- Lead
- 8,020
- Total
- 21,199
- vs nation
- R+36.4
- Turnout
- 75.5%
McLeod County, MN
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 75.5% of 28,213 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 7,573
- Total
- 20,933
- vs nation
- R+40.6
- Turnout
- 77.9%
- Lead
- 7,177
- Total
- 18,807
- vs nation
- R+40.3
- Turnout
- 71.2%
- Lead
- 4,101
- Total
- 18,553
- vs nation
- R+26.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,488
- Total
- 19,029
- vs nation
- R+25.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,695
- Total
- 18,412
- vs nation
- R+23.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,173
- Total
- 15,394
- vs nation
- R+21.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 553
- Total
- 14,063
- vs nation
- R+4.6
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+37.8MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 36,7982024 5-year
- Median household income
- $80,0842024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 88.2%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.6%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 7.6%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+38.0 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+61.3 in 1920MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Sibley County, MN · twin score 86.6
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 75.5%21,309 participants ÷ 28,213 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +18.8 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -1.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 56.7%–58.6%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 18,952 | 26,617 | 71.2% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 15,058 | 26,781 | 56.2% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 21,018 | 26,976 | 77.9% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 16,529 | 27,963 | 59.1% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 21,309 | 28,213 | 75.5% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
57 precincts · 21,199 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -HUTCHINSON CITY P-3HUTCHINSON CITY P-3 | 1,053 | 1,750 | 56 | 2,859 | 36.8% | 61.2% | R+24.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -HUTCHINSON CITY P-1HUTCHINSON CITY P-1 | 1,023 | 1,749 | 59 | 2,831 | 36.1% | 61.8% | R+25.6 |
| Precinct -HUTCHINSON CITY P-2HUTCHINSON CITY P-2 | 920 | 1,386 | 55 | 2,361 | 39.0% | 58.7% | R+19.7 |
| Precinct -WINSTED CITYWINSTED CITY | 331 | 895 | 28 | 1,254 | 26.4% | 71.4% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct -LESTER PRAIRIE CITYLESTER PRAIRIE CITY | 253 | 707 | 17 | 977 | 25.9% | 72.4% | R+46.5 |
| Precinct -GLENCOE CITY P-3GLENCOE CITY P-3 | 266 | 566 | 20 | 852 | 31.2% | 66.4% | R+35.2 |
| Precinct -ACOMA TWPACOMA TWP | 221 | 582 | 12 | 815 | 27.1% | 71.4% | R+44.3 |
| Precinct -HUTCHINSON TWPHUTCHINSON TWP | 185 | 614 | 13 | 812 | 22.8% | 75.6% | R+52.8 |
| Precinct -GLENCOE CITY P-1GLENCOE CITY P-1 | 235 | 499 | 19 | 753 | 31.2% | 66.3% | R+35.1 |
| Precinct -GLENCOE CITY P-2GLENCOE CITY P-2 | 255 | 465 | 16 | 736 | 34.6% | 63.2% | R+28.5 |
| Precinct -GLENCOE CITY P-4GLENCOE CITY P-4 | 206 | 403 | 17 | 626 | 32.9% | 64.4% | R+31.5 |
| Precinct -WINSTED TWPWINSTED TWP | 140 | 475 | 11 | 626 | 22.4% | 75.9% | R+53.5 |
| Precinct -BERGEN TWPBERGEN TWP | 117 | 463 | 10 | 590 | 19.8% | 78.5% | R+58.6 |
| Precinct -HALE TWPHALE TWP | 105 | 448 | 13 | 566 | 18.6% | 79.2% | R+60.6 |
| Precinct -HELEN TWP P-2HELEN TWP P-2 | 102 | 393 | 8 | 503 | 20.3% | 78.1% | R+57.9 |
| Precinct -RICH VALLEY TWPRICH VALLEY TWP | 108 | 346 | 4 | 458 | 23.6% | 75.5% | R+52.0 |
| Precinct -SILVER LAKE CITYSILVER LAKE CITY | 154 | 283 | 12 | 449 | 34.3% | 63.0% | R+28.7 |
| Precinct -HASSAN VALLEY TWPHASSAN VALLEY TWP | 104 | 332 | 10 | 446 | 23.3% | 74.4% | R+51.1 |
| Precinct -BROWNTON CITYBROWNTON CITY | 106 | 301 | 8 | 415 | 25.5% | 72.5% | R+47.0 |
| Precinct -LYNN TWPLYNN TWP | 78 | 281 | 8 | 367 | 21.3% | 76.6% | R+55.3 |
| Precinct -GLENCOE TWPGLENCOE TWP | 67 | 272 | 8 | 347 | 19.3% | 78.4% | R+59.1 |
| Precinct -SUMTER TWPSUMTER TWP | 75 | 249 | 4 | 328 | 22.9% | 75.9% | R+53.0 |
| Precinct -COLLINS TWPCOLLINS TWP | 80 | 238 | 3 | 321 | 24.9% | 74.1% | R+49.2 |
| Precinct -STEWART CITYSTEWART CITY | 70 | 176 | 9 | 255 | 27.5% | 69.0% | R+41.6 |
| Precinct -PLATO CITYPLATO CITY | 29 | 177 | 3 | 209 | 13.9% | 84.7% | R+70.8 |
| Precinct -PENN TWPPENN TWP | 35 | 159 | 3 | 197 | 17.8% | 80.7% | R+62.9 |
| Precinct -ROUND GROVE TWPROUND GROVE TWP | 21 | 121 | 5 | 147 | 14.3% | 82.3% | R+68.0 |
| Precinct -BISCAY CITYBISCAY CITY | 25 | 39 | 0 | 64 | 39.1% | 60.9% | R+21.9 |
| Precinct -HELEN TWP P-1HELEN TWP P-1 | 10 | 25 | 0 | 35 | 28.6% | 71.4% | R+42.9 |
