- Lead
- 2,758
- Total
- 8,856
- vs nation
- R+29.7
- Turnout
- 77.2%
Price County, WI
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 77.2% of 11,551 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 2,362
- Total
- 8,546
- vs nation
- R+32.1
- Turnout
- 78.3%
- Lead
- 1,892
- Total
- 7,568
- vs nation
- R+27.1
- Turnout
- 68.2%
- Lead
- 3
- Total
- 7,901
- vs nation
- R+3.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,098
- Total
- 8,194
- vs nation
- D+6.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 37
- Total
- 8,763
- vs nation
- D+2.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 723
- Total
- 7,930
- vs nation
- R+9.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 978
- Total
- 7,390
- vs nation
- D+4.7
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+31.1MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 14,0922024 5-year
- Median household income
- $60,5462024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 93.1%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.1%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 1.8%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+37.7 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+65.5 in 1904MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Rusk County, WI · twin score 89.3
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 77.2%8,913 participants ÷ 11,551 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +15.9 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- +0.4 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 61.2%–65.8%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 7,686 | 11,266 | 68.2% | B/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 6,742 | 10,990 | 61.3% | B/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 8,566 | 10,938 | 78.3% | B/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 7,131 | 11,429 | 62.4% | B/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 8,913 | 11,551 | 77.2% | B/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 292/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 296/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 300/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 305/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 310/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
23 precincts · 8,856 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -CITY OF PARK FALLS WARDS 1-7CITY OF PARK FALLS WARDS 1-7 | 497 | 662 | 14 | 1,173 | 42.4% | 56.4% | R+14.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -TOWN OF WORCESTER WARDS 1-3TOWN OF WORCESTER WARDS 1-3 | 349 | 736 | 9 | 1,094 | 31.9% | 67.3% | R+35.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LAKE WARDS 1-2TOWN OF LAKE WARDS 1-2 | 299 | 467 | 6 | 772 | 38.7% | 60.5% | R+21.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ELK WARDS 1-2TOWN OF ELK WARDS 1-2 | 257 | 453 | 14 | 724 | 35.5% | 62.6% | R+27.1 |
| Precinct -CITY OF PHILLIPS WARDS 1-4CITY OF PHILLIPS WARDS 1-4 | 283 | 428 | 7 | 718 | 39.4% | 59.6% | R+20.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF OGEMA WARDS 1-2TOWN OF OGEMA WARDS 1-2 | 106 | 339 | 6 | 451 | 23.5% | 75.2% | R+51.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF FIFIELD WARD 1TOWN OF FIFIELD WARD 1 | 147 | 292 | 2 | 441 | 33.3% | 66.2% | R+32.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF EISENSTEIN WARDS 1-2TOWN OF EISENSTEIN WARDS 1-2 | 153 | 260 | 5 | 418 | 36.6% | 62.2% | R+25.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF FLAMBEAU WARD 1TOWN OF FLAMBEAU WARD 1 | 112 | 273 | 1 | 386 | 29.0% | 70.7% | R+41.7 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF PRENTICE WARD 1VILLAGE OF PRENTICE WARD 1 | 97 | 226 | 2 | 325 | 29.8% | 69.5% | R+39.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF PRENTICE WARD 1TOWN OF PRENTICE WARD 1 | 80 | 201 | 5 | 286 | 28.0% | 70.3% | R+42.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF FIFIELD WARD 2TOWN OF FIFIELD WARD 2 | 90 | 160 | 0 | 250 | 36.0% | 64.0% | R+28.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF HILL WARD 1TOWN OF HILL WARD 1 | 67 | 179 | 2 | 248 | 27.0% | 72.2% | R+45.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SPIRIT WARD 1TOWN OF SPIRIT WARD 1 | 70 | 160 | 4 | 234 | 29.9% | 68.4% | R+38.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF KNOX WARD 1TOWN OF KNOX WARD 1 | 71 | 147 | 2 | 220 | 32.3% | 66.8% | R+34.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF EMERY WARD 1TOWN OF EMERY WARD 1 | 63 | 145 | 0 | 208 | 30.3% | 69.7% | R+39.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF KENNAN WARD 1TOWN OF KENNAN WARD 1 | 56 | 147 | 2 | 205 | 27.3% | 71.7% | R+44.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CATAWBA WARD 1TOWN OF CATAWBA WARD 1 | 48 | 128 | 2 | 178 | 27.0% | 71.9% | R+44.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF HARMONY WARD 1TOWN OF HARMONY WARD 1 | 46 | 95 | 1 | 142 | 32.4% | 66.9% | R+34.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF HACKETT WARD 1TOWN OF HACKETT WARD 1 | 37 | 88 | 0 | 125 | 29.6% | 70.4% | R+40.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GEORGETOWN WARD 1TOWN OF GEORGETOWN WARD 1 | 26 | 66 | 1 | 93 | 28.0% | 71.0% | R+43.0 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF KENNAN WARD 1VILLAGE OF KENNAN WARD 1 | 25 | 60 | 1 | 86 | 29.1% | 69.8% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF CATAWBA WARD 1VILLAGE OF CATAWBA WARD 1 | 26 | 51 | 2 | 79 | 32.9% | 64.6% | R+31.6 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −10.7% |
| 1896 | −43.5% |
| 1900 | −51.4% |
| 1904 | −65.5% |
| 1908 | −42.3% |
| 1912 | −1.9% |
| 1916 | −19.9% |
| 1920 | −60.6% |
| 1924 | −26.8% |
| 1928 | −17.8% |
| 1932 | +32.4% |
| 1936 | +37.7% |
| 1940 | +2.0% |
| 1944 | +3.8% |
| 1948 | +6.2% |
| 1952 | −17.7% |
| 1956 | −18.3% |
| 1960 | −2.5% |
| 1964 | +28.1% |
| 1968 | −4.6% |
| 1972 | −12.7% |
| 1976 | +11.1% |
| 1980 | −5.3% |
| 1984 | −10.3% |
| 1988 | +7.2% |
| 1992 | +10.8% |
| 1996 | +13.2% |
| 2000 | −9.1% |
| 2004 | +0.4% |
| 2008 | +13.4% |
| 2012 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | −25.0% |
| 2020 | −27.6% |
| 2024 | −31.1% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−42 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +178 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $57,448 in average income, against $61,533 for residents who stayed — 7% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+33.4 on average — 2.2 points more Republican-leaning than Price County, WI itself (R+31.1).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Marathon County, WI29R+18.6
- Taylor County, WI29R+48.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Marathon County, WI30
- Taylor County, WI30
- Ashland County, WI22
- Dane County, WI21
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −64 |
| 2012 | −108 |
| 2013 | −36 |
| 2014 | −48 |
| 2015 | +19 |
| 2016 | −101 |
| 2017 | +54 |
| 2018 | +13 |
| 2019 | +16 |
| 2021 | +135 |
| 2022 | +221 |
| 2023 | +22 |
| 2024 | +97 |
| 2025 | −42 |
Price County's roughly 15,800 residents are spread across forested townships in Wisconsin's north, and its presidential margins have shifted more than 30 points toward Republicans over the past two decades — a pattern common to rural timber-economy counties across the upper Midwest.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 37.7 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 65.5 points in 1904. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.5 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 31.1 points.
A population of 14,092, a 93% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $60,546 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Rusk County and Lincoln County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Price County, Wisconsin. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/55099/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.