435 contests
Use the us house results table as the launch point for place dossiers, benchmark comparison, and layered explorer analysis.
US House · 2002
Chamber Control
| District ▲ | Winner | W% | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | ThompsonDEM | 64.1% | ||
| ▶ | HergerREP | 65.8% | ||
| ▶ | OseREP | 62.5% | ||
| ▶ | DoolittleREP | 64.8% | ||
| ▶ | MatsuiDEM | 70.5% | ||
| ▶ | WoolseyDEM | 66.7% | ||
| ▶ | MillerDEM | 70.7% | ||
| ▶ | PelosiDEM | 79.6% | ||
| ▶ | LeeDEM | 81.4% | ||
| ▶ | TauscherDEM | 75.6% | ||
| ▶ | PomboREP | 60.3% | ||
| ▶ | LantosDEM | 68.1% | ||
| ▶ | StarkDEM | 71.1% | ||
| ▶ | EshooDEM | 68.2% | ||
| ▶ | HondaDEM | 65.8% | ||
| ▶ | LofgrenDEM | 67.0% | ||
| ▶ | FarrDEM | 68.1% | ||
| ▶ | CardozaDEM | 51.3% | ||
| ▶ | RadanovichREP | 67.3% | ||
| ▶ | DooleyDEM | 63.7% | ||
| ▶ | NunesREP | 70.5% | ||
| ▶ | ThomasREP | 73.3% | ||
| ▶ | CappsDEM | 59.0% | ||
| ▶ | GalleglyREP | 65.2% | ||
| ▶ | McKeonREP | 65.0% | ||
| ▶ | DreierREP | 63.8% | ||
| ▶ | ShermanDEM | 62.0% | ||
| ▶ | BermanDEM | 71.4% | ||
| ▶ | SchiffDEM | 62.6% | ||
| ▶ | WaxmanDEM | 70.4% | ||
| ▶ | BecerraDEM | 81.2% | ||
| ▶ | SolisDEM | 68.8% | ||
| ▶ | WatsonDEM | 82.5% | ||
| ▶ | 74.0% | |||
| ▶ | WatersDEM | 77.5% | ||
| ▶ | HarmanDEM | 61.4% | ||
| ▶ | 72.9% | |||
| ▶ | NapolitanoDEM | 71.1% | ||
| ▶ | SanchezDEM | 54.8% | ||
| ▶ | RoyceREP | 67.6% | ||
| ▶ | LewisREP | 67.4% | ||
| ▶ | MillerREP | 67.8% | ||
| ▶ | BacaDEM | 66.4% | ||
| ▶ | CalvertREP | 63.7% | ||
| ▶ | BonoREP | 65.2% | ||
| ▶ | RohrabacherREP | 61.7% | ||
| ▶ | SanchezDEM | 60.6% | ||
| ▶ | CoxREP | 68.4% | ||
| ▶ | IssaREP | 77.2% | ||
| ▶ | CunninghamREP | 64.3% | ||
| ▶ | FilnerDEM | 57.9% | ||
| ▶ | HunterREP | 70.2% | ||
| ▶ | DavisDEM | 62.2% |
| District ▲ | Winner | W% | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | MillerREP | 74.6% | ||
| ▶ | BoydDEM | 66.9% | ||
| ▶ | BrownDEM | 59.3% | ||
| ▶ | CrenshawREP | 99.7% | ||
| ▶ | Brown-WaiteREP | 47.9% | ||
| ▶ | StearnsREP | 65.4% | ||
| ▶ | MicaREP | 59.6% | ||
| ▶ | KellerREP | 65.1% | ||
| ▶ | BilirakisREP | 71.5% | ||
| ▶ | YoungREP | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | DavisDEM | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | PutnamREP | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | HarrisREP | 54.8% | ||
| ▶ | GossREP | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | WeldonREP | 63.1% | ||
| ▶ | FoleyREP | 78.9% | ||
| ▶ | MeekDEM | 99.9% | ||
| ▶ | Ros-LehtinenREP | 69.1% | ||
| ▶ | WexlerDEM | 72.2% | ||
| ▶ | DeutschDEM | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | Diaz-BalartREP | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | ShawREP | 60.8% | ||
| ▶ | HastingsDEM | 77.5% | ||
| ▶ | FeeneyREP | 61.8% | ||
| ▶ | Diaz-BalartREP | 64.7% |
| District ▲ | Winner | W% | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | AbercrombieDEM | 72.8% | ||
| ▶ | MinkDEM | 56.2% |
| District ▲ | Winner | W% | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | RushDEM | 81.2% | ||
| ▶ | JacksonDEM | 82.3% | ||
| ▶ | LipinskiDEM | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | GutierrezDEM | 79.7% | ||
