3 offices contested.
Use the state election layer as the entry point, then move into compare, demographic context, ancestry, religion, and the Historian without losing the current cycle.
Presidential Election · 1932
Elected President
Popular Vote
| State | EV | Cum. EV ▲ | Roosevelt % | Hoover % | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | South Carolina | 8 | 8 | 98.0% | 1.9% | |
| ▶ | Mississippi | 9 | 17 | 96.0% | 3.5% | |
| ▶ | Louisiana | 10 | 27 | 92.8% | 7.0% | |
| ▶ | Georgia | 12 | 39 | 91.6% | 7.8% | |
| ▶ | Texas | 23 | 62 | 88.2% | 11.2% | |
| ▶ | Arkansas | 9 | 71 | 86.3% | 12.7% | |
| ▶ | Alabama | 11 | 82 | 84.7% | 14.1% | |
| ▶ | Florida | 7 | 89 | 74.9% | 25.1% | |
| ▶ | Oklahoma | 11 | 100 | 73.3% | 26.7% | |
| ▶ | North Dakota | 4 | 104 | 69.6% | 28.0% | |
| ▶ | North Carolina | 13 | 117 | 69.9% | 29.3% | |
| ▶ | Virginia | 11 | 128 | 68.8% | 29.8% | |
| ▶ | Nevada | 3 | 131 | 69.5% | 30.5% | |
| ▶ | Arizona | 3 | 134 | 67.0% | 30.5% | |
| ▶ | Tennessee | 11 | 145 | 66.5% | 32.5% | |
| ▶ | Wisconsin | 12 | 157 | 63.5% | 31.2% | |
| ▶ | South Dakota | 4 | 161 | 63.6% | 34.4% | |
| ▶ | Maryland | 8 | 169 | 62.6% | 34.7% | |
| ▶ | Nebraska | 7 | 176 | 63.0% | 35.3% | |
| ▶ | Missouri | 15 | 191 | 60.3% | 33.2% | |
| ▶ | New Mexico | 3 | 194 | 62.8% | 35.7% | |
| ▶ | Minnesota | 11 | 205 | 59.9% | 36.3% | |
| ▶ | Washington | 8 | 213 | 57.5% | 33.9% | |
| ▶ | Montana | 4 | 217 | 58.8% | 36.0% | |
| ▶ | Oregon | 5 | 222 | 58.0% | 36.9% | |
| ▶ | California | 22 | 244 | 58.4% | 37.4% | |
| ▶ | Idaho | 4 | 248 | 58.7% | 38.2% | |
| ▶ | Kentucky | 11 | 259 | 59.1% | 40.1% | |
| ▶ | Iowa | 11 | 270 | 59.1% | 40.9% | |
| ▶ | Utah | 4 | 274 | 56.6% | 41.0% | |
| ▶ | Wyoming | 3 | 277 | 56.1% | 40.8% | |
| ▶ | Colorado | 6 | 283 | 54.9% | 41.3% | |
| ▶ | Illinois | 29 | 312 | 55.2% | 42.0% | |
| ▶ | New York | 47 | 359 | 54.1% | 41.3% | |
| ▶ | Rhode Island | 4 | 363 | 55.1% | 43.3% | |
| ▶ | Indiana | 14 | 377 | 54.7% | 42.9% | |
| ▶ | West Virginia | 8 | 385 | 54.5% | 44.5% | |
| ▶ | Kansas | 9 | 394 | 53.6% | 44.1% | |
| ▶ | Michigan | 19 | 413 | 52.4% | 44.4% | |
| ▶ | Massachusetts | 17 | 430 | 50.6% | 46.6% | |
| ▶ | Ohio | 26 | 456 | 49.9% | 47.0% | |
| ▶ | New Jersey | 16 | 472 | 49.5% | 47.6% | |
| ▶ | Vermont | 3 | 3 | 41.1% | 57.7% | |
| ▶ | Maine | 5 | 8 | 43.2% | 55.8% | |
| ▶ | Pennsylvania | 36 | 44 | 45.3% | 50.8% | |
| ▶ | Delaware | 3 | 47 | 48.1% | 50.5% | |
| ▶ | New Hampshire | 4 | 51 | 49.0% | 50.4% | |
| ▶ | Connecticut | 8 | 59 | 47.4% | 48.5% |
Margin = (Dem votes − Rep votes) ÷ total votes × 100. Swing = current margin − 1928 margin. Cum. EV orders each winning ticket's states from largest win to closest win and accumulates the official EV awarded in each state, so the closest state is that candidate's final cumulative total.Other % shown when > 5% of total votes.
