3 offices contested.
Use the state election layer as the entry point, then move into compare, demographic context, ancestry, religion, and the Historian without losing the current cycle.
Presidential Election · 1960
Elected President
Popular Vote
| State | EV | Cum. EV ▲ | Kennedy % | Nixon % | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | Rhode Island | 4 | 4 | 63.6% | 36.4% | |
| ▶ | Georgia | 12 | 16 | 62.5% | 37.4% | |
| ▶ | Louisiana | 10 | 26 | 50.4% | 28.6% | |
| ▶ | Massachusetts | 16 | 42 | 60.2% | 39.5% | |
| ▶ | Alabama | 11* | 47* | 56.8% | 42.1% | |
| ▶ | Arkansas | 6 | 53 | 50.8% | 43.1% | |
| ▶ | Connecticut | 8 | 61 | 53.7% | 46.3% | |
| ▶ | Maryland | 9 | 70 | 53.6% | 46.4% | |
| ▶ | West Virginia | 8 | 78 | 52.7% | 47.3% | |
| ▶ | New York | 45 | 123 | 52.5% | 47.3% | |
| ▶ | North Carolina | 14 | 137 | 52.1% | 47.9% | |
| ▶ | South Carolina | 8 | 145 | 51.2% | 48.8% | |
| ▶ | Nevada | 3 | 148 | 51.2% | 48.8% | |
| ▶ | Pennsylvania | 32 | 180 | 51.1% | 48.7% | |
| ▶ | Michigan | 20 | 200 | 50.9% | 48.8% | |
| ▶ | Texas | 24 | 224 | 50.5% | 48.5% | |
| ▶ | Delaware | 3 | 227 | 50.6% | 49.0% | |
| ▶ | Minnesota | 11 | 238 | 50.6% | 49.2% | |
| ▶ | New Jersey | 16 | 254 | 50.0% | 49.2% | |
| ▶ | New Mexico | 4 | 258 | 50.2% | 49.8% | |
| ▶ | Missouri | 13 | 271 | 43.0% | 42.6% | |
| ▶ | Illinois | 27 | 298 | 50.0% | 49.8% | |
| ▶ | Hawaii | 3 | 301 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| ▶ | Nebraska | 6 | 6 | 37.9% | 62.1% | |
| ▶ | Kansas | 8 | 14 | 39.1% | 60.5% | |
| ▶ | Oklahoma | 8* | 21* | 41.0% | 59.0% | |
| ▶ | Vermont | 3 | 24 | 41.4% | 58.6% | |
| ▶ | South Dakota | 4 | 28 | 41.8% | 58.2% | |
| ▶ | Maine | 5 | 33 | 43.0% | 57.0% | |
| ▶ | Iowa | 10 | 43 | 43.2% | 56.7% | |
| ▶ | Arizona | 4 | 47 | 44.4% | 55.5% | |
| ▶ | North Dakota | 4 | 51 | 44.5% | 55.4% | |
| ▶ | Indiana | 13 | 64 | 44.6% | 55.0% | |
| ▶ | Wyoming | 3 | 67 | 45.0% | 55.0% | |
| ▶ | Colorado | 6 | 73 | 44.9% | 54.6% | |
| ▶ | Utah | 4 | 77 | 45.2% | 54.8% | |
| ▶ | Idaho | 4 | 81 | 46.2% | 53.8% | |
| ▶ | Kentucky | 10 | 91 | 46.4% | 53.6% | |
| ▶ | Tennessee | 11 | 102 | 45.8% | 52.9% | |
| ▶ | New Hampshire | 4 | 106 | 46.6% | 53.4% | |
| ▶ | Ohio | 25 | 131 | 46.7% | 53.3% | |
| ▶ | Virginia | 12 | 143 | 47.0% | 52.4% | |
| ▶ | Oregon | 6 | 149 | 47.3% | 52.6% | |
| ▶ | Wisconsin | 12 | 161 | 48.0% | 51.8% | |
| ▶ | Florida | 10 | 171 | 48.5% | 51.5% | |
| ▶ | Montana | 4 | 175 | 48.6% | 51.1% | |
| ▶ | Washington | 9 | 184 | 48.3% | 50.7% | |
| ▶ | California | 32 | 216 | 49.5% | 50.1% | |
| ▶ | Mississippi | 8* | 8* | 36.3% | 24.7% | |
| ▶ | Alaska | 3 | 3 | 49.1% | 50.9% |
Margin = (Dem votes − Rep votes) ÷ total votes × 100. Swing = current margin − 1956 margin. Cum. EV orders each winning ticket's states from largest win to closest win and accumulates the official EV awarded in each state, so the closest state is that candidate's final cumulative total.Residual Other % shown when > 5% of total votes.
