Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the city’s overall result across 2004–2024, on current city boundaries.
President results by year
Vote totals, margins, and source status
HarrisDemocratic20.8%207TrumpRepublican77.8%774OtherAll other candidates1.4%14
R+57.0
Lead
567
Total
995
vs nation
R+55.5
BidenDemocratic23.2%235TrumpRepublican75.6%765OtherAll other candidates1.2%12
R+52.4
Lead
530
Total
1,012
vs nation
R+56.8
ClintonDemocratic23.2%223TrumpRepublican72.9%700OtherAll other candidates3.9%37
R+49.7
Lead
477
Total
960
vs nation
R+51.8
ObamaDemocratic32.6%306RomneyRepublican66.2%622OtherAll other candidates1.3%12
R+33.6
Lead
316
Total
940
vs nation
R+37.5
ObamaDemocratic32.5%343McCainRepublican65.5%691OtherAll other candidates2.0%21
R+33.0
Lead
348
Total
1,055
vs nation
R+40.3
KerryDemocratic29.5%244BushRepublican70.0%579OtherAll other candidates0.5%4
R+40.5
Lead
335
Total
827
vs nation
R+38.1
Key facts
2024 presidential margin
R+57.0MIT Election Lab
Population
2,5212024 5-year
Population density
1,401 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
Land area
1.8 sq miTIGER/Line
Median household income
$55,4172024 5-year
White (non-Hispanic)
78.2%2024 5-year
Black
17.5%2024 5-year
Hispanic / Latino
0.7%2024 5-year
Peak Republican margin
R+57.0 in 2024MIT Election Lab
Participation
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
2024 turnout
58.3%1,004 participants ÷ 1,721 CVAP
2020→2022 drop-off
+22.3 ptsPresidential-dependent
Drop-off vs state
+0.8 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
Mechanical 2026
36.0%–44.1%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
0%20%40%60%80%
61.0%
39.8%
20042008201220162018202020222024
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
Cycle
Participants
CVAP
Turnout
Series
Quality
1,004
1,721 ± 366
58.3%
Audited
E/D
2022Mid
694
1,744 ± 314
39.8%
Audited
E/D
1,019
1,640 ± 284
62.1%
Audited
E/D
2018Mid
794
1,301 ± 174
61.0%
Audited
E/D
978
1,454 ± 185
67.3%
Audited
E/D
940
1,545
60.8%
Derived
—
1,055
1,417
74.5%
Derived
—
827
1,289 extrapolated
64.2%
Derived
—
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
2024: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 323/229.
2022: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 322/184.
2020: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 321/4.
2018: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 320/139.
2016: numerator source 160, denominator source 157; estimated total ballots; preferred-county:block-reference-presidential-or-cvap-weight:v2; allocation share 100.0%; series 319/133.
2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
presidential history
Party record book
Ninety Six, SC · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
2004–2024 · 6 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2012
32.6%
306 votes · R+33.6
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 32.5%
Republican
Donald Trump2024
77.8%
774 votes · R+57.0
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 75.6%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
343votes
32.5% of the vote · R+33.0
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2012 · 306 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
774votes
77.8% of the vote · R+57.0
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 765 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Barack Obama2012
−37.5pts D vs U.S.
Place R+33.6 · U.S. D+3.9
Runner-up · John Kerry, 2004 · −38.1 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+56.8pts R vs U.S.
Place R+52.4 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · +55.5 pts
U.S. House elections · 1 House
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Ninety Six · which candidate this place backed in each party’s presidential nominating contest, cycle by cycle. A primary is a contest inside one party, so it has no Democratic–Republican margin and is not part of the general-election record above.
Akashic reports votes cast, not delegates awarded. The two can disagree: Clinton led the 2008 national primary popular vote by less than half a point and did not win the nomination.
Primary returns are published at county grain. The figures below are Greenwood County, South Carolina, the county containing Ninety Six — Ninety Six’s own primary vote sits inside those totals and is not separately reported.
Presidential nominating contests in Ninety Six, by party and cycle.
○no contest record — Akashic holds no result for that party and cycle here. It is not a claim that no contest was held. Telling apart a contest that was cancelled, one that went uncontested, and one simply not yet ingested needs a nominating-contest calendar, which is a separate ingest from results and does not exist yet.
Republican presidential primaries are not yet ingested — the Republican series runs from 1856 and is in scope. The row is kept so its absence is visible: a Democratic-only panel would otherwise read as though no one else held a contest.
Akashic carries 10 states for 2012 and 3 states for 2024. Cycles in which an incumbent president seeks renomination are thin by nature — few states run a contested primary — so a sparse column is politics, not a hole in the record.
County returns carry a leader and a lead over the runner-up, and nothing more. The full candidate field with vote shares is published at state grain — follow a cycle above to the state contest for it.
Ninety Six sits in Greenwood County, where Republican candidates have carried presidential contests by double-digit margins in recent cycles. Its tiny electorate makes precinct-level swings statistically volatile but directionally consistent with the surrounding rural Piedmont.
Across the recorded series it reached a Republican high of 57.0 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the city moved 4.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 57.0 points.
A population of 2,521, a 78% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $55,417 describe the city.
In 2024, Ninety Six, South Carolina voted Republican by 57.0 points (R+57.0), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 995 votes cast, 207 went Democratic and 774 went Republican.
How many people live in Ninety Six, South Carolina?
Ninety Six, South Carolina has a population of 2,521 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Ninety Six, South Carolina?
Median household income in Ninety Six, South Carolina is $55,417 — below the national median of $80,734. The South Carolina state median is $69,324.
What is the political history of Ninety Six, South Carolina?
Akashic tracks 6 presidential elections in Ninety Six, South Carolina from 2004 to 2024. Of those, 0 went Democratic and 6 went Republican.