| ▶ | EmanuelDEM | 66.8% | ||
| ▶ | HydeREP | 65.1% | ||
| ▶ | DavisDEM | 83.2% | ||
| ▶ | CraneREP | 57.4% | ||
| ▶ | SchakowskyDEM | 70.3% | ||
| ▶ | KirkREP | 68.8% | ||
| ▶ | WellerREP | 64.3% | ||
| ▶ | CostelloDEM | 69.3% | ||
| ▶ | BiggertREP | 70.3% | ||
| ▶ | HastertREP | 74.1% | ||
| ▶ | JohnsonREP | 65.2% | ||
| ▶ | ManzulloREP | 70.6% | ||
| ▶ | EvansDEM | 62.4% | ||
| ▶ | LahoodREP | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | ShimkusREP | 54.8% |
| District ▲ | Winner | W% | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | BishopDEM | 45.5% | ||
| ▶ | IsraelDEM | 47.3% | ||
| ▶ | KingREP | 53.0% | ||
| ▶ | McCarthyDEM | 47.4% | ||
| ▶ | AckermanDEM | 51.8% | ||
| ▶ | MeeksDEM | 61.5% | ||
| ▶ | CrowleyDEM | 47.0% | ||
| ▶ | NadlerDEM | 50.9% | ||
| ▶ | WeinerDEM | 47.6% | ||
| ▶ | TownsDEM | 61.5% | ||
| ▶ | OwensDEM | 57.0% | ||
| ▶ | VelazquezDEM | 51.7% | ||
| ▶ | FossellaREP | 50.6% | ||
| ▶ | MaloneyDEM | 56.1% | ||
| ▶ | RangelDEM | 60.5% | ||
| ▶ | SerranoDEM | 61.7% | ||
| ▶ | EngelDEM | 50.9% | ||
| ▶ | LoweyDEM | 50.2% | ||
| ▶ | KellyREP | 54.0% | ||
| ▶ | SweeneyREP | 56.3% | ||
| ▶ | McNultyDEM | 54.3% | ||
| ▶ | HincheyDEM | 48.0% | ||
| ▶ | McHughREP | 59.6% | ||
| ▶ | BoehlertREP | 53.3% | ||
| ▶ | WalshREP | 52.5% | ||
| ▶ | ReynoldsREP | 49.4% | ||
| ▶ | QuinnREP | 53.0% | ||
| ▶ | SlaughterDEM | 52.4% | ||
| ▶ | HoughtonREP | 55.9% |
| District ▲ | Winner | W% | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | BradyDEM | 86.4% | ||
| ▶ | FattahDEM | 87.8% | ||
| ▶ | EnglishREP | 77.7% | ||
| ▶ | HartREP | 64.5% | ||
| ▶ | PetersonREP | 87.2% | ||
| ▶ | GerlachREP | 51.4% | ||
| ▶ | WeldonREP | 66.1% | ||
| ▶ | GreenwoodREP | 62.6% | ||
| ▶ | ShusterREP | 71.0% | ||
| ▶ | SherwoodREP | 92.6% | ||
| ▶ | KanjorskiDEM | 55.6% | ||
| ▶ | MurthaDEM | 73.5% | ||
| ▶ | HoeffelDEM | 51.0% | ||
| ▶ | DoyleDEM | 99.9% | ||
| ▶ | ToomeyREP | 57.4% | ||
| ▶ | PittsREP | 88.5% | ||
| ▶ | HoldenDEM | 51.4% | ||
| ▶ | MurphyREP | 60.1% | ||
| ▶ | PlattsREP | 91.1% |
| District ▲ | Winner | W% | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | SandlinDEM | 56.5% | ||
| ▶ | TurnerDEM | 60.9% | ||
| ▶ | JohnsonREP | 74.0% | ||
| ▶ | HallDEM | 57.8% | ||
| ▶ | HensarlingREP | 58.2% | ||
| ▶ | BartonREP | 70.3% | ||
| ▶ | CulbersonREP | 89.2% | ||
| ▶ | BradyREP | 93.1% | ||
| ▶ | LampsonDEM | 58.6% | ||
| ▶ | DoggettDEM | 84.4% | ||
| ▶ | EdwardsDEM | 51.5% | ||
| ▶ | GrangerREP | 91.9% | ||
| ▶ | ThornberryREP | 79.3% | ||
| ▶ | PaulREP | 68.1% | ||
| ▶ | HinojosaDEM | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | ReyesDEM | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | StenholmDEM | 51.4% | ||
| ▶ | Jackson-LeeDEM | 76.9% | ||
| ▶ | CombestREP | 91.6% | ||
| ▶ | GonzalezDEM | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | SmithREP | 72.9% | ||
| ▶ | DelayREP | 63.2% | ||
| ▶ | BonillaREP | 51.5% | ||
| ▶ | FrostDEM | 64.7% | ||
| ▶ | BellDEM | 54.8% | ||
| ▶ | BurgessREP | 74.8% | ||
| ▶ | OrtizDEM | 61.1% | ||
| ▶ | RodriguezDEM | 71.1% | ||
| ▶ | GreenDEM | 95.2% | ||
| ▶ | JohnsonDEM | 74.3% | ||
| ▶ | CarterREP | 69.1% | ||
| ▶ | SessionsREP | 67.8% |