HarrisDemocratic62.8%37,213TrumpRepublican35.4%21,004OtherAll other candidates1.6%942
D+27.4- Lead
- 16,209
- Total
- 59,256
- vs nation
- D+28.8
- Turnout
- 53.9%
Akashiccounty
Monroe County, IN
Office (updates table and map)
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
President results by year
2024 turnout 53.9% of 111,625 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic63.1%39,861TrumpRepublican34.9%22,071JorgensenLibertarian1.7%1,105
D+28.2- Lead
- 17,790
- Total
- 63,151
- vs nation
- D+23.7
- Turnout
- 55.9%
ClintonDemocratic58.6%34,183TrumpRepublican35.2%20,527JohnsonLibertarian5.0%2,917
D+23.4- Lead
- 13,656
- Total
- 58,356
- vs nation
- D+21.3
- Turnout
- 53.8%
ObamaDemocratic58.4%33,436RomneyRepublican39.3%22,481JohnsonLibertarian2.2%1,264
D+19.1- Lead
- 10,955
- Total
- 57,223
- vs nation
- D+15.3
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic65.6%41,450McCainRepublican33.4%21,118OtherAll other candidates1.0%647
D+32.2- Lead
- 20,332
- Total
- 63,215
- vs nation
- D+24.9
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic53.4%26,965BushRepublican45.2%22,834OtherAll other candidates1.3%668
D+8.2- Lead
- 4,131
- Total
- 50,467
- vs nation
- D+10.6
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic43.6%17,523BushRepublican47.6%19,147OtherAll other candidates8.8%3,550
R+4.0- Lead
- 1,624
- Total
- 40,220
- vs nation
- R+4.6
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic46.8%18,531DoleRepublican42.3%16,744PerotReform8.0%3,179
D+4.5- Lead
- 1,787
- Total
- 39,609
- vs nation
- R+4.0
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- D+27.4MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 140,9652024 5-year
- Median household income
- $65,8682024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 80.7%2024 5-year
- Black
- 3.5%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 4.8%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+32.2 in 2008MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+34.4 in 1928MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Boone County, MO · twin score 96.1
Midterm durability
Total general-election participants divided by same-year citizen voting-age population. These are total ballots or participating voters—not presidential candidate votes.
- 2024 total turnout
- 53.9%60,210 participants ÷ 111,625 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +19.2 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off versus state
- -5.9 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026 scenario
- 34.7%–49.8%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
| Election | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 · Presidential | 60,525 | 112,431 | 53.8% | A/A |
| 2018 · Midterm | 74,122 | 114,280 | 64.9% | A/A |
| 2020 · Presidential | 64,972 | 116,141 | 55.9% | A/A |
| 2022 · Midterm | 40,797 | 111,107 | 36.7% | A/A |
| 2024 · Presidential | 60,210 | 111,625 | 53.9% | A/A |
Sources and methods
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
Precinct data
Results by precinct
150 precincts · 59,598 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -RICHLAND 8RICHLAND 8 | 769 | 700 | 37 | 1,506 | 51.1% | 46.5% | D+4.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -PERRY 23PERRY 23 | 888 | 572 | 30 | 1,490 | 59.6% | 38.4% | D+21.2 |
| Precinct -VAN BUREN 01VAN BUREN 01 | 770 | 548 | 33 | 1,351 | 57.0% | 40.6% | D+16.4 |
| Precinct -CLEAR CREEK 01CLEAR CREEK 01 | 502 | 701 | 37 | 1,240 | 40.5% | 56.5% | R+16.0 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTONWASHINGTON | 518 | 693 | 27 | 1,238 | 41.8% | 56.0% | R+14.1 |
| Precinct -PERRY 27PERRY 27 | 760 | 415 | 33 | 1,208 | 62.9% | 34.4% | D+28.6 |
| Precinct -PERRY 21PERRY 21 | 895 | 269 | 28 | 1,192 | 75.1% | 22.6% | D+52.5 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 01RICHLAND 01 | 554 | 607 | 28 | 1,189 | 46.6% | 51.1% | R+4.5 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 04RICHLAND 04 | 568 | 568 | 31 | 1,167 | 48.7% | 48.7% | Exact tie |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 07RICHLAND 07 | 614 | 488 | 23 | 1,125 | 54.6% | 43.4% | D+11.2 |
