3 offices contested.
Use the state election layer as the entry point, then move into compare, demographic context, ancestry, religion, and the Historian without losing the current cycle.
Presidential Election · 1936
Elected President
Popular Vote
| State | EV | Cum. EV ▲ | Roosevelt % | Landon % | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | South Carolina | 8 | 8 | 98.6% | 1.4% | |
| ▶ | Mississippi | 9 | 17 | 97.0% | 3.0% | |
| ▶ | Louisiana | 10 | 27 | 88.8% | 11.1% | |
| ▶ | Texas | 23 | 50 | 87.0% | 12.4% | |
| ▶ | Georgia | 12 | 62 | 87.1% | 12.6% | |
| ▶ | Alabama | 11 | 73 | 86.4% | 12.8% | |
| ▶ | Arkansas | 9 | 82 | 81.8% | 17.9% | |
| ▶ | Florida | 7 | 89 | 76.1% | 23.9% | |
| ▶ | North Carolina | 13 | 102 | 73.4% | 26.6% | |
| ▶ | Nevada | 3 | 105 | 72.8% | 27.2% | |
| ▶ | Arizona | 3 | 108 | 69.8% | 26.9% | |
| ▶ | Montana | 4 | 112 | 69.3% | 27.6% | |
| ▶ | Virginia | 11 | 123 | 70.2% | 29.4% | |
| ▶ | Utah | 4 | 127 | 70.0% | 30.1% | |
| ▶ | Tennessee | 11 | 138 | 68.8% | 30.8% | |
| ▶ | Washington | 8 | 146 | 66.4% | 29.9% | |
| ▶ | California | 22 | 168 | 67.0% | 31.7% | |
| ▶ | Oregon | 5 | 173 | 64.4% | 29.6% | |
| ▶ | Oklahoma | 11 | 184 | 66.8% | 32.7% | |
| ▶ | Wisconsin | 12 | 196 | 63.8% | 30.3% | |
| ▶ | North Dakota | 4 | 200 | 59.6% | 26.6% | |
| ▶ | Minnesota | 11 | 211 | 61.8% | 31.0% | |
| ▶ | Idaho | 4 | 215 | 63.0% | 33.2% | |
| ▶ | Maryland | 8 | 223 | 64.2% | 35.2% | |
| ▶ | New Mexico | 3 | 226 | 62.6% | 36.5% | |
| ▶ | Colorado | 6 | 232 | 60.3% | 37.1% | |
| ▶ | Wyoming | 3 | 235 | 60.6% | 37.5% | |
| ▶ | Missouri | 15 | 250 | 57.5% | 36.1% | |
| ▶ | West Virginia | 8 | 258 | 60.6% | 39.2% | |
| ▶ | Ohio | 26 | 284 | 58.0% | 37.4% | |
| ▶ | New Jersey | 16 | 300 | 59.6% | 39.5% | |
| ▶ | Kentucky | 11 | 311 | 58.5% | 39.9% | |
| ▶ | Illinois | 29 | 340 | 57.7% | 39.7% | |
| ▶ | Michigan | 19 | 359 | 56.3% | 38.8% | |
| ▶ | Nebraska | 7 | 366 | 57.1% | 40.7% | |
| ▶ | Pennsylvania | 36 | 402 | 56.9% | 40.8% | |
| ▶ | Connecticut | 8 | 410 | 55.3% | 40.4% | |
| ▶ | New York | 47 | 457 | 53.9% | 39.0% | |
| ▶ | Indiana | 14 | 471 | 56.6% | 41.9% | |
| ▶ | Rhode Island | 4 | 475 | 53.0% | 40.3% | |
| ▶ | Delaware | 3 | 478 | 54.6% | 42.3% | |
| ▶ | Iowa | 11 | 489 | 54.4% | 42.7% | |
| ▶ | South Dakota | 4 | 493 | 54.0% | 42.5% | |
| ▶ | Massachusetts | 17 | 510 | 51.2% | 41.8% | |
| ▶ | Kansas | 9 | 519 | 53.7% | 46.0% | |
| ▶ | New Hampshire | 4 | 523 | 49.7% | 48.0% | |
| ▶ | Maine | 5 | 5 | 41.6% | 55.6% | |
| ▶ | Vermont | 3 | 8 | 43.2% | 56.4% |
Margin = (Dem votes − Rep votes) ÷ total votes × 100. Swing = current margin − 1932 margin. Cum. EV orders each winning ticket's states from largest win to closest win and accumulates the official EV awarded in each state, so the closest state is that candidate's final cumulative total.Other % shown when > 5% of total votes.
