Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
2024 turnout
48.9%5,607 participants ÷ 11,477 CVAP
2020→2022 drop-off
+9.7 ptsVolatile
Drop-off vs state
-12.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
Mechanical 2026
36.2%–39.2%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
0%20%40%60%80%
43.1%
46.2%
20042008201220162018202020222024
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
Cycle
Participants
CVAP
Turnout
Series
Quality
5,607
11,477 ± 511
48.9%
Audited
E/A
2022Mid
5,228
11,325 ± 489
46.2%
Audited
E/A
6,779
12,145 ± 597
55.8%
Audited
E/A
2018Mid
5,187
12,022 ± 473
43.1%
Audited
E/A
7,057
11,985 ± 400
58.9%
Audited
E/A
8,070
11,502
70.2%
Derived
—
8,371
16,227
51.6%
Derived
—
7,275
20,952 extrapolated
34.7%
Derived
—
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
2024: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 323/229.
2022: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 322/184.
2020: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 321/4.
2018: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 320/139.
2016: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 319/133.
2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
presidential history
Party record book
Opelousas, LA · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
2004–2024 · 6 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2012
76.1%
6,138 votes · D+53.3
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · 75.3%
Republican
John McCain2008
25.9%
2,170 votes · D+46.8
Runner-up · George W. Bush, 2004 · 25.3%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2012
6,138votes
76.1% of the vote · D+53.3
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 6,088 votes
Republican
John McCain2008
2,170votes
25.9% of the vote · D+46.8
Runner-up · George W. Bush, 2004 · 1,841 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
John Kerry2004
+51.7pts D vs U.S.
Place D+49.3 · U.S. R+2.5
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · +51.1 pts
Republican
John McCain2008
−39.5pts R vs U.S.
Place D+46.8 · U.S. D+7.3
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · −48.9 pts
presidential primaries
Nominating contests
Opelousas · which candidate this place backed in each party’s presidential nominating contest, cycle by cycle. A primary is a contest inside one party, so it has no Democratic–Republican margin and is not part of the general-election record above.
Akashic reports votes cast, not delegates awarded. The two can disagree: Clinton led the 2008 national primary popular vote by less than half a point and did not win the nomination.
Primary returns are published at county grain. The figures below are St. Landry Parish, Louisiana, the county containing Opelousas — Opelousas’s own primary vote sits inside those totals and is not separately reported.
Presidential nominating contests in Opelousas, by party and cycle.
○no contest record — Akashic holds no result for that party and cycle here. It is not a claim that no contest was held. Telling apart a contest that was cancelled, one that went uncontested, and one simply not yet ingested needs a nominating-contest calendar, which is a separate ingest from results and does not exist yet.
Republican presidential primaries are not yet ingested — the Republican series runs from 1856 and is in scope. The row is kept so its absence is visible: a Democratic-only panel would otherwise read as though no one else held a contest.
Akashic carries 10 states for 2012 and 3 states for 2024. Cycles in which an incumbent president seeks renomination are thin by nature — few states run a contested primary — so a sparse column is politics, not a hole in the record.
County returns carry a leader and a lead over the runner-up, and nothing more. The full candidate field with vote shares is published at state grain — follow a cycle above to the state contest for it.
Opelousas anchors St. Landry Parish as one of Louisiana's older Creole and African American cultural centers; its electorate skews heavily Democratic in federal races while local offices regularly draw competitive, personality-driven contests.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 53.4 points in 2020. Between 2020 and 2024 the city moved 3.8 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 49.6 points.
A population of 15,495, a 16% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $32,964 describe the city. The city's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Forrest City and Yazoo City.
Akashic
Political twins — cities
The cities whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
In 2024, Opelousas, Louisiana voted Democratic by 49.6 points (D+49.6), carried by the Democratic candidate. Out of 5,558 votes cast, 4,106 went Democratic and 1,349 went Republican.
How many people live in Opelousas, Louisiana?
Opelousas, Louisiana has a population of 15,495 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Opelousas, Louisiana?
Median household income in Opelousas, Louisiana is $32,964 — below the national median of $80,734. The Louisiana state median is $60,756.
What is the political history of Opelousas, Louisiana?
Akashic tracks 6 presidential elections in Opelousas, Louisiana from 2004 to 2024. Of those, 6 went Democratic and 0 went Republican.
