37 contests
Use the us senate results table as the launch point for place dossiers, benchmark comparison, and layered explorer analysis.
| State ▲ | Winner | W% | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | SparkmanDEM | 82.5% | ||
| ▶ | McClellanDEM | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | California(S) | KuchelREP | 53.2% | |
| ▶ | AllottREP | 51.3% | ||
| ▶ | FrearDEM | 56.9% | ||
| ▶ | RussellDEM | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | DworshakREP | 62.8% | ||
| ▶ | DouglasDEM | 53.6% | ||
| ▶ | MartinREP | 52.2% | ||
| ▶ | SchoeppelREP | 56.3% | ||
| ▶ | BarkleyDEM | 54.5% | ||
| ▶ | EllenderDEM | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | SmithREP | 58.6% | ||
| ▶ | SaltonstallREP | 50.5% | ||
| ▶ | McNamaraDEM | 50.8% | ||
| ▶ | HumphreyDEM | 56.4% | ||
| ▶ | EastlandDEM | 95.6% | ||
| ▶ | MurrayDEM | 50.4% | ||
| ▶ | CurtisREP | 61.1% | ||
| ▶ | Nebraska(S) | HruskaREP | 58.2% | |
| ▶ | Nevada(S) | BibleDEM | 58.1% | |
| ▶ | BridgesREP | 60.2% | ||
| ▶ | CottonREP | 60.2% | ||
| ▶ | CaseREP | 48.7% | ||
| ▶ | AndersonDEM | 46.1% | ||
| ▶ | ScottDEM | 65.9% | ||
| ▶ | ErvinDEM | 62.4% | ||
| ▶ | Ohio(S) | BenderREP | 50.1% | |
| ▶ | KerrDEM | 55.8% | ||
| ▶ | NeubergerDEM | 50.2% | ||
| ▶ | GreenDEM | 59.3% | ||
| ▶ | MundtREP | 57.3% | ||
| ▶ | KefauverDEM | 70.0% | ||
| ▶ | JohnsonDEM | 84.7% | ||
| ▶ | RobertsonDEM | 79.9% | ||
| ▶ | NeelyDEM | 54.8% | ||
| ▶ | O'MahoneyDEM | 51.5% |