Show Low, AZ, Arizona
Akashic| Donald Trump ✓Republican | 58.1% | 29,480 |
|---|---|---|
| Kamala HarrisDemocratic | 40.9% | 20,754 |
| Jill SteinGreen | 0.9% | 472 |
County-level results (1 county) — table
| County | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|
| Navajo County, AZ | Republican | R+17.2 |
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Other | Margin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 40.9%Harris20,754 | 58.1%Trump29,480 | 0.9%Stein472 | 50,706 | ||
| R | 45.0%Biden23,383 | 53.3%Trump27,657 | 1.7%Jorgensen890 | 51,930 | ||
| R | 40.8%Clinton16,459 | 51.1%Trump20,577 | 8.1%Johnson3,258 | 40,294 | ||
| R | 45.2%Obama16,945 | 53.1%Romney19,884 | 1.7%Johnson636 | 37,465 | ||
| R | 43.5%Obama15,579 | 55.2%McCain19,761 | 1.3%Barr460 | 35,800 | ||
| R | 45.7%Kerry14,815 | 53.3%Bush17,277 | 1.0%Badnarik312 | 32,404 | ||
| R | 46.9%Gore11,794 | 49.3%Bush12,386 | 3.8%Nader967 | 25,147 | ||
| D | 51.8%Clinton12,912 | 37.1%Dole9,262 | 11.1%Perot2,764 | 24,938 | ||
| D | 44.2%Clinton10,882 | 32.4%Bush7,994 | 23.4%Perot5,762 | 24,638 | ||
| R | 45.9%Dukakis9,023 | 52.8%Bush10,393 | 1.3%Paul261 | 19,677 | ||
| R | 40.9%Mondale8,017 | 58.1%Reagan11,379 | 0.9%Bergland182 | 19,578 | ||
| R | 30.3%Carter5,110 | 63.9%Reagan10,790 | 5.8%Anderson982 | 16,882 | ||
| D | 50.3%Carter7,323 | 46.7%Ford6,796 | 3.0%McCarthy441 | 14,560 | ||
| R | 34.6%McGovern4,003 | 60.5%Nixon6,999 | 4.9%Schmitz570 | 11,572 | ||
| R | 32.5%Humphrey2,930 | 51.0%Nixon4,596 | 16.5%Wallace1,486 | 9,012 | ||
| R | 49.4%Johnson4,770 | 50.5%Goldwater4,870 | 0.1%Hass9 | 9,649 | ||
| R | 42.7%Kennedy3,052 | 57.2%Nixon4,090 | 0.1%Byrd9 | 7,151 | ||
| R | 34.1%Stevenson2,033 | 65.8%Eisenhower3,928 | 0.2%Andrews9 | 5,970 | ||
| R | 42.7%Stevenson2,593 | 57.3%Eisenhower3,478 | 0.0% | 6,071 | ||
| D | 58.5%Truman2,669 | 40.3%Dewey1,841 | 1.2%Thurmond56 | 4,566 | ||
| D | 62.6%Roosevelt2,660 | 37.1%Dewey1,579 | 0.3%Thomas13 | 4,252 | ||
| D | 66.4%Roosevelt3,052 | 33.3%Willkie1,533 | 0.3%Thomas12 | 4,597 | ||
| D | 73.3%Roosevelt3,037 | 25.4%Landon1,052 | 1.3%Lemke53 | 4,142 | ||
| D | 62.8%Roosevelt2,602 | 30.1%Hoover1,248 | 7.1%Thomas296 | 4,146 | ||
| R | 45.0%Smith1,316 | 55.0%Hoover1,608 | 0.0% | 2,924 | ||
| R | 27.7%Davis684 | 42.9%Coolidge1,060 | 29.4%La Follette727 | 2,471 | ||
| R | 48.9%Cox1,031 | 51.1%Harding1,078 | 0.0% | 2,109 | ||
| D | 65.9%Wilson1,240 | 30.5%Hughes574 | 3.6%Benson67 | 1,881 | ||
| D | 39.0%Wilson287 | 22.9%Taft168 | 38.1%Roosevelt280 | 735 | ||
| — | — | — | — | — | ||
| — | — | — | — | — | ||
| — | — | — | — | — | ||
| — | — | — | — | — | ||
| — | — | — | — | — |
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1912 | +16.2% |
| 1916 | +35.4% |
| 1920 | −2.2% |
| 1924 | −15.2% |
| 1928 | −10.0% |
| 1932 | +32.7% |
| 1936 | +47.9% |
| 1940 | +33.0% |
| 1944 | +25.4% |
| 1948 | +18.1% |
| 1952 | −14.6% |
| 1956 | −31.7% |
| 1960 | −14.5% |
| 1964 | −1.0% |
| 1968 | −18.5% |
| 1972 | −25.9% |
| 1976 | +3.6% |
| 1980 | −33.6% |
| 1984 | −17.2% |
| 1988 | −7.0% |
| 1992 | +11.7% |
| 1996 | +14.6% |
| 2000 | −2.4% |
| 2004 | −7.6% |
| 2008 | −11.7% |
| 2012 | −7.8% |
| 2016 | −10.2% |
| 2020 | −8.2% |
| 2024 | −17.2% |
Show Low anchors a high-elevation ponderosa-pine corridor where a small but growing retiree and tourism economy shapes a consistently Republican-leaning electorate across both counties it straddles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 47.9 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 33.6 points in 1980. Between 2020 and 2024 the metro moved 9.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 17.2 points.
A population of 108,415, a 43% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $54,606 describe the metro. The metro's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Tahlequah, OK and Laurinburg, NC.
The metros whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Show Low, AZ, Arizona. Akashic. https://akashic.app/cbsa/43320/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.