0%111
R+31.7
Lead
390
Total
1,229
vs nation
R+33.8
ObamaDemocratic42.4%467RomneyRepublican54.2%597OtherAll other candidates3.4%38
R+11.8
Lead
130
Total
1,102
vs nation
R+15.7
ObamaDemocratic44.0%488McCainRepublican53.0%587OtherAll other candidates3.0%33
R+8.9
Lead
99
Total
1,108
vs nation
R+16.2
KerryDemocratic39.5%398BushRepublican57.9%584OtherAll other candidates2.6%26
R+18.5
Lead
186
Total
1,008
vs nation
R+16.0
Key facts
2024 presidential margin
R+26.3MIT Election Lab
Population
3,2872024 5-year
Population density
802 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
Land area
4.1 sq miTIGER/Line
Median household income
$72,4262024 5-year
White (non-Hispanic)
61.8%2024 5-year
Black
0.6%2024 5-year
Hispanic / Latino
30.5%2024 5-year
Peak Republican margin
R+31.7 in 2016MIT Election Lab
Participation
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
2024 turnout
83.9%1,655 participants ÷ 1,973 CVAP
2020→2022 drop-off
+8.6 ptsHigh-turnout, durable
Drop-off vs state
-12.5 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
Mechanical 2026
75.3%–75.5%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
0%20%40%60%80%100%
58.0%
59.0%
20042008201220162018202020222024
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
Cycle
Participants
CVAP
Turnout
Series
Quality
1,655
1,973 ± 380
83.9%
Audited
E/D
2022Mid
1,230
2,084 ± 437
59.0%
Audited
E/D
1,648
2,437 ± 381
67.6%
Audited
E/D
2018Mid
1,201
2,072 ± 344
58.0%
Audited
E/D
1,290
1,950 ± 323
66.2%
Audited
E/D
1,102
1,800
61.2%
Derived
—
1,108
1,506
73.6%
Derived
—
1,008
1,212 extrapolated
83.2%
Derived
—
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
2024: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 323/229.
2022: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 322/184.
2020: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 321/4.
2018: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 320/139.
2016: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 319/133.
2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
presidential history
Party record book
Grand Mound, WA · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
2004–2024 · 6 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
44.0%
488 votes · R+8.9
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2012 · 42.4%
Republican
Donald Trump2020
62.1%
1,017 votes · R+27.7
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2016 · 61.4%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Kamala Harris2024
567votes
34.6% of the vote · R+26.3
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · 563 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2020
1,017votes
62.1% of the vote · R+27.7
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 997 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Barack Obama2012
−15.7pts D vs U.S.
Place R+11.8 · U.S. D+3.9
Runner-up · John Kerry, 2004 · −16.0 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2016
+33.8pts R vs U.S.
Place R+31.7 · U.S. D+2.1
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · +32.2 pts
U.S. House elections · 2 House
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Grand Mound · which candidate this place backed in each party’s presidential nominating contest, cycle by cycle. A primary is a contest inside one party, so it has no Democratic–Republican margin and is not part of the general-election record above.
Akashic reports votes cast, not delegates awarded. The two can disagree: Clinton led the 2008 national primary popular vote by less than half a point and did not win the nomination.
Primary returns are published at county grain. The figures below are Thurston County, Washington, the county containing Grand Mound — Grand Mound’s own primary vote sits inside those totals and is not separately reported.
Presidential nominating contests in Grand Mound, by party and cycle.
○no contest record — Akashic holds no result for that party and cycle here. It is not a claim that no contest was held. Telling apart a contest that was cancelled, one that went uncontested, and one simply not yet ingested needs a nominating-contest calendar, which is a separate ingest from results and does not exist yet.
Republican presidential primaries are not yet ingested — the Republican series runs from 1856 and is in scope. The row is kept so its absence is visible: a Democratic-only panel would otherwise read as though no one else held a contest.
Akashic carries 10 states for 2012 and 3 states for 2024. Cycles in which an incumbent president seeks renomination are thin by nature — few states run a contested primary — so a sparse column is politics, not a hole in the record.
County returns carry a leader and a lead over the runner-up, and nothing more. The full candidate field with vote shares is published at state grain — follow a cycle above to the state contest for it.
Grand Mound sits near the I-5 corridor in Thurston County, a county that has trended competitive in statewide races as suburban expansion presses into historically rural precincts around its edges.
Across the recorded series it reached a Republican high of 31.7 points in 2016. Between 2020 and 2024 the city moved 1.5 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 26.3 points.
A population of 3,287, a 62% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $72,426 describe the city.
In 2024, Grand Mound, Washington voted Republican by 26.3 points (R+26.3), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 1,638 votes cast, 567 went Democratic and 997 went Republican.
How many people live in Grand Mound, Washington?
Grand Mound, Washington has a population of 3,287 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Grand Mound, Washington?
Median household income in Grand Mound, Washington is $72,426 — below the national median of $80,734. The Washington state median is $98,141.
What is the political history of Grand Mound, Washington?
Akashic tracks 6 presidential elections in Grand Mound, Washington from 2004 to 2024. Of those, 0 went Democratic and 6 went Republican.