Default sort follows each winning ticket's cumulative EV path; click any header to switch views.
| State ▲ | Winner | W% | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | BlackDEM | 86.3% | ||
| ▶ | HaydenDEM | 66.7% | ||
| ▶ | CarawayDEM | 89.5% | ||
| ▶ | McAdooDEM | 43.4% | ||
| ▶ | AdamsDEM | 51.9% | ||
| ▶ | LonerganDEM | 48.5% | ||
| ▶ | OtherOTH | 57.9% | ||
| ▶ | GeorgeDEM | 92.8% | ||
| ▶ | Georgia(S) | RussellDEM | 100.0% | |
| ▶ | PopeDEM | 55.7% | ||
| ▶ | DieterichDEM | 52.2% | ||
| ▶ | NuysDEM | 55.6% | ||
| ▶ | MurphyDEM | 54.9% | ||
| ▶ | McGillDEM | 45.7% | ||
| ▶ | BarkleyDEM | 59.1% | ||
| ▶ | OvertonDEM | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | TydingsDEM | 67.8% | ||
| ▶ | ClarkDEM | 62.6% | ||
| ▶ | McCarranDEM | 52.1% | ||
| ▶ | BrownDEM | 50.4% | ||
| ▶ | New Jersey(S) | BarbourREP | 49.6% | |
| ▶ | WagnerDEM | 56.3% | ||
| ▶ | ReynoldsDEM | 68.3% | ||
| ▶ | NyeREP | 72.3% | ||
| ▶ | BulkleyDEM | 52.5% | ||
| ▶ | ThomasDEM | 65.6% | ||
| ▶ | SteiwerREP | 52.7% | ||
| ▶ | DavisREP | 49.3% | ||
| ▶ | SmithDEM | 98.1% | ||
| ▶ | NorbeckREP | 53.8% | ||
| ▶ | ThomasDEM | 56.7% | ||
| ▶ | DaleREP | 49.2% | ||
| ▶ | BoneDEM | 60.6% | ||
| ▶ | DuffyDEM | 57.0% |
| State ▲ | Winner | W% | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▶ | MoeurDEM | 63.2% | ||
| ▶ | FutrellDEM | 90.4% | ||
| ▶ | JohnsonDEM | 57.2% | ||
| ▶ | CrossDEM | 49.0% | ||
| ▶ | BuckREP | 54.2% | ||
| ▶ | SholtzDEM | 66.6% | ||
| ▶ | RossDEM | 61.7% | ||
| ▶ | HornerDEM | 57.6% | ||
| ▶ | McNuttDEM | 55.0% | ||
| ▶ | HerringDEM | 52.8% | ||
| ▶ | LandonREP | 34.8% | ||
| ▶ | AllenDEM | 100.0% | ||
| ▶ | BrannDEM | 50.3% | ||
| ▶ | ElyDEM | 52.8% | ||
| ▶ | ComstockDEM | 54.9% | ||
| ▶ | OtherOTH | 51.2% | ||
| ▶ | ParkDEM | 59.3% | ||
| ▶ | EricksonDEM | 48.5% | ||
| ▶ | BryanDEM | 52.5% | ||
| ▶ | WinantREP | 54.2% | ||
| ▶ | SeligmanDEM | 54.8% | ||
| ▶ | LehmanDEM | 56.7% | ||
| ▶ | EhringhausDEM | 70.1% | ||
| ▶ | LangerREP | 54.8% | ||
| ▶ | WhiteDEM | 52.8% | ||
| ▶ | GreenDEM | 55.2% | ||
| ▶ | BerryDEM | 55.6% | ||
| ▶ | McAlisterDEM | 42.3% | ||
| ▶ | FergusonDEM | 61.6% | ||
| ▶ | BloodDEM | 56.4% | ||
| ▶ | WilsonREP | 62.0% | ||
| ▶ | MartinDEM | 57.3% | ||
| ▶ | KumpDEM | 53.8% | ||
| ▶ | SchmedemanDEM | 52.5% |