| Precinct -PERRY 05PERRY 05 | 731 | 322 | 30 | 1,083 | 67.5% | 29.7% | D+37.8 |
| Precinct -PERRY 4PERRY 4 | 689 | 361 | 25 | 1,075 | 64.1% | 33.6% | D+30.5 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 2RICHLAND 2 | 513 | 539 | 21 | 1,073 | 47.8% | 50.2% | R+2.4 |
| Precinct -VAN BUREN 04VAN BUREN 04 | 339 | 707 | 14 | 1,060 | 32.0% | 66.7% | R+34.7 |
| Precinct -BENTON 01BENTON 01 | 536 | 491 | 26 | 1,053 | 50.9% | 46.6% | D+4.3 |
| Precinct -CLEAR CREEK 03CLEAR CREEK 03 | 507 | 524 | 18 | 1,049 | 48.3% | 50.0% | R+1.6 |
| Precinct -PERRY 24PERRY 24 | 499 | 521 | 19 | 1,039 | 48.0% | 50.1% | R+2.1 |
| Precinct -VAN BUREN 06VAN BUREN 06 | 471 | 503 | 29 | 1,003 | 47.0% | 50.1% | R+3.2 |
| Precinct -BENTON 02BENTON 02 | 597 | 380 | 23 | 1,000 | 59.7% | 38.0% | D+21.7 |
| Precinct -SALT CREEKSALT CREEK | 594 | 363 | 25 | 982 | 60.5% | 37.0% | D+23.5 |
| Precinct -PERRY 22PERRY 22 | 675 | 277 | 21 | 973 | 69.4% | 28.5% | D+40.9 |
| Precinct -VAN BUREN 05VAN BUREN 05 | 381 | 550 | 18 | 949 | 40.1% | 58.0% | R+17.8 |
| Precinct -VAN BUREN 03VAN BUREN 03 | 584 | 321 | 17 | 922 | 63.3% | 34.8% | D+28.5 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 12BLOOMINGTON 12 | 535 | 357 | 25 | 917 | 58.3% | 38.9% | D+19.4 |
| Precinct -PERRY 03PERRY 03 | 669 | 214 | 29 | 912 | 73.4% | 23.5% | D+49.9 |
| Precinct -PERRY 11PERRY 11 | 653 | 212 | 21 | 886 | 73.7% | 23.9% | D+49.8 |
| Precinct -PERRY 25PERRY 25 | 436 | 429 | 17 | 882 | 49.4% | 48.6% | D+0.8 |
| Precinct -INDIAN CREEKINDIAN CREEK | 316 | 537 | 18 | 871 | 36.3% | 61.7% | R+25.4 |
| Precinct -PERRY 26PERRY 26 | 672 | 184 | 14 | 870 | 77.2% | 21.1% | D+56.1 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 15BLOOMINGTON 15 | 518 | 329 | 22 | 869 | 59.6% | 37.9% | D+21.7 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 6RICHLAND 6 | 254 | 579 | 25 | 858 | 29.6% | 67.5% | R+37.9 |
| Precinct -PERRY 18PERRY 18 | 720 | 112 | 12 | 844 | 85.3% | 13.3% | D+72.0 |
| Precinct -BEAN BLOSSOM 1BEAN BLOSSOM 1 | 229 | 577 | 19 | 825 | 27.8% | 69.9% | R+42.2 |
| Precinct -PERRY 19PERRY 19 | 582 | 202 | 24 | 808 | 72.0% | 25.0% | D+47.0 |
| Precinct -PERRY 12PERRY 12 | 597 | 178 | 17 | 792 | 75.4% | 22.5% | D+52.9 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 5RICHLAND 5 | 341 | 420 | 18 | 779 | 43.8% | 53.9% | R+10.1 |
| Precinct -PERRY 10PERRY 10 | 555 | 206 | 14 | 775 | 71.6% | 26.6% | D+45.0 |
| Precinct -BEAN BLOSSOM 02BEAN BLOSSOM 02 | 276 | 481 | 14 | 771 | 35.8% | 62.4% | R+26.6 |
| Precinct -PERRY 14PERRY 14 | 633 | 115 | 19 | 767 | 82.5% | 15.0% | D+67.5 |
| Precinct -CLEAR CREEK 02CLEAR CREEK 02 | 333 | 406 | 18 | 757 | 44.0% | 53.6% | R+9.6 |
| Precinct -PERRY 16PERRY 16 | 668 | 66 | 14 | 748 | 89.3% | 8.8% | D+80.5 |
| Precinct -PERRY 17PERRY 17 | 572 | 133 | 18 | 723 | 79.1% | 18.4% | D+60.7 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 11BLOOMINGTON 11 | 439 | 262 | 21 | 722 | 60.8% | 36.3% | D+24.5 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 06BLOOMINGTON 06 | 608 | 100 | 12 | 720 | 84.4% | 13.9% | D+70.6 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 17BLOOMINGTON 17 | 540 | 161 | 18 | 719 | 75.1% | 22.4% | D+52.7 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 09BLOOMINGTON 09 | 588 | 108 | 18 | 714 | 82.4% | 15.1% | D+67.2 |
| Precinct -PERRY 09PERRY 09 | 553 | 140 | 18 | 711 | 77.8% | 19.7% | D+58.1 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 10BLOOMINGTON 10 | 581 | 86 | 15 | 682 | 85.2% | 12.6% | D+72.6 |
| Precinct -PERRY 08PERRY 08 | 610 | 50 | 15 | 675 | 90.4% | 7.4% | D+83.0 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 13BLOOMINGTON 13 | 508 | 134 | 25 | 667 | 76.2% | 20.1% | D+56.1 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 21BLOOMINGTON 21 | 564 | 88 | 14 | 666 | 84.7% | 13.2% | D+71.5 |
| Precinct -PERRY 32PERRY 32 | 529 | 113 | 5 | 647 | 81.8% | 17.5% | D+64.3 |
| Precinct -PERRY 02PERRY 02 | 438 | 194 | 14 | 646 | 67.8% | 30.0% | D+37.8 |
| Precinct -PERRY 13PERRY 13 | 457 | 162 | 17 | 636 | 71.9% | 25.5% | D+46.4 |