| Acoma Twp. Voting District27_270850005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Bergen Twp. Voting District27_270850010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Biscay Voting District27_270850015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brownton Voting District27_270850020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Collins Twp. Voting District27_270850025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Glencoe P-127_270850030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Glencoe P-227_270850035 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Glencoe P-327_270850040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Glencoe P-427_270850045 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Glencoe Twp. Voting District27_270850050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hale Twp. Voting District27_270850055 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hassan Valley Twp. Voting District27_270850060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Helen Twp. Voting District27_270850065 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hutchinson P-127_270850070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hutchinson P-227_270850075 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hutchinson P-327_270850080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hutchinson Twp. Voting District27_270850095 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lester Prairie Voting District27_270850100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lynn Twp. Voting District27_270850105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Penn Twp. Voting District27_270850110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Plato Voting District27_270850115 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Rich Valley Twp. Voting District27_270850120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Round Grove Twp. Voting District27_270850125 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Silver Lake Voting District27_270850130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Stewart Voting District27_270850135 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Sumter Twp. Voting District27_270850140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Winsted Twp. Voting District27_270850150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Winsted Voting District27_270850145 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +22.2% |
| 1896 | +1.7% |
| 1900 | −4.5% |
| 1904 | −28.8% |
| 1908 | −2.3% |
| 1912 | +19.8% |
| 1916 | −14.6% |
| 1920 | −61.3% |
| 1924 | −36.0% |
| 1928 | −10.4% |
| 1932 | +38.0% |
| 1936 | +18.7% |
| 1940 | −38.1% |
| 1944 | −38.3% |
| 1948 | −7.3% |
| 1952 | −44.4% |
| 1956 | −37.4% |
| 1960 | −25.5% |
| 1964 | +1.9% |
| 1968 | −14.6% |
| 1972 | −25.8% |
| 1976 | −2.0% |
| 1980 | −20.2% |
| 1984 | −28.1% |
| 1988 | −16.1% |
| 1992 | −3.3% |
| 1996 | +3.9% |
| 2000 | −20.6% |
| 2004 | −25.5% |
| 2008 | −18.3% |
| 2012 | −22.1% |
| 2016 | −38.2% |
| 2020 | −36.2% |
| 2024 | −37.8% |
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 22,232 |
| 2018 | 21,585 |
| 2020 | 23,505 |
| 2022 | 23,595 |
| 2024 | 25,109 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−200 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −1,778 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $60,232 in average income, against $81,195 for residents who stayed — 26% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+11.4 on average — 26 points more Democratic-leaning than McLeod County, MN itself (R+37.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Carver County, MN126R+5.4
- Hennepin County, MN107D+42.4
- Wright County, MN88R+29.2
- Meeker County, MN78R+42.7
- Sibley County, MN52R+42.9
- Renville County, MN43R+41.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Carver County, MN105
- Hennepin County, MN100
- Meeker County, MN87
- Wright County, MN79
- Renville County, MN41
- Sibley County, MN41
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −401 |
| 2012 | −508 |
| 2013 | −190 |
| 2014 | −209 |
| 2015 | −98 |
| 2016 | −124 |
| 2017 | +46 |
| 2018 | −81 |
| 2019 | +17 |
| 2021 | +84 |
| 2022 | −39 |
| 2023 | +27 |
| 2024 | −102 |
| 2025 | −200 |
McLeod County, anchored by Hutchinson, has shifted steadily rightward over the past two decades; its 2024 presidential margin of R+37.8 reflects a pattern of lopsided results common to agriculturally dominant, small-city counties in the region.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 38.0 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 61.3 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.7 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 37.8 points.
A population of 36,798, a 88% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $80,084 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Sibley County and Martin County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
McLeod County, Minnesota. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/27085/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.