Default sort follows each winning ticket's cumulative EV path; click any header to switch views.
`*` indicates special Electoral College handling such as split electors, faithless electors, or blank ballots. Expand a row for details.
| State ▲ | Winner | W% | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | SparkmanDEM | 70.2% | ||
| ▶ | AllottREP | 53.5% | ||
| ▶ | BoggsREP | 50.7% | ||
| ▶ | RussellDEM | 99.9% | ||
| ▶ | DworshakREP | 52.3% | ||
| ▶ | DouglasDEM | 54.6% | ||
| ▶ | MillerREP | 51.9% | ||
| ▶ | SchoeppelREP | 54.6% | ||
| ▶ | CooperREP | 59.2% | ||
| ▶ | EllenderDEM | 79.8% | ||
| ▶ | SmithREP | 61.6% | ||
| ▶ | SaltonstallREP | 56.2% | ||
| ▶ | McNamaraDEM | 51.7% | ||
| ▶ | HumphreyDEM | 57.5% | ||
| ▶ | EastlandDEM | 91.8% | ||
| ▶ | Missouri(S) | LongDEM | 54.9% | |
| ▶ | MetcalfDEM | 50.7% | ||
| ▶ | CurtisREP | 58.9% | ||
| ▶ | BridgesREP | 60.4% | ||
| ▶ | CaseREP | 55.7% | ||
| ▶ | AndersonDEM | 63.4% | ||
| ▶ | JordanDEM | 61.4% | ||
| ▶ | North Dakota(S) | BurdickDEM | 49.7% | |
| ▶ | KerrDEM | 54.8% | ||
| ▶ | NeubergerDEM | 54.6% | ||
| ▶ | PellDEM | 68.9% | ||
| ▶ | ThurmondDEM | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | MundtREP | 52.4% | ||
| ▶ | KefauverDEM | 71.8% | ||
| ▶ | JohnsonDEM | 58.0% | ||
| ▶ | RobertsonDEM | 81.3% | ||
| ▶ | RandolphDEM | 55.3% | ||
| ▶ | ThomsonREP | 56.4% |
| State ▲ | Winner | W% | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | FanninREP | 59.3% | ||
| ▶ | FaubusDEM | 69.2% | ||
| ▶ | CarvelDEM | 51.7% | ||
| ▶ | BryantDEM | 59.9% | ||
| ▶ | KernerDEM | 55.5% | ||
| ▶ | WelshDEM | 50.4% | ||
| ▶ | ErbeREP | 52.1% | ||
| ▶ | AndersonREP | 55.5% | ||
| ▶ | DavisDEM | 80.5% | ||
| ▶ | VolpeREP | 52.5% | ||
| ▶ | SwainsonDEM | 50.5% | ||
| ▶ | AndersenREP | 50.6% | ||
| ▶ | DaltonDEM | 58.0% | ||
| ▶ | NutterREP | 55.1% | ||
| ▶ | MorrisonDEM | 52.0% | ||
| ▶ | PowellREP | 55.5% | ||
| ▶ | MechemREP | 50.3% | ||
| ▶ | GavinREP | 45.5% | ||
| ▶ | GuyDEM | 49.4% | ||
| ▶ | NotteDEM | 56.6% | ||
| ▶ | GubbrudREP | 50.7% | ||
| ▶ | DanielDEM | 72.8% | ||
| ▶ | ClydeREP | 52.7% | ||
| ▶ | KeyserREP | 56.4% | ||
| ▶ | RoselliniDEM | 50.3% | ||
| ▶ | BarronDEM | 54.0% | ||
| ▶ | NelsonDEM | 51.5% |