| Precinct -PERRY 31PERRY 31 | 546 | 62 | 18 | 626 | 87.2% | 9.9% | D+77.3 |
| Precinct -PERRY 01PERRY 01 | 473 | 121 | 16 | 610 | 77.5% | 19.8% | D+57.7 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 02BLOOMINGTON 02 | 457 | 134 | 13 | 604 | 75.7% | 22.2% | D+53.5 |
| Precinct -VAN BUREN 02VAN BUREN 02 | 304 | 274 | 16 | 594 | 51.2% | 46.1% | D+5.1 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 03RICHLAND 03 | 250 | 316 | 16 | 582 | 43.0% | 54.3% | R+11.3 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 16BLOOMINGTON 16 | 440 | 119 | 11 | 570 | 77.2% | 20.9% | D+56.3 |
| Precinct -PERRY 29PERRY 29 | 382 | 173 | 10 | 565 | 67.6% | 30.6% | D+37.0 |
| Precinct -PERRY 20PERRY 20 | 439 | 111 | 7 | 557 | 78.8% | 19.9% | D+58.9 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 14BLOOMINGTON 14 | 353 | 151 | 12 | 516 | 68.4% | 29.3% | D+39.1 |
| Precinct -PERRY 06PERRY 06 | 385 | 65 | 20 | 470 | 81.9% | 13.8% | D+68.1 |
| Precinct -PERRY 15PERRY 15 | 416 | 35 | 6 | 457 | 91.0% | 7.7% | D+83.4 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 22BLOOMINGTON 22 | 310 | 56 | 9 | 375 | 82.7% | 14.9% | D+67.7 |
| Precinct -PERRY 30PERRY 30 | 261 | 34 | 15 | 310 | 84.2% | 11.0% | D+73.2 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 05BLOOMINGTON 05 | 258 | 39 | 4 | 301 | 85.7% | 13.0% | D+72.8 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 23BLOOMINGTON 23 | 220 | 68 | 3 | 291 | 75.6% | 23.4% | D+52.2 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 20BLOOMINGTON 20 | 227 | 44 | 10 | 281 | 80.8% | 15.7% | D+65.1 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 08BLOOMINGTON 08 | 242 | 28 | 8 | 278 | 87.1% | 10.1% | D+77.0 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 03BLOOMINGTON 03 | 206 | 56 | 7 | 269 | 76.6% | 20.8% | D+55.8 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 18BLOOMINGTON 18 | 200 | 42 | 6 | 248 | 80.6% | 16.9% | D+63.7 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 24BLOOMINGTON 24 | 135 | 84 | 3 | 222 | 60.8% | 37.8% | D+23.0 |
| Precinct -PERRY 07PERRY 07 | 179 | 19 | 2 | 200 | 89.5% | 9.5% | D+80.0 |
| Precinct -PERRY 28PERRY 28 | 123 | 37 | 2 | 162 | 75.9% | 22.8% | D+53.1 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 19BLOOMINGTON 19 | 128 | 28 | 3 | 159 | 80.5% | 17.6% | D+62.9 |
| Precinct -POLKPOLK | 71 | 84 | 4 | 159 | 44.7% | 52.8% | R+8.2 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 01BLOOMINGTON 01 | 115 | 19 | 10 | 144 | 79.9% | 13.2% | D+66.7 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 04BLOOMINGTON 04 | 93 | 9 | 4 | 106 | 87.7% | 8.5% | D+79.2 |
| Precinct -BLOOMINGTON 07BLOOMINGTON 07 | 66 | 37 | 3 | 106 | 62.3% | 34.9% | D+27.4 |
| Precinct -RICHLAND 09RICHLAND 09 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 100.0% | 0.0% | D+100.0 |
| Precinct -BEAN BLOSSOM 3BEAN BLOSSOM 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| BEAN BLOSSOM 0118_1810500010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BEAN BLOSSOM 0218_1810500020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BENTON 0118_1810500030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BENTON 0218_1810500040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLOOMINGTON 0118_1810500050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLOOMINGTON 0218_1810500060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLOOMINGTON 0318_1810500070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLOOMINGTON 0418_1810500080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLOOMINGTON 0518_1810500090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLOOMINGTON 0618_1810500100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLOOMINGTON 0718_1810500110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLOOMINGTON 0818_1810500120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLOOMINGTON 0918_1810500130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLOOMINGTON 1018_1810500140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLOOMINGTON 1118_1810500150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLOOMINGTON 