Use the president results table as the launch point for place dossiers, benchmark comparison, and layered explorer analysis.
Presidential Election · 1964
Elected President
Popular Vote
| State | EV | Cum. EV ▲ | Johnson % | Goldwater % | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | District of Columbia | 3 | 3 | 85.5% | 14.5% | |
| ▶ | Rhode Island | 4 | 7 | 80.9% | 19.1% | |
| ▶ | Hawaii | 4 | 11 | 78.8% | 21.2% | |
| ▶ | Massachusetts | 14 | 25 | 76.2% | 23.4% | |
| ▶ | Maine | 4 | 29 | 68.8% | 31.2% | |
| ▶ | New York | 43 | 72 | 68.6% | 31.3% | |
| ▶ | West Virginia | 7 | 79 | 67.9% | 32.1% | |
| ▶ | Connecticut | 8 | 87 | 67.8% | 32.1% | |
| ▶ | Michigan | 21 | 108 | 66.7% | 33.1% | |
| ▶ | Vermont | 3 | 111 | 66.3% | 33.7% | |
| ▶ | Alaska | 3 | 114 | 65.9% | 34.1% | |
| ▶ | New Jersey | 17 | 131 | 65.6% | 33.9% | |
| ▶ | Maryland | 10 | 141 | 65.5% | 34.5% | |
| ▶ | Pennsylvania | 29 | 170 | 64.9% | 34.7% | |
| ▶ | Kentucky | 9 | 179 | 64.0% | 35.6% | |
| ▶ | Minnesota | 10 | 189 | 63.8% | 36.0% | |
| ▶ | Oregon | 6 | 195 | 63.7% | 36.0% | |
| ▶ | New Hampshire | 4 | 199 | 63.6% | 36.4% | |
| ▶ | Texas | 25 | 224 | 63.3% | 36.5% | |
| ▶ | Ohio | 26 | 250 | 62.9% | 37.1% | |
| ▶ | Washington | 9 | 259 | 62.0% | 37.4% | |
| ▶ | Wisconsin | 12 | 271 | 62.1% | 37.7% | |
| ▶ | Iowa | 9 | 280 | 61.9% | 37.9% | |
| ▶ | Missouri | 12 | 292 | 53.7% | 30.2% | |
| ▶ | Colorado | 6 | 298 | 61.3% | 38.2% | |
| ▶ | Delaware | 3 | 301 | 61.0% | 38.8% | |
| ▶ | Illinois | 26 | 327 | 59.5% | 40.5% | |
| ▶ | New Mexico | 4 | 331 | 59.0% | 40.4% | |
| ▶ | Montana | 4 | 335 | 59.0% | 40.6% | |
| ▶ | California | 40 | 375 | 59.1% | 40.8% | |
| ▶ | Nevada | 3 | 378 | 58.6% | 41.4% | |
| ▶ | North Dakota | 4 | 382 | 58.0% | 41.9% | |
| ▶ | Wyoming | 3 | 385 | 56.6% | 43.4% | |
| ▶ | Arkansas | 6 | 391 | 56.1% | 43.4% | |
| ▶ | Indiana | 13 | 404 | 56.0% | 43.6% | |
| ▶ | North Carolina | 13 | 417 | 56.1% | 43.9% | |
| ▶ | Oklahoma | 8 | 425 | 55.8% | 44.3% | |
| ▶ | South Dakota | 4 | 429 | 55.6% | 44.4% | |
| ▶ | Tennessee | 11 | 440 | 55.5% | 44.5% | |
| ▶ | Utah | 4 | 444 | 54.7% | 45.3% | |
| ▶ | Kansas | 7 | 451 | 54.1% | 45.1% | |
| ▶ | Virginia | 12 | 463 | 53.5% | 46.2% | |
| ▶ | Nebraska | 5 | 468 | 52.6% | 47.4% | |
| ▶ | Florida | 14 | 482 | 51.1% | 48.9% | |
| ▶ | Idaho | 4 | 486 | 50.9% | 49.1% | |
| ▶ | Mississippi | 7 | 7 | 12.9% | 87.1% | |
| ▶ | Alabama | 10 | 17 | 30.6% | 69.5% | |
| ▶ | South Carolina | 8 | 25 | 41.1% | 58.9% | |
| ▶ | Louisiana | 10 | 35 | 43.2% | 56.8% | |
| ▶ | Georgia | 12 | 47 | 45.9% | 54.1% | |
| ▶ | Arizona | 5 | 52 | 49.5% | 50.5% |
Margin = (Dem votes − Rep votes) ÷ total votes × 100. Swing = current margin − 1960 margin. Cum. EV orders each winning ticket's states from largest win to closest win and accumulates the official EV awarded in each state, so the closest state is that candidate's final cumulative total.Other % shown when > 5% of total votes.
Default sort follows each winning ticket's cumulative EV path; click any header to switch views.