4 offices contested.
Use the state election layer as the entry point, then move into compare, demographic context, ancestry, religion, and the Historian without losing the current cycle.
Presidential Election · 1992
Elected President
Popular Vote
| State | EV | Cum. EV ▲ | Clinton % | Bush % | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | District of Columbia | 3 | 3 | 84.6% | 9.1% | |
| ▶ | Massachusetts | 12 | 15 | 47.5% | 29.0% | |
| ▶ | Rhode Island | 4 | 19 | 47.0% | 29.0% | |
| ▶ | Arkansas | 6 | 25 | 53.2% | 35.5% | |
| ▶ | New York | 33 | 58 | 49.7% | 33.9% | |
| ▶ | Vermont | 3 | 61 | 46.1% | 30.4% | |
| ▶ | Illinois | 22 | 83 | 48.6% | 34.3% | |
| ▶ | Maryland | 10 | 93 | 49.8% | 35.6% | |
| ▶ | California | 54 | 147 | 46.0% | 32.6% | |
| ▶ | West Virginia | 5 | 152 | 48.4% | 35.4% | |
| ▶ | Minnesota | 10 | 162 | 43.5% | 31.9% | |
| ▶ | Washington | 11 | 173 | 43.4% | 32.0% | |
| ▶ | Hawaii | 4 | 177 | 48.1% | 36.7% | |
| ▶ | Missouri | 11 | 188 | 44.1% | 33.9% | |
| ▶ | Oregon | 7 | 195 | 42.5% | 32.5% | |
| ▶ | Pennsylvania | 23 | 218 | 45.1% | 36.1% | |
| ▶ | New Mexico | 5 | 223 | 45.9% | 37.3% | |
| ▶ | Maine | 4 | 227 | 38.8% | 30.4% | |
| ▶ | Delaware | 3 | 230 | 43.5% | 35.3% | |
| ▶ | Michigan | 18 | 248 | 43.8% | 36.4% | |
| ▶ | Connecticut | 8 | 256 | 42.2% | 35.8% | |
| ▶ | Iowa | 7 | 263 | 43.3% | 37.3% | |
| ▶ | Tennessee | 11 | 274 | 47.1% | 42.4% | |
| ▶ | Louisiana | 9 | 283 | 45.6% | 41.0% | |
| ▶ | Wisconsin | 11 | 294 | 41.1% | 36.8% | |
| ▶ | Colorado | 8 | 302 | 40.1% | 35.9% | |
| ▶ | Kentucky | 8 | 310 | 44.5% | 41.3% | |
| ▶ | Nevada | 4 | 314 | 37.4% | 34.7% | |
| ▶ | Montana | 3 | 317 | 37.6% | 35.1% | |
| ▶ | New Jersey | 15 | 332 | 43.0% | 40.6% | |
| ▶ | Ohio | 21 | 353 | 40.2% | 38.4% | |
| ▶ | New Hampshire | 4 | 357 | 38.9% | 37.7% | |
| ▶ | Georgia | 13 | 370 | 43.5% | 42.9% | |
| ▶ | Nebraska | 5 | 5 | 29.4% | 46.6% | |
| ▶ | Utah | 5 | 10 | 24.6% | 43.4% | |
| ▶ | Idaho | 4 | 14 | 28.4% | 42.0% | |
| ▶ | North Dakota | 3 | 17 | 32.2% | 44.2% | |
| ▶ | Mississippi | 7 | 24 | 40.8% | 49.7% | |
| ▶ | Oklahoma | 8 | 32 | 34.0% | 42.6% | |
| ▶ | South Carolina | 8 | 40 | 39.9% | 48.0% | |
| ▶ | Alabama | 9 | 49 | 40.9% | 47.7% | |
| ▶ | Indiana | 12 | 61 | 36.8% | 42.9% | |
| ▶ | Wyoming | 3 | 64 | 34.0% | 39.5% | |
| ▶ | Kansas | 6 | 70 | 33.7% | 38.9% | |
| ▶ | Virginia | 13 | 83 | 40.6% | 45.0% | |
| ▶ | South Dakota | 3 | 86 | 37.1% | 40.7% | |
| ▶ | Texas | 32 | 118 | 37.1% | 40.6% | |
| ▶ | Arizona | 8 | 126 | 36.5% | 38.5% | |
| ▶ | Florida | 25 | 151 | 39.0% | 40.9% | |
| ▶ | North Carolina | 14 | 165 | 42.6% | 43.4% | |
| ▶ | Alaska | 3 | 3 | 30.3% | 39.5% |
Margin = (Dem votes − Rep votes) ÷ total votes × 100. Swing = current margin − 1988 margin. Cum. EV orders each winning ticket's states from largest win to closest win and accumulates the official EV awarded in each state, so the closest state is that candidate's final cumulative total.Residual Other % shown when > 5% of total votes.
Default sort follows each winning ticket's cumulative EV path; click any header to switch views.
| State ▲ | Winner | W% | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | ShelbyDEM | 64.9% | ||
| ▶ | McCainREP | 55.8% | ||
| ▶ | BumpersDEM | 60.2% | ||
| ▶ | BoxerDEM | 47.9% | ||
| ▶ | California(S) | FeinsteinDEM | 54.3% | |
| ▶ | CampbellDEM | 51.8% | ||
| ▶ | DoddDEM | 58.8% | ||
| ▶ | GrahamDEM | 65.4% | ||
| ▶ | RREP | 50.6% | ||
| ▶ | InouyeDEM | 57.3% | ||
| ▶ | KempthorneREP | 56.5% | ||
| ▶ | 53.3% | |||
| ▶ | CoatsREP | 57.3% | ||
| ▶ | GrassleyREP | 69.6% | ||
| ▶ | DoleREP | 62.7% | ||
| ▶ | FordDEM | 62.9% | ||
| ▶ | BreauxDEM | 79.7% | ||
| ▶ | MikulskiDEM | 71.0% | ||
| ▶ | BondREP | 51.9% | ||
| ▶ | ReidDEM | 51.0% | ||
| ▶ | GreggREP | 48.1% | ||
| ▶ | D'AmatoREP | 49.0% | ||
| ▶ | FairclothREP | 50.4% | ||
| ▶ | DorganDEM | 59.0% | ||
| ▶ | North Dakota(S) | ConradDEM | 63.2% | |
| ▶ | GlennDEM | 51.0% | ||
| ▶ | NicklesREP | 58.5% | ||
| ▶ | PackwoodREP | 52.1% | ||
| ▶ | SpecterREP | 49.1% | ||
| ▶ | HollingsDEM | 50.1% | ||
| ▶ | DaschleDEM | 64.9% | ||
| ▶ | BennettREP | 55.4% | ||
| ▶ | LeahyDEM | 54.2% | ||
| ▶ | MurrayDEM | 54.0% | ||
| ▶ | FeingoldDEM | 52.6% |
The year overview now keeps House inline detail lightweight so the full election-year page loads reliably. Use the full House results page for all candidate rows, district-level swing, and presidential-context columns.