Default sort follows each winning ticket's cumulative EV path; click any header to switch views.
| State ▲ | Winner | W% | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | BankheadDEM | 87.0% | ||
| ▶ | RobinsonDEM | 81.8% | ||
| ▶ | JohnsonDEM | 63.5% | ||
| ▶ | HughesDEM | 53.0% | ||
| ▶ | Florida(S) | AndrewsDEM | 45.0% | |
| ▶ | RussellDEM | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | BorahREP | 63.4% | ||
| ▶ | LewisDEM | 56.5% | ||
| ▶ | HerringDEM | 50.5% | ||
| ▶ | Iowa(S) | GilletteDEM | 51.9% | |
| ▶ | CapperREP | 51.0% | ||
| ▶ | LoganDEM | 58.8% | ||
| ▶ | EllenderDEM | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | WhiteREP | 50.8% | ||
| ▶ | LodgeREP | 48.5% | ||
| ▶ | BrownDEM | 53.3% | ||
| ▶ | OtherOTH | 62.2% | ||
| ▶ | HarrisonDEM | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | MurrayDEM | 55.0% | ||
| ▶ | OtherOTH | 43.8% | ||
| ▶ | BridgesREP | 51.9% | ||
| ▶ | SmathersDEM | 54.9% | ||
| ▶ | HatchDEM | 61.7% | ||
| ▶ | New Mexico(S) | ChavezDEM | 55.7% | |
| ▶ | BaileyDEM | 70.8% | ||
| ▶ | LeeDEM | 68.0% | ||
| ▶ | McNaryREP | 49.7% | ||
| ▶ | GreenDEM | 48.6% | ||
| ▶ | ByrnesDEM | 98.6% | ||
| ▶ | BulowDEM | 48.8% | ||
| ▶ | BachmanDEM | 76.4% | ||
| ▶ | SheppardDEM | 92.6% | ||
| ▶ | GlassDEM | 92.0% | ||
| ▶ | NeelyDEM | 59.1% | ||
| ▶ | SchwartzDEM | 53.8% |
| State ▲ | Winner | W% | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | StanfordDEM | 70.7% | ||
| ▶ | BaileyDEM | 84.9% | ||
| ▶ | AmmonsDEM | 54.6% | ||
| ▶ | CrossDEM | 55.3% | ||
| ▶ | McMullenDEM | 51.6% | ||
| ▶ | ConeDEM | 80.9% | ||
| ▶ | ClarkDEM | 57.2% | ||
| ▶ | HornerDEM | 53.1% | ||
| ▶ | TownsendDEM | 55.4% | ||
| ▶ | KraschelDEM | 48.6% | ||
| ▶ | HuxmanDEM | 51.1% | ||
| ▶ | LecheDEM | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | BarrowsREP | 56.0% | ||
| ▶ | HurleyDEM | 47.6% | ||
| ▶ | MurphyDEM | 51.0% | ||
| ▶ | OtherOTH | 62.2% | ||
| ▶ | StarkDEM | 57.1% | ||
| ▶ | AyersDEM | 51.0% | ||
| ▶ | CochranDEM | 55.9% | ||
| ▶ | MurphyREP | 56.6% | ||
| ▶ | TingleyDEM | 57.2% | ||
| ▶ | LehmanDEM | 48.7% | ||
| ▶ | HoeyDEM | 66.9% | ||
| ▶ | OtherOTH | 36.0% | ||
| ▶ | DaveyDEM | 52.0% | ||
| ▶ | QuinnDEM | 53.7% | ||
| ▶ | JensenREP | 51.6% | ||
| ▶ | BrowningDEM | 80.4% | ||
| ▶ | AllredDEM | 92.9% | ||
| ▶ | BloodDEM | 51.0% | ||
| ▶ | AikenREP | 60.9% | ||
| ▶ | MartinDEM | 69.4% | ||
| ▶ | HoltDEM | 59.2% | ||
| ▶ | OtherOTH | 48.9% |