- Lead
- 3,721
- Total
- 17,712
- vs nation
- D+22.5
- Turnout
- 56.2%
Danville city, VA
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 56.2% of 31,809 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 4,282
- Total
- 19,389
- vs nation
- D+17.6
- Turnout
- 63.7%
- Lead
- 3,756
- Total
- 18,940
- vs nation
- D+17.7
- Turnout
- 59.3%
- Lead
- 4,455
- Total
- 20,204
- vs nation
- D+18.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,991
- Total
- 20,890
- vs nation
- D+11.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 37
- Total
- 19,112
- vs nation
- D+2.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,206
- Total
- 18,307
- vs nation
- R+7.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,086
- Total
- 18,519
- vs nation
- R+14.4
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- D+21.0MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 42,2142024 5-year
- Median household income
- $44,4232024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 38.8%2024 5-year
- Black
- 50.5%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 5.6%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+77.2 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+79.0 in 1972MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Hinds County, MS · twin score 95.9
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 56.2%17,888 participants ÷ 31,809 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +26.3 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off versus state
- +2.5 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 29.9%–37.4%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 19,218 | 32,383 | 59.3% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 15,241 | 31,729 | 48.0% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 19,683 | 30,892 | 63.7% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 12,052 | 32,213 | 37.4% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 17,888 | 31,809 | 56.2% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
32 precincts · 17,712 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -004 - WARD FOUR004 - WARD FOUR | 1,101 | 889 | 24 | 2,014 | 54.7% | 44.1% | D+10.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -016 - WARD SIXTEEN016 - WARD SIXTEEN | 672 | 930 | 15 | 1,617 | 41.6% | 57.5% | R+16.0 |
| Precinct -012 - WARD TWELVE012 - WARD TWELVE | 1,046 | 547 | 18 | 1,611 | 64.9% | 34.0% | D+31.0 |
| Precinct -011 - WARD ELEVEN011 - WARD ELEVEN | 1,061 | 477 | 16 | 1,554 | 68.3% | 30.7% | D+37.6 |
| Precinct -017 - WARD SEVENTEEN017 - WARD SEVENTEEN | 515 | 962 | 11 | 1,488 | 34.6% | 64.7% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -013 - WARD THIRTEEN013 - WARD THIRTEEN | 959 | 462 | 25 | 1,446 | 66.3% | 32.0% | D+34.4 |
| Precinct -015 - WARD FIFTEEN015 - WARD FIFTEEN | 723 | 661 | 15 | 1,399 | 51.7% | 47.2% | D+4.4 |
| Precinct -010 - WARD TEN010 - WARD TEN | 705 | 450 | 17 | 1,172 | 60.2% | 38.4% | D+21.8 |
| Precinct -003 - WARD THREE003 - WARD THREE | 717 | 273 | 19 | 1,009 | 71.1% | 27.1% | D+44.0 |
| Precinct -007 - WARD SEVEN007 - WARD SEVEN | 716 | 161 | 9 | 886 | 80.8% | 18.2% | D+62.6 |
| Precinct -008 - WARD EIGHT008 - WARD EIGHT | 587 | 266 | 9 | 862 | 68.1% | 30.9% | D+37.2 |
| Precinct -009 - WARD NINE009 - WARD NINE | 455 | 370 | 8 | 833 | 54.6% | 44.4% | D+10.2 |
| Precinct -001 - WARD ONE001 - WARD ONE | 423 | 119 | 8 | 550 | 76.9% | 21.6% | D+55.3 |
| Precinct -002 - WARD TWO002 - WARD TWO | 341 | 196 | 5 | 542 | 62.9% | 36.2% | D+26.8 |
| Precinct -006 - WARD SIX006 - WARD SIX | 400 | 116 | 2 | 518 | 77.2% | 22.4% | D+54.8 |
| Precinct -014 - WARD FOURTEEN014 - WARD FOURTEEN | 194 | 15 | 2 | 211 | 91.9% | 7.1% | D+84.8 |
| Ward Eight51590000008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ward Eleven51590000011 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ward Fifteen51590000015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ward Four51590000004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ward Fourteen51590000014 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ward Nine51590000009 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ward One51590000001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ward Seven51590000007 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ward Seventeen51590000017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ward Six51590000006 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ward Sixteen51590000016 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ward Ten51590000010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ward Thirteen51590000013 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ward Three51590000003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ward Twelve51590000012 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ward Two51590000002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +26.8% |
| 1896 | +21.7% |
| 1900 | +64.1% |
| 1904 | +75.1% |
| 1908 | +63.7% |
| 1912 | +77.2% |
| 1916 | +61.7% |
| 1920 | +54.0% |
| 1924 | +49.3% |
| 1928 | −32.7% |
| 1932 | +49.4% |
| 1936 | +70.7% |
| 1940 | +61.3% |
| 1944 | +43.3% |
| 1948 | +13.9% |
| 1952 | −17.7% |
| 1956 | −27.9% |
| 1960 | −30.2% |
| 1964 | −33.8% |
| 1968 | −13.6% |
| 1972 | −79.0% |
| 1976 | −22.1% |
| 1980 | −26.1% |
| 1984 | −34.7% |
| 1988 | −24.5% |
| 1992 | −7.4% |
| 1996 | −5.9% |
| 2000 | −6.6% |
| 2004 | +0.2% |
| 2008 | +19.1% |
| 2012 | +22.1% |
| 2016 | +19.8% |
| 2020 | +22.1% |
| 2024 | +21.0% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 28,450 |
| 2018 | 27,935 |
| 2020 | 28,395 |
| 2022 | 28,737 |
| 2024 | 29,102 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−114 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −1,225 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $44,802 in average income, against $52,991 for residents who stayed — 15% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+29.9 on average — 51 points more Republican-leaning than Danville city, VA itself (D+21.0).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Pittsylvania County, VA375R+43.1
- Guilford County, NC47D+21.8
- Rockingham County, NC40R+35.8
- Caswell County, NC38R+24.5
- Henry County, VA35R+32.8
- Halifax County, VA31R+21.0
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Pittsylvania County, VA356
- Guilford County, NC47
- Caswell County, NC41
- Rockingham County, NC35
- Halifax County, VA34
- Henry County, VA21
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −116 |
| 2012 | +194 |
| 2013 | +23 |
| 2014 | −320 |
| 2015 | −217 |
| 2016 | −149 |
| 2017 | −425 |
| 2018 | −165 |
| 2019 | −410 |
| 2021 | +86 |
| 2022 | +136 |
| 2023 | +201 |
| 2024 | +51 |
| 2025 | −114 |
Danville, a former textile hub on the North Carolina border, has shifted decisively toward Democrats over the past two decades as its population has grown majority-Black and its manufacturing base has contracted.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 77.2 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 79.0 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.1 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 21.0 points.
A population of 42,214, a 39% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $44,423 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Hinds County and Washington County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Danville city, Virginia. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/51590/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.