Yuma-El Centro, California
Akashic| Donald Trump ✓Republican | 55.1% | 67,291 |
|---|---|---|
| Kamala HarrisDemocratic | 43.3% | 52,906 |
| Robert F. Kennedy Jr.American Independent | 1.7% | 2,023 |
County-level results (2 counties) — table
| County | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|
| Imperial County, CA | Republican | R+0.9 |
| Yuma County, AZ | Republican | R+20.4 |
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Other | Margin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 43.3%Harris52,906 | 55.1%Trump67,291 | 1.7%Kennedy2,023 | 122,220 | ||
| D | 52.7%Biden66,888 | 45.2%Trump57,381 | 2.0%Jorgensen2,546 | 126,815 | ||
| D | 56.6%Clinton57,272 | 37.5%Trump37,869 | 5.9%Johnson5,960 | 101,101 | ||
| D | 53.6%Obama43,195 | 44.8%Romney36,129 | 1.6%Johnson1,314 | 80,638 | ||
| D | 51.8%Obama42,721 | 46.8%McCain38,585 | 1.4%Nader1,129 | 82,435 | ||
| R | 46.7%Kerry33,996 | 52.3%Bush38,074 | 1.0%Badnarik733 | 72,803 | ||
| R | 47.8%Gore27,544 | 49.0%Bush28,232 | 3.1%Nader1,813 | 57,589 | ||
| D | 49.7%Clinton26,858 | 42.0%Dole22,718 | 8.3%Perot4,495 | 54,071 | ||
| D | 40.2%Clinton21,476 | 40.1%Bush21,411 | 19.6%Perot10,476 | 53,363 | ||
| R | 41.9%Dukakis19,195 | 57.0%Bush26,142 | 1.1%Paul508 | 45,845 | ||
| R | 34.3%Mondale14,695 | 64.7%Reagan27,677 | 1.0%Bergland410 | 42,782 | ||
| R | 32.7%Carter13,975 | 59.6%Reagan25,461 | 7.7%Anderson3,288 | 42,724 | ||
| R | 46.6%Carter18,242 | 50.9%Ford19,942 | 2.4%Macbride958 | 39,142 | ||
| R | 33.6%McGovern12,737 | 62.6%Nixon23,774 | 3.8%Schmitz1,444 | 37,955 | ||
| R | 37.8%Humphrey13,251 | 50.4%Nixon17,674 | 11.8%Wallace4,154 | 35,079 | ||
| D | 52.9%Johnson19,000 | 47.0%Goldwater16,878 | 0.1%Hass24 | 35,902 | ||
| R | 49.2%Kennedy15,761 | 50.5%Nixon16,153 | 0.3%Byrd96 | 32,010 | ||
| R | 46.7%Stevenson13,973 | 53.0%Eisenhower15,856 | 0.2%Andrews65 | 29,894 | ||
| R | 41.3%Stevenson10,777 | 58.3%Eisenhower15,223 | 0.4%Hallinan108 | 26,108 | ||
| D | 52.1%Truman9,784 | 45.5%Dewey8,541 | 2.4%Thurmond449 | 18,774 | ||
| D | 52.1%Roosevelt8,557 | 47.5%Dewey7,810 | 0.4%Thomas58 | 16,425 | ||
| D | 57.2%Roosevelt11,866 | 42.1%Willkie8,724 | 0.7%Thomas153 | 20,743 | ||
| D | 64.5%Roosevelt10,988 | 33.7%Landon5,747 | 1.8%Lemke308 | 17,043 | ||
| D | 68.5%Roosevelt12,235 | 27.7%Hoover4,945 | 3.9%Thomas689 | 17,869 | ||
| R | 34.2%Smith4,075 | 64.9%Hoover7,745 | 0.9%Thomas109 | 11,929 | ||
| R | 16.2%Davis1,610 | 47.6%Coolidge4,735 | 36.2%La Follette3,593 | 9,938 | ||
| R | 31.8%Cox3,199 | 62.6%Harding6,305 | 5.6%Debs563 | 10,067 | ||
| D | 51.6%Wilson4,595 | 38.4%Hughes3,421 | 9.9%Benson883 | 8,899 | ||
| O | 38.8%Wilson1,719 | 2.0%Taft90 | 59.2%Roosevelt2,625 | 4,434 | ||
| R | 35.4%Bryan675 | 47.6%Taft909 | 17.0%Debs324 | 1,908 | ||
| — | — | — | — | — | ||
| — | — | — | — | — | ||
| — | — | — | — | — | ||
| — | — | — | — | — |
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1908 | −12.3% |
| 1912 | +36.7% |
| 1916 | +13.2% |
| 1920 | −30.9% |
| 1924 | −31.4% |
| 1928 | −30.8% |
| 1932 | +40.8% |
| 1936 | +30.8% |
| 1940 | +15.1% |
| 1944 | +4.5% |
| 1948 | +6.6% |
| 1952 | −17.0% |
| 1956 | −6.3% |
| 1960 | −1.2% |
| 1964 | +5.9% |
| 1968 | −12.6% |
| 1972 | −29.1% |
| 1976 | −4.3% |
| 1980 | −26.9% |
| 1984 | −30.3% |
| 1988 | −15.2% |
| 1992 | +0.1% |
| 1996 | +7.7% |
| 2000 | −1.2% |
| 2004 | −5.6% |
| 2008 | +5.0% |
| 2012 | +8.8% |
| 2016 | +19.2% |
| 2020 | +7.5% |
| 2024 | −11.8% |
Spanning the Colorado River desert from southwestern Arizona into California's Imperial Valley, this market's electorate is shaped by Latino majorities, year-round farm labor, and one of the nation's busiest land-border crossing corridors.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 40.8 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 31.4 points in 1924. Between 2020 and 2024 the market moved 19.3 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 11.8 points.
A population of 391,943, a 20% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $60,488 describe the market. The market's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Corpus Christi and El Paso (Las Cruces).
The media markets whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Yuma-El Centro, California. Akashic. https://akashic.app/dma/771/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.