1218_1810500160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLOOMINGTON 1318_1810500170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLOOMINGTON 1418_1810500180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLOOMINGTON 1518_1810500190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLOOMINGTON 1618_1810500200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BLOOMINGTON 1718_1810500210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CLEAR CREEK 0118_1810500220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CLEAR CREEK 0218_1810500230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| INDIAN CREEK18_1810500240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 0118_1810500250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 0218_1810500260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 0318_1810500270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 0418_1810500280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 0518_1810500290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 0618_1810500300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 0718_1810500310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 0818_1810500320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 0918_1810500330 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 1018_1810500340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 1118_1810500350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 1218_1810500360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 1318_1810500370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 1418_1810500380 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 1518_1810500390 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 1618_1810500400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 1718_1810500410 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 1818_1810500420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 1918_1810500430 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 2018_1810500440 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 2118_1810500450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 2218_1810500460 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 2318_1810500470 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 2418_1810500480 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PERRY 2518_1810500490 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| POLK18_1810500500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND 0118_1810500510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND 0218_1810500520 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND 0318_1810500530 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND 0418_1810500540 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND 0518_1810500550 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND 0618_1810500560 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND 0718_1810500570 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND 0818_1810500580 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RICHLAND 0918_1810500590 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SALT CREEK18_1810500600 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VAN BUREN 0118_1810500610 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VAN BUREN 0218_1810500620 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VAN BUREN 0318_1810500630 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VAN BUREN 0418_1810500640 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VAN BUREN 0518_1810500650 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VAN BUREN 0618_1810500660 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON18_1810500670 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −1.8% |
| 1896 | −1.8% |
| 1900 | −7.4% |
| 1904 | −13.9% |
| 1908 | −4.6% |
| 1912 | +18.3% |
| 1916 | −3.9% |
| 1920 | −8.4% |
| 1924 | −13.8% |
| 1928 | −34.4% |
| 1932 | +4.4% |
| 1936 | +2.1% |
| 1940 | −11.9% |
| 1944 | −13.5% |
| 1948 | −12.6% |
| 1952 | −21.7% |
| 1956 | −26.1% |
| 1960 | −31.5% |
| 1964 | +7.2% |
| 1968 | −10.9% |
| 1972 | −13.2% |
| 1976 | −6.5% |
| 1980 | −13.3% |
| 1984 | −19.2% |
| 1988 | −13.2% |
| 1992 | +7.0% |
| 1996 | +4.5% |
| 2000 | −4.0% |
| 2004 | +8.2% |
| 2008 | +32.2% |
| 2012 | +19.1% |
| 2016 | +23.4% |
| 2020 | +28.2% |
| 2024 | +27.4% |
DemocraticRepublican
Federal and statewide elections · 36 Senate · 3 Senate special · 13 governor
U.S. Senate
Each row shows U.S. Senate votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
U.S. Senate special elections
Each row shows U.S. Senate special votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Governor
Each row shows Governor votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
voter registration
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
Registered voters
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 112,401 |
| 2018 | 94,206 |
| 2020 | 98,247 |
| 2022 | 98,407 |
| 2024 | 94,102 |
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−208 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net −3,051 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $53,367 in average income, against $87,389 for residents who stayed — 39% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+16.2 on average — 44 points more Republican-leaning than Monroe County, IN itself (D+27.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Marion County, IN359D+27.6
- Lawrence County, IN236R+51.0
- Greene County, IN181R+53.7
- Owen County, IN142R+50.7
- Hamilton County, IN128R+6.1
- Morgan County, IN87R+54.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Marion County, IN483
- Lawrence County, IN303
- Cook County, IL255
- Greene County, IN204
- Owen County, IN165
- Hamilton County, IN145
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +359 |
| 2012 | −189 |
| 2013 | −587 |
| 2014 | −54 |
| 2015 | −366 |
| 2016 | +22 |
| 2017 | −153 |
| 2018 | −931 |
| 2019 | −282 |
| 2021 | +3,962 |
| 2022 | −1,081 |
| 2023 | −1,715 |
| 2024 | −1,828 |
| 2025 | −208 |
Home to Indiana University's main campus in Bloomington, Monroe County posts Democratic presidential margins that stand well outside Indiana's statewide norm, reflecting the outsized electoral influence of a large college-town population.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 32.2 points in 2008 and a Republican high of 34.4 points in 1928. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 0.8 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 27.4 points.
A population of 140,965, a 81% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $65,868 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Boone County and Douglas County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Boone County
Missouri
96.1twin score
12-yr trendcollege share2020–2024 trajectory
Douglas County
Kansas
95.0twin score
2008–2024 trajectory≠ elasticity
Benton County
Oregon
94.5twin score
2008–2024 trajectory≠ elasticity
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Monroe County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18105/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Monroe County
Indiana at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Monroe County, Indiana vote in 2024?
In 2024, Monroe County, Indiana voted Democratic by 27.4 points (D+27.4), carried by the Democratic candidate. Out of 59,256 votes cast, 37,213 went Democratic and 21,004 went Republican.
When did Monroe County, Indiana last vote Republican?
The most recent presidential election in which Monroe County, Indiana voted Republican was 2000.
How many people live in Monroe County, Indiana?
Monroe County, Indiana has a population of 140,965 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Monroe County, Indiana?
Median household income in Monroe County, Indiana is $65,868 — below the national median of $80,734. The Indiana state median is $71,957.
What is the political history of Monroe County, Indiana?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Monroe County, Indiana from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 12 went Democratic and 22 went Republican.